Since we have no full rules, and in fact we actively discourage people
from writing/using full rules, I'd like to see the functionality get
moved into a plugin which is off by default.
Thoughts?
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
What about WRITING it first and rationalizing it afterwords? :-)
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
Since we have no full rules, and in fact we actively discourage people
from writing/using full rules, I'd like to see the functionality get
moved into a plugin which is off by default.
Moving the functionality into a plugin is part of bug 4778. The status
of that is
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 10:19:07AM -0800, John Myers wrote:
I'm not so big on turning off the functionality. We shouldn't erect
barriers against our being able to later publish full rules through
sa-update.
My POV is that we will never publish full rules again (so far, everything
we would
Theo Van Dinter writes:
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 10:19:07AM -0800, John Myers wrote:
I'm not so big on turning off the functionality. We shouldn't erect
barriers against our being able to later publish full rules through
sa-update.
My POV is that we will never publish full rules again
Justin Mason wrote:
Theo Van Dinter writes:
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 10:19:07AM -0800, John Myers wrote:
I'm not so big on turning off the functionality. We shouldn't erect
barriers against our being able to later publish full rules through
sa-update.
My POV is that we will never publish
Doc Schneider wrote:
Justin Mason wrote:
Theo Van Dinter writes:
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 10:19:07AM -0800, John Myers wrote:
I'm not so big on turning off the functionality. We shouldn't erect
barriers against our being able to later publish full rules through
sa-update.
My POV is that we
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 08:49:56PM +, Justin Mason wrote:
*We* may not have full rules in the core ruleset, but I'm pretty sure SARE
and other third parties have a few. SpamAssassin isn't just a bundled set
of rules -- it's a platform, too ;) Changing the platform -- in
a backwards
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
I have no
evidence for this, but if full rules are helping cause problems such as
high memory use and large scan times (and it's certainly possible because
we all know how inefficient full rules are and have been -- that's why we
stopped using them in the first place),
Doc Schneider writes:
D'Oh! I meant Justin not Jason. His jmason always throws me. ::thud::
heh, I've given up noticing that long ago ;)
--j.
