http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-13 08:32 ---
Which trunk version do you recommend?
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-13 09:01 ---
Subject: Re: [review] spamd parent stops accepting requests
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 08:32:23AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which trunk version do you
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-10 13:11 ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [~/spamassassin/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.1]# patch
-p0spamd.patch
patching file lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm
Hunk #1 succeeded at 668 with fuzz 1
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-10 13:16 ---
Subject: Re: [review] spamd parent stops accepting requests
On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 01:11:19PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|Index:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-09 08:39 ---
/me smells code duplication here :~) But this can be refactored in trunk, the
patch itself looks good from the first glance, I'll apply it to my local spamd
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-07 22:07 ---
Subject: Re: [review] spamd parent stops accepting requests
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 06:03:35PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-08 11:13 ---
Subject: Re: [review] spamd parent stops accepting requests
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 11:10:51AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2004-12-08 12:31:52.653926500
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-08 11:25 ---
nah, its pretty much stock, even the rules. init.pre has the basic ones
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL
loadplugin
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-08 11:27 ---
PMS::check() calls a 'check_end', line 252 in v3.0.1
$self-{main}-call_plugins (check_end, { permsgstatus = $self });
--- You are receiving this mail
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-08 11:56 ---
Subject: Re: [review] spamd parent stops accepting requests
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 11:27:57AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PMS::check() calls a
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-08 13:15 ---
k.. so i'll add some more logmsg() calls in between check_end and the next
logmsg so we can pinpoint this. next time i happens we should be really close.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #2553 is|0 |1
obsolete|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-03 12:40 ---
Subject: Re: [review] spamd parent stops accepting requests
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 12:32:34PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Additional Comments From
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-03 12:41 ---
Why hasn't there been any activity as of the last week?
Because nobody has worked on it in the last week.
--- You are receiving this mail because:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-24 07:00 ---
okay, after adding additional debug at the cleanup stages, it looks like it
hangs here on copy_config(). and that makes sense because the alarm on check()
is
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-24 07:38 ---
Subject: Re: [review] spamd parent stops accepting requests
so i guess now i get to dbg out sub copy_config. :)
What version of Storable are you running?
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-24 07:59 ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] perlmod]# ls -la Storable-2.08.tar.gz
-rw-r--r--1 dallase dallase 97219 Sep 5 2003 Storable-2.08.tar.gz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]#
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-24 10:05 ---
Subject: Re: [review] spamd parent stops accepting requests
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
okay, but we still run into a similar deal here.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-23 14:00 ---
i just did some more work on my timeout patch and was wanting a little feedback.
basically what i am doing is passing the timeout_child to Message-new() in the
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-23 14:03 ---
Subject: Re: [review] spamd parent stops accepting requests
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 02:00:52PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
basically what i am doing is
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-23 14:03 ---
wow, my fingers are frozen from cleaning out the gutters and hanging xmas
lights... funciton = function, handle = handful, and /usr/bin/spam =
/usr/bin/spamd
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-23 14:06 ---
Subject: Re: [review] spamd parent stops accepting requests
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 05:03:09PM -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
Message() should have nothing to
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-23 15:01 ---
okay, help me understand the flow here in spamd, this is what i see..
1) spamd M::SA-new
2) spamd spawn children
3) spamd accept_a_conn()
4) spamd check()
5)
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-23 15:26 ---
would this method be better.. in spamd
my $status = $spamtest-check($mail);
becomes
my $status = $spamtest-check($mail,time());
and then in M::SA::check()
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-23 15:37 ---
'it cant be stored
in $self-{main} unless it was something like
$self-{main}-{pid_of_child}-{start_time}'
actually, no, it's fine to do that -- each M:SA object
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-20 05:23 ---
Justin, I think you might have hit the nail right on the head with this
statement:
Dallas btw -- what's the CPU on that box? is it hyperthreaded?
