OK, for the mass-checks, we need to cut another prerelease, pre2.
I also think we should go R-T-C on the tree. Please vote.
- Vote for the cutting of pre2, a tarball to do mass-checks with.
- Vote to go R-T-C on svn trunk.
(I'm +1 on both)
--j.
Justin Mason wrote:
OK, for the mass-checks, we need to cut another prerelease, pre2.
I also think we should go R-T-C on the tree. Please vote.
- Vote for the cutting of pre2, a tarball to do mass-checks with.
- Vote to go R-T-C on svn trunk.
I would rather vote on an already generated
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 04:46:46PM -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
OK, for the mass-checks, we need to cut another prerelease, pre2.
I also think we should go R-T-C on the tree. Please vote.
- Vote for the cutting of pre2, a tarball to do mass-checks with.
+1
- Vote to go R-T-C on svn trunk.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Parker writes:
Justin Mason wrote:
OK, for the mass-checks, we need to cut another prerelease, pre2.
I also think we should go R-T-C on the tree. Please vote.
- Vote for the cutting of pre2, a tarball to do mass-checks with.
-
Justin Mason wrote:
please do!
http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.0-pre2.tar.gz
http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.0-pre2.tar.bz2
http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.0-pre2.zip
+1, tested on a couple of different