http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3886
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-20 17:19 ---
Subject: Re: update URIBL whitelist with persistent high volume only
How many days should we try to cover?
I'd say 3 months should be about right.
Daniel
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3826
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-20 20:56 ---
+1
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3706
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.0.1 |3.1.0
--- Additional
I'd like to get 3.0.1 released in the next few days. There are 2 tickets left
in the queue: can we get them done up in the next day or so?
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
It takes a village to raise an idiot, but an idiot can raze a village
- Unknown
pgp8DkiywMnjm.pgp
Description: PGP
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3706
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3839
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl's refcounting may be |increase amount of memory
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3826
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-20 22:19 ---
+1 -- looks good ;)
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3839
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-20 22:27 ---
after discussing with perl5-porters, there was a suggestion as to what's
happening:
- spamd starts and reads config until 20MB ram is allocated
- clears up and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Parker writes:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 12:01:20AM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
I'd like to get 3.0.1 released in the next few days. There are 2 tickets
left
in the queue: can we get them done up in the next day or so?
+1 on a
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3914
Summary: No X-Spam headers created due to uninitialized values
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3494
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3914
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
On 21 Oct 2004, at 06:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
- spamd starts and reads config until 20MB ram is allocated
- clears up and frees memory, leaving ~10MB in use (but 20MB allocated
to the
process)
- forks children. each child gets a copy-on-write copy of that 20MB,
including 10MB of allocated
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3826
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3822
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-21 15:20 ---
Created an attachment (id=2467)
-- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2467action=view)
proposed patch to fix
I think we should only warn for
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3822
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-21 15:24 ---
yeah, ok: +1
I'd prefer an external script, I think our Makefile.PL is bloated. but if it
works, hey, that's good ;)
--- You are receiving this mail
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3822
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-21 15:25 ---
Makefile.PL may be bloated, but it is the right place to fix this.
If Makefile.PL is bloated, we should break it up or clean it up somehow,
not add more scripts
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3868
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3822
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-21 15:29 ---
Subject: Re: [review] warn during make if module versions are too low
+1
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3822
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3841
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-21 15:35 ---
This should be fixed in trunk now. John, can you test out SVN trunk
to see if that solves the problem for you?
--- You are receiving this mail because:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3841
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|Future |3.1.0
--- Additional
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3915
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-21 15:40 ---
additional information:
it seems only happend if given message is spam, and isn't classified by
spamassassin as spam (has less then 5 points).
if it's normal
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3915
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-21 15:50 ---
not having a bayes hit is not necessarily a bug. you need to run the
message(s) through spamassassin
in debug mode (-D) and see what's coming up. it could
24 matches
Mail list logo