Hi,
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 03:32:22PM -0500, Bob Apthorpe wrote:
If I wanted to analyzed a message using either SA 2.6x or 3.x, what do I
use to encapsulate that message aside from
Mail::SpamAssassin::NoMailAudit? That is, how do I have to
On Thursday 30 September 2004 18:50 CET Justin Mason wrote:
Bob Apthorpe writes:
That should gracefully handle both SA 2.x and 3.x, correct?
actually, it looks like we totally dropped the
Mail::SpamAssassin::NoMailAudit module entirely. When we were doing
this, I suggested we leave a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
actually, you're right on both; I just checked with perl -e in perl 5.8.4.
I must have been thinking of java instead of perl ;)
- --j.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3848
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
