On Jun 18, 2013, at 11:39 AM, Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com wrote:
On 6/18/2013 12:19 PM, Mark Martinec wrote:
Don't think a week is needed, perhaps a day would be in order to let AXB
roll this version into his setup and let it run for a little while.
OK, I'll check the vote tomorrow
On Jan 4, 2013, at 10:13 AM, Mark Martinec mark.martinec...@ijs.si wrote:
It's probably no big deal, but I wonder what is
the purpose of this test???
It is looking for spammy-looking names of the rules
or something else???
[P.S. now after trying to send this posting for the second
On Jan 4, 2013, at 11:24 AM, Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com wrote:
OK, so we are consistently failing this test on Jenkins
https://builds.apache.org/job/SpamAssassin-trunk/8284/testReport/make_test/t_uribl_all_types_t/test__2/
And I don't know if we can get the output log.
On Jun 30, 2012, at 5:56 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
On 30.6.2012 21:32, João Gouveia wrote:
Hi Jarif,
Are you the owner of the jarif corpus being used on the Spamassassin
masschecks?
If so, I'm interested in investigating these classification errors:
On Mar 11, 2012, at 10:21 AM, Axb wrote:
On 03/11/2012 04:02 PM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 03/11, Axb wrote:
There are a number of reasons for the score generator to come up with this
result.
agreed, and that doesn't mean it's 100% accurate.
Yep. Well, I'd use ideal instead of
On Feb 27, 2012, at 9:53 AM, Jeroen Koekkoek wrote:
Hi,
I'm testing my module now, and I wanted to build in some kind of timeout for
reconnecting to the master database. But as far as I can tell SpamAssassin
creates a new connection per incoming message, that would mean that creating
Do you need to also change the regex?
Michael
On Feb 21, 2012, at 7:04 AM, a...@apache.org wrote:
Author: axb
Date: Tue Feb 21 13:04:42 2012
New Revision: 1291757
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1291757view=rev
Log:
see
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6734
On Feb 21, 2012, at 9:05 AM, Axb wrote:
On 02/21/2012 03:36 PM, Michael Parker wrote:
Do you need to also change the regex?
??? you mean other than add the TLDs to the list?
Yep, notice the comment right below where you added your comments:
#
# Remember to also change regexp below when
On Feb 14, 2012, at 10:07 AM, Jeroen Koekkoek wrote:
Hi,
I dived a little deeper into SpamAssassin's code. In
lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/Bayes.pm a plugin is called. It concerns the
following code:
- code -
$self-{main}-call_plugins(bayes_scan, { toksref = $msgtokens,
On Dec 3, 2011, at 11:12 AM, John Hardin wrote:
Okay, from the masscheck this rule looks really attractive:
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20111202-r1209002-n/T_ACH_CANCELLED/detail
1.000 S.O and most hits on spams scoring 5 points from other rules.
...so can anybody suggest why the
On Sep 14, 2011, at 11:05 AM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 09/14, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Here's my best recap and explanation because I think you are confusing the
branch issue too much.
To summarize: Incrementing the version from 3.3.x to 3.4.x without
branching svn qualifies
On Aug 15, 2011, at 5:14 PM, bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6649
--- Comment #8 from Justin Mason j...@jmason.org 2011-08-15 22:14:02 UTC ---
it's a phish containing the following MIME headers:
Content-Type: ;
Howdy,
Can someone set MichaelParker up with wiki privs.
Thanks
Michael
How is this change different from what is provided in the HitFreqsRuleTiming
plugin?
Seems like we have plugin call support for this, do we really need this change?
Maybe a more user friendly plugin instead.
I'm -.9 on this change as is.
Michael
On Jul 24, 2011, at 10:32 AM, John Hardin
On Jul 24, 2011, at 12:04 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, Michael Parker wrote:
How is this change different from what is provided in the
HitFreqsRuleTiming plugin?
...okay, that took about five seconds to find once I was reminded
On Jul 24, 2011, at 2:55 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, Michael Parker wrote:
On Jul 24, 2011, at 12:04 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, Michael Parker wrote:
How is this change different from what is provided in the
HitFreqsRuleTiming plugin?
The plugin
On Jun 23, 2011, at 7:53 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 6/22/2011 8:48 PM, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
Please review the text of this DRAFT 3.3.2 release announcement. Verify
that the checksums match the files on the mirrors. Should more of the less
important changes since 3.3.1 be removed?
