[Bug 6589] New: Errors in man pages

2011-05-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6589 Bug #: 6589 Summary: Errors in man pages Product: Spamassassin Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version) Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW

[Bug 6589] Errors in man pages

2011-05-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6589 --- Comment #1 from Mark Martinec mark.marti...@ijs.si 2011-05-17 13:03:23 UTC --- Created attachment 4889 -- https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=4889 manpage-has-bad-whatis-entry -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 6589] Errors in man pages

2011-05-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6589 --- Comment #2 from Mark Martinec mark.marti...@ijs.si 2011-05-17 13:03:50 UTC --- Created attachment 4890 -- https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=4890 manpage-has-errors-from-man -- Configure bugmail:

Re: Updating debian build directory?

2011-05-17 Thread John Hardin
On Mon, 16 May 2011, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote: On 05/16, Mark Martinec wrote: IMO the distribution-specific packaging stuff has no right to be kept in a generic Unix/Linux/Windows package like SpamAssassin and should be wiped out entirely. The package maintainers know their job and their

[Bug 6589] Errors in man pages

2011-05-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6589 --- Comment #4 from Mark Martinec mark.marti...@ijs.si 2011-05-17 13:17:23 UTC --- Actually, with te patch applied it now sais: $ podchecker lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Util/DependencyInfo.pm *** ERROR: =over on line 231 without closing

[Bug 6589] Errors in man pages

2011-05-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6589 Mark Martinec mark.marti...@ijs.si changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #4889|0 |1

Re: [Bug 6589] Errors in man pages

2011-05-17 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
Taking some off-list discussion back on list... The podchecker reports some unresolved internal link 'TAGGING' warnings, don't know what - if anything - can be done about it: Interesting. OK, I only get two errors with 5.10.1 but now have a system generating the same errors. TAGGING is a

Re: [Bug 6589] Errors in man pages

2011-05-17 Thread Mark Martinec
Kevin A. McGrail writes: Taking some off-list discussion back on list... The podchecker reports some unresolved internal link 'TAGGING' warnings, don't know what - if anything - can be done about it: Interesting. OK, I only get two errors with 5.10.1 but now have a system

Re: [Bug 6589] Errors in man pages

2011-05-17 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
Looks good to me, thanks. Please apply. Mark Applied to trunk. 3.3 as well? Sendinglib/spamassassin-run.pod Sendingmasses/perceptron.pod Transmitting file data .. Committed revision 1104435.

Re: [Bug 6589] Errors in man pages

2011-05-17 Thread Mark Martinec
Looks good to me, thanks. Please apply. Mark Applied to trunk. Sendinglib/spamassassin-run.pod Sendingmasses/perceptron.pod Transmitting file data .. Committed revision 1104435. Thanks. 3.3 as well? I'd say yes, it's just a minor docs fix. Mark

Re: Updating debian build directory?

2011-05-17 Thread Warren Togami Jr.
On 5/17/2011 3:09 AM, John Hardin wrote: On Mon, 16 May 2011, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote: On 05/16, Mark Martinec wrote: IMO the distribution-specific packaging stuff has no right to be kept in a generic Unix/Linux/Windows package like SpamAssassin and should be wiped out entirely. The

[Bug 6314] Remove spamasssasin.spec from future releases

2011-05-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6314 Warren Togami wtog...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||2 votes needed

[Bug 6314] Remove spamasssasin.spec from future releases

2011-05-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6314 --- Comment #22 from AXB axb.li...@gmail.com 2011-05-17 21:23:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #21) I strongly desire to remove spamassassin.spec from 3.3.2 and trunk. The existence of this .spec is a frequent support headache for the

[Bug 6314] Remove spamasssasin.spec from future releases

2011-05-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6314 --- Comment #23 from Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com 2011-05-17 21:30:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #22) (In reply to comment #21) I strongly desire to remove spamassassin.spec from 3.3.2 and trunk. The existence of this

