http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4099
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-06 23:34 ---
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/ruleqa?s_details=ons_all=ondate=20050205rule=T_NO_RELAYSg=Change
0.629 0.0325 2.64820.012 0.62 -0.01 T_NO_RELAYS
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4099
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-26 16:59 ---
gotcha:
r56643 | felicity | 2004-11-04 18:54:04 -0800 (Thu, 04 Nov 2004) | 1 line
bug 3949: make ALL_TRUSTED test for 'only and at least 1 trusted relay', not
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4099
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-25 23:08 ---
ok, I've mass-checked 94142 ham messages with 3.0.0 and trunk.
the differences are entirely messages where there are NO received headers -- in
3.0.0 it's:
my
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4099
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-25 23:10 ---
Created an attachment (id=2630)
-- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2630action=view)
patch to restore 3.0.0 behaviour
here's the patch that
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4099
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-23 19:03 ---
Subject: Re: ALL_TRUSTED broken: barely hitting any ham
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 06:37:37PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Either, both. It used to hit much
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4099
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-23 19:16 ---
Subject: Re: ALL_TRUSTED broken: barely hitting any ham
I'm not really surprised by the current numbers. My corpus has very
little mail sent completely