Ugh, well it's showing up on search.cpan.org as an unauthorized release.
I guess we need to get Justin and Theo to setup some more co-maintainer
permissions here.
Justin and Theo can you please do the needful.
Thanks
Michael
On Jun 21, 2011, at 10:25 PM, Michael Parker wrote:
Lots
Ideally all but Mail::SpamAssassin should be removed from the indexer, can we
make that happen?
Michael
On Jun 22, 2011, at 7:10 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 6/22/2011 2:21 AM, Michael Parker wrote:
Ugh, well it's showing up on search.cpan.org as an unauthorized release.
Hmm, tried my
JMASON
Mail::SpamAssassin PARKER Michael Parker co-maintJMASON
which would seem to cover it, right? Why is it unauthorized?!
It's submodules like Mail::SpamAssassin::AICache that are flagging things.
My guess is that module didn't exist in a version you uploaded
On Jun 21, 2011, at 8:38 PM, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
The instructions are confusing and do not appear to reflect reality. I do
not want to risk breaking anything by digging deeper when I have insufficient
time to fix it if anything goes wrong.
- update the 'doc' tree in the
+1 from me.
Michael
On Jun 6, 2011, at 8:28 PM, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
We need +3 votes from PMC (or the release manager) to declare 3.3.2 an
official ASF release. This 3.3.2 release has no changes since 3.3.2-rc2.
Please do some testing before voting.
If you are not a PMC member,
Passes make test on FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE and 6.3-STABLE
Michael
On May 23, 2011, at 4:32 PM, Mark Martinec wrote:
So, taking [Bug 6426] and [Bug 6544] as examples, what is
a sentiment about such? Just close after the change has been
commited to trunk for some time, or should we follow a voting
procedure for each open problem report?
First off, you're
On May 13, 2011, at 6:37 PM, wtog...@apache.org wrote:
Author: wtogami
Date: Fri May 13 23:37:27 2011
New Revision: 1102926
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1102926view=rev
Log:
Prep 3.3.2-rc1
Modified:
spamassassin/branches/3.3/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin.pm
Modified:
On May 12, 2011, at 8:42 PM, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
On 05/12/2011 12:24 PM, Mark Martinec wrote:
Warren wrote:
6526 is not critical, it could be fixed after rc1 or anytime later in
sa-update without risk.
Oops, I was thinking about the URI skip list bug, not rfc-ignorant.
I think the
On May 5, 2011, at 7:50 PM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 05/06, Mark Martinec wrote:
Thanks, helpful!
Worked around it now in Bug 6500 / t/originating_ip_hdr.t
Cool. make test and make disttest are both passing here now.
Jenkins is quite a lot less self explanatory than it could
Clicking on various bugs shows a nasty mysql error in bugzilla:
undef error - DBD::mysql::st execute failed: Can't create/write to file
'/var/tmp/#sql610_346949_5.MYI' (Errcode: 28) [for Statement SELECT DISTINCT
groups.id, name,
followed by a big traceback.
Michael
I know the bug report says re2c but I don't think that using RE2 or RE2::Set
would really be a component of sa-compile, so I'm not sure the sa-compile
component is appropriate.
IMO they would be mutually exclusive, although it would take some
experimentation because in some cases RE2/RE2::Set
On Aug 18, 2010, at 10:31 AM, Matt Sergeant wrote:
bugzilla-dae...@issues.apache.org wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6483
--- Comment #2 from Mark Martinec
mark.marti...@ijs.si
2010-08-18 10:46:44 UTC ---
Is there a mature perl wrapper for RE2?
Howdy,
Has anyone done any benchmarking between Perl 5.10.1 and 5.8.5 with
the latest 3.3.0 release?
What did you find? I understand that the regex stuffs in 5.10.x are
improved but do they actually help performance?
Thanks
Michael
On Jan 15, 2010, at 9:38 AM, Mark Martinec wrote:
On Friday 15 January 2010 16:29:42 Justin Mason wrote:
PROPOSED 3.3.0-rc
Downloads are available from:
please vote. cheers ;)
If there is an intention to add 'use bytes' into Message.pm,
then it would be better to do it in rc3, and not at
On Jan 15, 2010, at 2:12 PM, Mark Martinec wrote:
Michael Parker wrote:
If there is an intention to add 'use bytes' into Message.pm,
then it would be better to do it in rc3, and not at the
time of a final release.