[Bug 6314] Remove spamasssasin.spec from future releases

2011-05-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6314 Warren Togami wtog...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug 6314] Remove spamasssasin.spec from future releases

2011-05-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6314 --- Comment #25 from Darxus dar...@chaosreigns.com 2011-05-17 21:47:52 UTC --- You may also want spamd/redhat-rc-script.sh -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving

[Bug 6314] Remove spamasssasin.spec from future releases

2011-05-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6314 --- Comment #26 from AXB axb.li...@gmail.com 2011-05-17 21:53:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #25) You may also want spamd/redhat-rc-script.sh I'd leave the init.d script. It's a handy sample for those inastalling from source on

Ubuntu daily builds failed today Re: Updating debian build directory?

2011-05-17 Thread darxus
One hunk of a patch failed because it is now already in trunk. Easy to fix. But I'm really not feeling like fixing it if my work isn't going to get into trunk. I think having somebody (me) running daily builds of trunk on a small production server is useful. As well as the increased ease of

Re: Ubuntu daily builds failed today Re: Updating debian build directory?

2011-05-17 Thread Warren Togami Jr.
On 5/17/2011 12:30 PM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote: May I please update the debian directory in trunk, instead of it just being deleted. Hasn't Darxus done more than enough to prove his worth as an upstream committer? Sure he hasn't worked in the traditional manner as a rule writer, but

Re: Ubuntu daily builds failed today Re: Updating debian build directory?

2011-05-17 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 5/17/2011 6:30 PM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote: One hunk of a patch failed because it is now already in trunk. Easy to fix. But I'm really not feeling like fixing it if my work isn't going to get into trunk. I think having somebody (me) running daily builds of trunk on a small production

Build failed in Jenkins: SpamAssassin-3.3.x #49

2011-05-17 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/SpamAssassin-3.3.x/49/changes Changes: [wtogami] Bug #6314: Remove spamassassin.spec -- [...truncated 15716 lines...] ok 3 ok 4 ok 5 ok t/whitelist_addrs... 1..35 # Running under perl version

Build failed in Jenkins: SpamAssassin-trunk #7034

2011-05-17 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/SpamAssassin-trunk/7034/changes Changes: [jm] auto-generated test rules [jm] auto-generated test rules [wtogami] Bug #6314: Remove spamassassin.spec -- [...truncated 16302 lines...] ok 3 ok 4 ok 5 ok

Re: SA 3.3.2 Release Candidate 1 call for testing comments

2011-05-17 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
On 16/05/2011 10:30 PM, Warren Togami Jr. wrote: On 5/16/2011 4:26 PM, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: On 16/05/2011 5:59 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: However, I am using sa-update's rules version 1083704. What are your thoughts on including 1083704.tar.gz as the rules tarball for 3.3.2 since

Jenkins build is back to normal : SpamAssassin-3.3.x #50

2011-05-17 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/SpamAssassin-3.3.x/50/changes

Re: SA 3.3.2 Release Candidate 1 call for testing comments

2011-05-17 Thread Sidney Markowitz
Is this a known issue or non-issue? On my macbook in make test I'm getting t/trust_path.t 49/96 # Failed test 69 in t/trust_path.t at line 694 fail #23 # Failed test 72 in t/trust_path.t at line 694 fail #24 # Failed test 75 in t/trust_path.t at line 694 fail #25 # Failed

Jenkins build is back to normal : SpamAssassin-trunk #7035

2011-05-17 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/SpamAssassin-trunk/7035/changes

Re: SA 3.3.2 Release Candidate 1 call for testing comments

2011-05-17 Thread Sidney Markowitz
I enabled run_sql_pref_tests and this time I also got a failure in test 14 of t/spamd_sql_prefs.t I ran the same make test on a Fedora 14 box and got the same failed tests, trust_path.t tests 69, 72, 75 and 78; and spamd_sql_prefs.t test 14. In case the local network configuration might have