Re: Question about branching svn

2022-12-18 Thread Michael Peddemors
On 2022-12-18 14:01, Sidney Markowitz wrote: 3. We don't have a compelling reason to have to move to git, nor do we have committers clamoring to move to git, nor do we have a total consensus to move to git. +1 Change for changes sake? SVN might be a lower barrier to entry for contributors..

Re: Question about branching svn

2022-12-18 Thread Sidney Markowitz
Henrik K wrote on 19/12/22 5:43 am: Mass check runs from trunk, there are no ties to any specific version, aside from testing built rules.tar.gz with all 3.4 and 4.0 releases. It seems like 1. Branching svn would not impact mass check, which will continue to run from trunk 2. If we ever

Re: Question about branching svn

2022-12-18 Thread Henrik K
Mass check runs from trunk, there are no ties to any specific version, aside from testing built rules.tar.gz with all 3.4 and 4.0 releases. On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 08:51:29AM -0500, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > I don't think a branch would break things but my memory is that mass check is > built

Re: Question about branching svn

2022-12-18 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
I don't think a branch would break things but my memory is that mass check is built on 3.4 specifically. I think a lot of scripts and whatnot need to be updated. I am not a resource that remembers this just from a decade or so ago when I rebuilt the server. Henrik rebuilt it more recently so he

Re: Question about branching svn

2022-12-18 Thread Sidney Markowitz
Henrik K wrote on 18/12/22 8:18 pm: This is atleast third discussion of the same? All the previous times it was concluded that branching wasn't necessary. Backporting is a pain and usually something is forgotten. It's not like we have any real developing going on, does anyone even have a

Re: Question about branching svn

2022-12-17 Thread Henrik K
On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 09:42:08AM +1300, Sidney Markowitz wrote: > Now that we have released 4.0.0, we can if we want create a 4.0 branch and > have trunk be for a 4.1 branch. > > Pros: If we do it now, then if something comes up that is important enough > to require a 4.0.1 patch release, we

Re: Question about branching svn

2022-12-17 Thread Sidney Markowitz
Kevin A. McGrail wrote on 18/12/22 3:45 pm: One con is that we do need to get masscheck and various tools on the server to work with the new 4.0 release.  I'm not sure my eyesight is good enough to do it anymore but I'm happy to help! Questions: If I were to go ahead and branch, would that

Re: Question about branching svn

2022-12-17 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
We definitely should create a 4.0 branch and trunk becomes 4.1. I think there should be instructions in the build/README but it's been so long since we switched from 3.3 to 3.4, I'm not sure. One con is that we do need to get masscheck and various tools on the server to work with the new 4.0

Re: Question about branching svn

2022-12-17 Thread Bill Cole
On 2022-12-17 at 15:42:08 UTC-0500 (Sun, 18 Dec 2022 09:42:08 +1300) Sidney Markowitz is rumored to have said: Now that we have released 4.0.0, we can if we want create a 4.0 branch and have trunk be for a 4.1 branch. Pros: If we do it now, then if something comes up that is important

Re: Question about branching svn

2022-12-17 Thread Sidney Markowitz
Sidney Markowitz wrote on 18/12/22 9:42 am: > Now that we have released 4.0.0, we can if we want create a 4.0 branch > and have trunk be for a 4.1 branch. Or an alternative that just came to mind: Is this perhaps the time for us to switch from svn to git? We already have the git mirror of svn

Question about branching svn

2022-12-17 Thread Sidney Markowitz
Now that we have released 4.0.0, we can if we want create a 4.0 branch and have trunk be for a 4.1 branch. Pros: If we do it now, then if something comes up that is important enough to require a 4.0.1 patch release, we will not have commits already in svn that are not suitable for being