We really need a freqdiff with the use bytes change on as many
messages
Also note this page:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
In particular the voting for releases section.
Votes on Package Releases
Votes on whether a package is ready to be released follow a format
similar to majority approval -- except that the decision is officially
On Nov 17, 2009, at 9:48 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 13:36, Mark Martinec Mark.Martinec
+...@ijs.si wrote:
About the 6203, I have some stats collected. Also the AWL race
condition:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4642#c1
is worrying me. I'm
Anyone have any thoughts on this? the BLANK_LINES rules appear to be
broken.
Michael
Begin forwarded message:
From: Michael Parker park...@pobox.com
Date: September 21, 2009 10:22:26 AM CDT
To: SpamAssassin Dev dev@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: split_into_array_of_short_paragraphs vs
Howdy,
I was looking at why our old 3.1 instance of SA was hitting a few of
the BLANK_LINES_NN_NN rules where as 3.3 stuff wasn't hitting at all.
I narrowed it down to what get_decoded_body_text_array returns.
For instance, I have a short mail that is 4 lines long. In 3.1
On Sep 3, 2009, at 5:16 PM, Warren Togami wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RescoreDetails
Do not use --reuse if you have scanned with SA, but have configured
that scanner to run with -L, or you have disabled common network
tests or SPF. This is because it relies on the presence
On Aug 13, 2009, at 4:26 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:46, Jeff Chanje...@surbl.org wrote:
On Thursday, July 16, 2009, 1:40:34 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
One useful factor of ham is that it's not time-sensitive; a mail
that
was ham in 2003 would still be ham today. So we
On Aug 13, 2009, at 4:07 PM, Warren Togami wrote:
On 08/13/2009 11:04 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
IMHO, none of the network tests should be used during masscheck
for ham
older than 4 weeks. Thoughts?
if we had enough ham to get useful results with that limit, sure. As
it is, I'm not sure
On Jul 6, 2009, at 2:52 PM, Warren Togami wrote:
On 07/06/2009 03:13 PM, Warren Togami wrote:
On 07/03/2009 10:37 PM, Matt Kettler wrote:
The public alpha release was announced yesterday on the users
mailing
list:
On Jul 6, 2009, at 3:46 PM, Warren Togami wrote:
On 07/06/2009 03:59 PM, Michael Parker wrote:
Yes. 3.3 requires that you run sa-update after installation to pick
up
the latest rules release. I believe this is documented.
For packagers such as yourself, you'll probably want to have
On Apr 2, 2009, at 3:17 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Please keep in mind you can step into my soliloquy at any time. :)
I seem to recall I've seen some tflags(?) or something commands,
to have
a newly named rule inherit previous mass-check results. Is my mind
playing tricks on me, or
Howdy,
Its that time of year again when Google Summer of Code is starting to
kick off and the ASF is participating. I've signed up as a mentor
again this year, just in case we have some SpamAssassin projects in
the mix, we didn't end up with any last year.
In the past its always worked
How about an XS based message parser?
Maybe something pluggable so you could easily swap in an XS based on
or different perl ones depending on the need or available
infrastructure (ie no complier available).
Michael
On Feb 10, 2009, at 1:31 PM, Mark Martinec wrote:
Bug or feature?
Feature. Theo can talk more to this but I believe we wanted to
standardize on a generated id instead of using the header value since
headers are easily forged/duplicated even though the message wasn't
the same.
On Dec 16, 2008, at 8:09 AM, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
Hey all,
I've been writing a BerkeleyDB-based BayesStore (with the intention of
contributing it when it's complete), and I was wondering if the
regular
SA test suite is sufficient to validate the implementation, or if
someone has any
On Mar 12, 2008, at 3:47 PM, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
On 12/03/2008 4:26 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
hmm...
I notice that Yahoo! are running a Hadoop Summit --
http://developer.yahoo.com/hadoop/summit/ . It's notable that this is
being held outside the (rather expensive) Apachecon framework.
