Re: Wiki organization

2004-09-30 Thread Daniel Quinlan
Kenneth Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: There was a post today about recording versions of software compatible with SA3 (eg. MIMEDefang) in the Wiki. I went to look where such a thing might go and see top-level items for Using SA and Using SA with Procmail when the latter should be part

Wiki organization

2004-09-29 Thread Daniel Quinlan
I think we need to pay attention to the overall organization of wiki pages. For example, there are a zillion Bayes pages with overlapping information and not much organization. * BayesAccuracy * BayesBitMe * BayesFaq * BayesFeedbackViaForwarding * BayesInSpamAssassin *

Re: Wiki organization

2004-09-29 Thread Michael Parker
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 08:39:41PM -0700, Daniel Quinlan wrote: I think we need to pay attention to the overall organization of wiki pages. For example, there are a zillion Bayes pages with overlapping information and not much organization. I think this would be a good users list post.

Re: Wiki organization

2004-09-29 Thread Malte S. Stretz
On Wednesday 29 September 2004 05:39 CET Daniel Quinlan wrote: [...] In addition, there's not quite enough design in terms of the high-level organization. I'm wondering if we shouldn't try to structure most of the documentation in terms of areas (in terms of how users think of things,