Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
I'd have to check the logs, but it could be that we're not meeting
the minimum ham/spam results that are required to generate an update.
I've got it set to a minimum of 150,000 ham and spam each.
Yeah, since early April the ham results have fallen below the 150k
On Mon, 10 May 2010, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Yeah, since early April the ham results have fallen below the 150k
message threshold to about 143k messages. 150k was already quite a bit
lower than I was really comfortable with but I guess we could lower it
if necessary.
Are thre thresholds
On 11/05/2010 10:51 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
On Mon, 10 May 2010, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Yeah, since early April the ham results have fallen below the 150k
message threshold to about 143k messages. 150k was already quite a bit
lower than I was really comfortable with but I guess we could