Would anyone object to removing .so from this list? The .so TLD is
basically dead and we've found that lots of bogus domains like lib*.so
are being caught by this. Also sometimes you'll have spammers who are
putting in gibberish or funny punctuation and you'll get sentences
like 'blah
Howdy,
Has anyone besides me noticed some missing commit emails? Maybe their
are sitting in the moderation queue or something, but I've had 3
commits over the weekend that never made it to the commit list. Its
not all commits, some of them are showing up. I'm not seeing them in
the
On Nov 25, 2007, at 10:16 PM, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Were there tests checked in that perhaps caused the mail to score
over 10 plus whatever the score for ALL_TRUSTED is?
DOH!
They had the GTUBE string in them :)
That solves that.
Michael
On Nov 24, 2007, at 11:00 AM, Mark Martinec wrote:
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-24
08:51 ---
Took the BETA label off the SQL README files. Also added a short
note
about it to UPGRADE.
Perhaps the same should be done for AWL:
README.awl:
NB: This
Mark Martinec wrote:
It needs to be reverted asap.
asap? Is anybody running trunk code under 5.6 ???
This isn't the only concern. There are performance penalties once you
bring the Encode module into play. Please see the discussion some
months back when John Myers added the other Encoding
Mark Martinec wrote:
+use Encode;
indicates that Encode is not available on perl 5.6.1.
... but its routines are already used in Message/Node.pm !?
Mark
Aren't they wrapped around a conditional? -1 for requiring Encode.
We've had this discussion before.
Michael
Justin Mason wrote:
If you use amavis or mailscanner, that would certainly provide a better
way to do it. However, if you don't use them, and instead use procmail
and spamc/spamd (as I do), this plugin is the most efficient way to call
clamav on inbound mail. (as far as I can tell)
Then
Justin Mason wrote:
Maybe we should add a --force-reuse that would ignore any msgs that
can't be reused.
I'm thinking that should be the only option for reuse.
+1 That sounds like a very good idea. Well, at least, let's get an idea
of how many mass-check lines we lose, and we can make a
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Random thoughts on frequent re-scoring mass-checks...
If we do more frequent --net mass-checks we may individually run the
chance of being blocked by the providers of the (URI)DNSBLs such as
Spamhaus.
Has anyone been blocked to date? Probably not given the once
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Michael Parker wrote:
Maybe we should add a --force-reuse that would ignore any msgs that
can't be reused.
I'm thinking that should be the only option for reuse.
This is how it originally worked, but a large portion of the spam traps
had never been run through
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Implement a way for:
- plugins to declare their own version number
- config code to check for a version of the plugin -- ifpluginversion
This will allow for third party rules and plugins to be distributed
independently of each other while allowing (in the rules)
Nicolas Fertig wrote:
Hello,
I try to set different score in a custom plugin.
The goal is to get this working with one call like below:
Content of file my_plugin.cf
full MY_PLUGIN eval:check_my_method()
describe CTASD Commtouch(TM) AntiSpam
Michael Monnerie wrote:
Dear list, I got this message and do not understand why it happened.
protegate5.zmi.at (212.69.162.205) is our mailgate, but when I click on
that openspf.org link now, it writes that the e-mail should have
passed. Has the SPF record been changed, or is there some
Howdy,
Anyone planning on attending ApacheCon US this year?
Michael
Justin Mason wrote:
Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.3 is now available! This is a maintenance
release of the 3.2.x branch.
Downloads are available from:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/downloads.cgi
When we are doing releases we really need to let them propagate to the
mirrors a little (ideally
Justin Mason wrote:
Michael Parker writes:
Justin Mason wrote:
Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.3 is now available! This is a maintenance
release of the 3.2.x branch.
Downloads are available from:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/downloads.cgi
When we are doing releases we really need to let them
Howdy,
I notice there are several bugs up for review that are rule updates. Do
we really need to vote for rule updates? I thought rule updates are C-T-R.
Michael
Justin Mason wrote:
Theo Van Dinter writes:
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 05:54:18PM +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
as far as I know, if they're rules in the rulesrc tree, it's
C-T-R; but rules in the rules dir are still R-T-C.
I'd be happy to loosen this up, though.