Tom
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- You
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-20 10:18 ---
Subject: Re: [review] spamd parent stops accepting requests
On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 05:23:13AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. What type of CPU are you
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-20 15:05 ---
+1 on the idea of splitting off the cpanel discussion -- I agree it sounds like
different issues. we should at least keep this bug open, solely to work on the
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-18 16:23 ---
Good catch, Sebastian! POSIX::sigaction will, indeed, solve two problems:
- 1. deal with internal timeouts using SIGALRM overwriting our one
- 2. always use
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-19 10:56 ---
here is another one today...
child pid 9638 running for 5 min, 29 sec
- ALERT: spamd pid 9638 ran for 5 min, 29 sec and was killed!
i have that script running
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-19 11:31 ---
Subject: Re: [review] spamd parent stops accepting requests
On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 10:56:40AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this is twice i have caught a
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-19 11:53 ---
the last 2 hangs were on awl.. the others i'm not exactly sure because i didnt
have full debugging enabled. i've been running an strace -f with full debug
for
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-18 07:31 ---
No, I've actually created a patch using SigAction that I'm currently testing.
I'm not yet sure if it's actually
working ;-) I haven't yet had any timeout
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-18 07:39 ---
Created an attachment (id=2526)
-- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2526action=view)
Patch using POSIX::SigAction
This patch is basically the
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-18 07:44 ---
Will this patch of yours be able to be applied directly to the SpamAssassin
3.0.1 source, or will I have to apply the original patch by Dallas Engelken then
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-18 07:52 ---
My patch replaces the previous patches, i.e. it can be applied to a fresh 3.0.1
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-18 11:24 ---
Sebastian Hagedorn,
I applied your patch. I am crossing my fingers
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-17 10:34 ---
i got a copy of the email that hung on child pid 22626 at 11:39 am... thanks to
full debug and 1gig log files :)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] old]# ls -la *22626*
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-17 12:50 ---
hi Dallas - those strace lines don't match the debugs are you stracing the
children? use -f to follow through forks.
also kill -15 is safer than kill -9 for
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-17 13:07 ---
Dallas btw -- what's the CPU on that box? is it hyperthreaded?
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-17 13:18 ---
yes sir.. its a big one. 2 cpu, 2gig ram.
3:16pm up 22:03, 1 user, load average: 2.30, 1.43, 1.33
157 processes: 153 sleeping, 3 running, 1 zombie, 0
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-17 15:23 ---
+1
Please fix weird spacing around parens. :-)
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-14 16:58 ---
Looks good, but before I give a +1, I'd really like to see some type of
performance test under normal conditions to verify that there's no degradation.
Very
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-14 17:12 ---
it *should* certainly be possible ofr the rest of the mail system to carry
on resiliently even with spamd dead. But that's something you need to ask the
CPanel
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-14 17:39 ---
I am getting sick of having to reboot this damn box everytime SpamD takes a
shit.
You would think that this would force everything to die, right?
kill -9 `ps
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-15 04:32 ---
Hi,
the patch and the PERL_SIGNALS=unsafe workaround don't work for us, because we
are using Red Hat
Enterprise Linux 3. It comes with perl 5.8.0. The
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-15 11:28 ---
I just noticed (while running a spamd --help) that in my spamd patch above, the
part that adds those 2 new timeout options to the man and --help, it lists
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-15 11:43 ---
okay, the problem child was 2351. here is its life history.
12:28:54 - pid 2351 spawned.
12:28:58 - first message
12:31:31 - last log entry by pid 2351
12:45:01
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-15 11:54 ---
Dallas, have any ideas why when I try to kill those processes, they stick
around as zombies?
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-15 12:15 ---
are the zombies created only from ones that you kill when they hang, or is a
zombie created from any spamd child you kill?
--- You are receiving this mail
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-15 14:46 ---
'Wait a second, I think I stumbled upon something here. SpamD, at least on
our
servers, runs in a way that is linked to Exim. So, when Exim receives a mail
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-13 18:11 ---
Excuse me? Yes, Dallas' did help some, but it hasn't fixed everything. Are
you saying that you (Justin Mason) have some more to contribute to the patch?
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-13 18:18 ---
btw Tom -- I'd strongly suggest setting up a caching nameserver on localhost.
it'll greatly increase scanning speed; a localhost DNS access is much faster
than
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-13 18:25 ---
Tom: Dallas' patch helps fix part of the problem.
your bugs are possibly something else, but it's important to get one part out of
the way first.
I would
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-14 08:30 ---
tom, i think your problem is your setting for --timeout-child. move it from 10
seconds (i believe you said you were running with this in one post) to 30
seconds.
56 matches
Mail list logo
