Theo Van Dinter writes:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 04:01:03PM -0500, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Do we have a rule scoring policy for rule updates yet?
Not really. I figured periodically (monthly?) we'd end up calling
on nightly/weekly submitters to run a special version (say, 3.1 with
the
Daniel Quinlan writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) writes:
As for the rule updates... Here's my thought. I propose we have the
rule updates be C-T-R to start. If that doesn't work out, we can change
to R-T-C easily. If no one vetos this proposal by 00:00 GMT on 2/28,
we'll take
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
As for the rule updates... Here's my thought. I propose we have the
rule updates be C-T-R to start. If that doesn't work out, we can change
to R-T-C easily. If no one vetos this proposal by 00:00 GMT on 2/28,
we'll take it as the initial policy for the rulesrc area.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 04:01:03PM -0500, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Do we have a rule scoring policy for rule updates yet?
Not really. I figured periodically (monthly?) we'd end up calling
on nightly/weekly submitters to run a special version (say, 3.1 with
the updates installed,) that we would
Theo Van Dinter writes:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 09:59:44AM +, Justin Mason wrote:
Theo Van Dinter writes:
I'd like to see us start publishing rule updates for 3.1 sometime here
in the near future. This got me to wondering what our policy should be
about it, specifically 3.1 code
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 09:59:44AM +, Justin Mason wrote:
Theo Van Dinter writes:
I'd like to see us start publishing rule updates for 3.1 sometime here
in the near future. This got me to wondering what our policy should be
about it, specifically 3.1 code is in R-T-C so should the
Theo Van Dinter writes:
I'd like to see us start publishing rule updates for 3.1 sometime here
in the near future. This got me to wondering what our policy should be
about it, specifically 3.1 code is in R-T-C so should the rules be also?
Based on history, I don't think we'll be able to get
I'd like to see us start publishing rule updates for 3.1 sometime here
in the near future. This got me to wondering what our policy should be
about it, specifically 3.1 code is in R-T-C so should the rules be also?
Based on history, I don't think we'll be able to get reviews fast enough.