I'm fine with that too. The
Doc Schneider wrote:
I noticed we're now seeing a lot of folks using such an old perl 5.6.1
that maybe we should update our SpamAssassin requirement to use 5.8.0 as
a bare minimum. I know that DBI requires 5.8.0 and states that while it
may or may not build with a lesser version, you can't
Justin Mason wrote:
The patch is then [WWW] voted upon, and if gets a [WWW] consensus
approval and is not [WWW] vetoed, can be applied to the tree. Votes
should generally be permitted to run for at least 24 hours to provide an
opportunity for all concerned persons to participate
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
Huh! The problem is the usual one: GIGO
Y 8 .../8bcaeebfaa ...,RCVD_IN_PBL,RCVD_IN_PBL,...
It's assumed that the rule list should have a unique set of names, so
hit-frequencies just adds the entry twice.
So now the question is: why does mass-check put the same
Justin Mason wrote:
Tony Finch writes:
I install SpamAssassin and the libraries it needs separately from the
system perl so that I can have parallel installs of different versions.
This leads to the tests failing because they run spamassassin.raw rather
than the generated spamassassin which
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jm
Date: Wed May 2 04:59:05 2007
New Revision: 534404
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=534404
Log:
Creating the new 3.2.0 maintainance branch
Added:
spamassassin/branches/b3_2_0/
- copied from r534402,
Justin Mason wrote:
Michael Parker writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jm
Date: Wed May 2 04:59:05 2007
New Revision: 534404
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=534404
Log:
Creating the new 3.2.0 maintainance branch
Added:
spamassassin/branches/b3_2_0
Justin Mason wrote:
Michael Parker writes:
build/README used the b3_x_0 format. if 3.2 was more appropriate, we
should have updated the procedure docs... :(
Hmm that doesn't make it right, I think breaking from what was already
established is a bad idea. I'd vote for going ahead
Howdy,
I just wanted to send a short note letting everyone know that we have
two students as part of the Google Summer of Code this year.
Zhang Shunchang will be working on a clean room implementation of the
Persistent Database Connection plugin.
Jianyong Dai (Daniel) will be working on
Michael Parker wrote:
Jianyong Dai (Daniel) will be working on implementing Dolby Noise
As Kevin points out in another thread, I meant Dobly.
Michael
I don't think the ==Removed== stuff should be in here, that was just to
note it had been removed from the list on the wiki.
Michael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: maddoc
Date: Tue Apr 10 15:03:13 2007
New Revision: 527323
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=527323
Log:
Changes to
Justin Mason wrote:
OK, I've applied the fixes for bug 5313 (the prefork one, silence sounds
good) and bug 5399 (the text plain EMPTY_MESSAGE one). shout if you
disagree with either fix ;)
Otherwise I suggest we should put out an rc2 in a day or two. Sound good?
Sounds good to me.
Nick Radov wrote:
I have been working to integrate SpamAssassin with the Lotus Domino e-mail
server:
http://www.openntf.org/Projects/pmt.nsf/ProjectLookup/SpamAssassin%20Integration.
Currently to check a message with spamd it has to launch an external spamc
process. I would like to improve
Justin Mason wrote:
I propose I cut a 3.2.0rc1 release candidate tomorrow, then we give *that*
a week to accumulate bugs, and vote on whether it becomes 3.2.0 GA at that
point. Shout now if you think this is a bad plan...
I think it is a good plan.
Michael
Michael Parker wrote:
Howdy,
With Justin busy I figured I'd take on the task of driving project ideas
and what not, getting them onto the wiki and sending out notices to the
users mailing list.
What I'd like to do is get a list of folks willing to mentor.
No takers? Time is starting
Howdy,
With Justin busy I figured I'd take on the task of driving project ideas
and what not, getting them onto the wiki and sending out notices to the
users mailing list.
What I'd like to do is get a list of folks willing to mentor.
Mentoring is pretty easy, for me it took less than an hour a
here:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/WeLoveVolunteers
that you would like to work on, feel free to add it to the list and
submit an application.
Last year we were able to take on several projects, its a nice way to
earn 4500 USD over the summer.
Thanks
Michael Parker
Duncan Findlay wrote:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 01:26:05PM +, Justin Mason wrote:
As noted in recent dev list traffic (see below), we have a problem: we
haven't been able to publish a 3.2.0 prerelease tarball yet in the past
few weeks, due to lack of votes across two attempts.
