Shouldn't ignore_received_spf_header default to 1?

2011-04-21 Thread darxus
By default, it seems SA will honor Received-SPF headers, while I would guess most people aren't inserting it at their MTA, so it's a great opportunity for spammers to forge the header to say their email passed SPF. So, shouldn't it be disabled by default, by setting ignore_received_spf_header to

Re: Shouldn't ignore_received_spf_header default to 1?

2011-04-21 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 12:55:38 -0400, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote: By default, it seems SA will honor Received-SPF headers, while I would guess most people aren't inserting it at their MTA, so it's a great opportunity for spammers to forge the header to say their email passed SPF. this header

Re: Shouldn't ignore_received_spf_header default to 1?

2011-04-21 Thread darxus
I meant to link to the relevant docs: http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.3.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_SPF On 04/21, Benny Pedersen wrote: this header could be removed in mta, and readded if spf pass in mta, its just not any stable milters that does it so far, but if headers is removed

Re: Shouldn't ignore_received_spf_header default to 1?

2011-04-21 Thread darxus
Yep, I have a bunch of emails where google inserted a Received-SPF: pass header that didn't hit SA's SPF_PASS rule. Then I started inserting that header myself, and it hits SPF_PASS. So it is ignoring Received-SPF headers from non-local relays. Nicely done. (The ignore_received_spf_header

Re: Shouldn't ignore_received_spf_header default to 1?

2011-04-21 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 13:36:16 -0400, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote: Ohh, sounds like it might ignore anything added before an internal relay, so the current default is fine? this mail have: Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=140.211.11.3;

Re: Shouldn't ignore_received_spf_header default to 1?

2011-04-21 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
On 21/04/2011 1:41 PM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote: Yep, I have a bunch of emails where google inserted a Received-SPF: pass header that didn't hit SA's SPF_PASS rule. Then I started inserting that header myself, and it hits SPF_PASS. So it is ignoring Received-SPF headers from non-local