Henrik K wrote on 10/05/22 4:21 pm:
A quick hack to run it without taint, created t/perlcritic.t which contains:
#!/usr/bin/perl
$ENV{'PATH'} = '/bin:/usr/bin';
-d "xt" && "$^X xt/60_perlcritic.t" =~ /(.*)/ ||
"$^X ../xt/60_perlcritic.t" =~ /(.*)/;
exec($1);
That happened to work
Henrik K wrote on 10/05/22 4:21 pm:
A quick hack to run it without taint, created t/perlcritic.t which contains:
#!/usr/bin/perl
$ENV{'PATH'} = '/bin:/usr/bin';
-d "xt" && "$^X xt/60_perlcritic.t" =~ /(.*)/ ||
"$^X ../xt/60_perlcritic.t" =~ /(.*)/;
exec($1);
I submitted a bug
On 2022-05-10 at 00:21:36 UTC-0400 (Tue, 10 May 2022 07:21:36 +0300)
Henrik K
is rumored to have said:
A quick hack to run it without taint, created t/perlcritic.t which
contains:
#!/usr/bin/perl
$ENV{'PATH'} = '/bin:/usr/bin';
-d "xt" && "$^X xt/60_perlcritic.t" =~ /(.*)/ ||
"$^X
A quick hack to run it without taint, created t/perlcritic.t which contains:
#!/usr/bin/perl
$ENV{'PATH'} = '/bin:/usr/bin';
-d "xt" && "$^X xt/60_perlcritic.t" =~ /(.*)/ ||
"$^X ../xt/60_perlcritic.t" =~ /(.*)/;
exec($1);
Let me know if you think it can be committed. I'll atleast