Duncan Findlay wrote:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 01:26:05PM +, Justin Mason wrote:
As noted in recent dev list traffic (see below), we have a problem: we
haven't been able to publish a 3.2.0 prerelease tarball yet in the past
few weeks, due to lack of votes across two attempts.
Justin Mason wrote:
Doc Schneider writes:
Justin Mason wrote:
should we just not bother with votes for prereleases?
To be honest, I can't see the harm in accidentally pushing a prerelease
tarball at the wrong time -- and this is the second 3.2.0-preX that isn't
garnering votes, so clearly
Justin Mason wrote:
hey everyone --
don't forget to submit your mass-check results -- if they're not
quite finished, I suggest either CTRL-C'ing and submitting what you've
got, ASAP, or replying to this mail, as the deadline is imminent (like
in an hour or so).
I'd like to request an
Justin Mason wrote:
Theo Van Dinter writes:
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 03:14:07PM -0600, Doc Schneider wrote:
And have we got the results for the first run? Just curious.
There are some results in already, 557921 ham, 868798 spam.
yeah -- I'm not going to start the gronking until tomorrow --
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Justin Mason wrote:
hi all --
OK, if you're planning to send us mass-check logs for the 3.2.0
rescoring,
now's the time!
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RescoreDetails has all the details.
Why do the instructions have bayes auto learning and AWL turned off?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jm
Date: Mon Jan 29 14:32:18 2007
New Revision: 501204
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=501204
Log:
bug 5311: die() if no plugin implements 'check_main' and the check() API is
called, otherwise it's reasonably easy to wind up with a
Justin Mason wrote:
Michael Parker writes:
I think I mentioned this before, but my idea here was to build it into
call_plugins. Have a param that said if something MUST implement the
plugin call and die otherwise.
That's where we started, but not what we agreed, in the end... take a look
Apache Wiki wrote:
== Using network tests ==
- For mass-checks for scoresets 1 or 3, using network tests, you need to
provide the {{{--net}}} switch. Ensure Net::DNS, Mail::SPF::Query, Razor,
Pyzor and DCC are installed.
+ For mass-checks for scoresets 1 or 3, using network
Justin Mason wrote:
Michael Parker writes:
Apache Wiki wrote:
== Using network tests ==
- For mass-checks for scoresets 1 or 3, using network tests, you need to
provide the {{{--net}}} switch. Ensure Net::DNS, Mail::SPF::Query, Razor,
Pyzor and DCC are installed.
+ For mass
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ok (spamcrun (-A data/spam/009, \patterns_run_cb));
Need to update the test case to remove -A and go with --headers
Michael
Justin Mason wrote:
hi Matt --
could you upload these changes, as a diff against the existing code, to a
new bug on our bugzilla? it's a lot easier to track contributions that
way. Sounds very useful btw!
Yes, it would also be great to continue efforts on the History plugin,
the AWL
Matt Hampton wrote:
Michael Parker wrote:
Yes, it would also be great to continue efforts on the History plugin,
the AWL replacement that would include expiry and the like. That bug is
here:
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=3082
Michael: You mention the history
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jm
Date: Mon Jan 8 07:33:53 2007
New Revision: 494093
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=494093
Log:
add spamc '-z' switch, which compresses mails to be scanned using zlib
compression; very useful for long-distance use of spamc over the
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
Dears,
actually, I see the Bayes database in SA can be either per-user or
system-wide.
I would like to have a way to put bayes tokens on a per-user basis,
and fetch them on a more system-wide (or pheraps domain-wide) way.
Without going much further, you can
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
TVD_STOCK_02
all of my ham hits are mails talking about spams, which I probably should
delete from the corpus. :|
would appreciate seeing what is causing the hits (look for /^.*:/ lines)
../ham-parkerm.log:.
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
ham-parkerm.log:Y
/home/parker/SA/corpus/ham/200611/new/1164052169.endor.107.595699678303:2,
these are the for BASE64_LENGTH rules, btw. thanks. :)
Mine is a confirmed ham, Google Calender notice. The invite.ics
attachment is a little chunk of base64.
Michael
Hi Cedric,
The BayesStore API is designed in such a way that implementing a
separate store for this sort of thing would be super easy. I suggest
you subclass SQL and make the changes and call it something new.
I'm probably -1 on changing the top level, fairly generic, SQL.pm to do
what you're
1 - 100 of 250 matches
Mail list logo
