http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-18 16:23 ---
Good catch, Sebastian! POSIX::sigaction will, indeed, solve two problems:
- 1. deal with internal timeouts using SIGALRM overwriting our one
- 2. always use
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-18 16:42 ---
Narrowing it down just a little bit more: I modified the server in the last
attachment to cache the first message it receives and then keep using that. I
then
So, we were discussing the rules situation -- ie. that we've been pretty
crap at getting rules into the distro. I proposed this, and I think we're
reasonably into the idea as a way to help out.
We add a web-app somewhere that periodically scrapes bugzilla
for bugs on the rules component which
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3813
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- You
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3983
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-18 19:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=2527)
-- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2527action=view)
implementation
here's the impl. I'll check this into
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3967
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-18 21:42 ---
Subject: Re: [review] DOS E-Mail Message
+1 on those two rule fixes
+1 ditto
Do we want to add a protective rule for long URLs like we did for long
headers?
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3771
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-18 22:36 ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/18/2004 3:38 PM, Michael Parker wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 06:53:19AM -0800, Rupa Schomaker wrote:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3771
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-18 22:37 ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oh, forgot something. The patch doesn't create an index on
bayes_seen(msgid) -- probably should.
- --
-Rupa
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3771
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-18 22:48 ---
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Specific Bayes Storage Module
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 10:36:45PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some questions:
Is bytea really
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3771
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-18 23:42 ---
On 11/18/2004 10:48 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leave it as bytea...
Interesting, I think my main concern was the fact that BYTEA was the
only way to make
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3771
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-19 00:03 ---
Spoke too soon. Relying on the PK index in either order resulted in seqscans in
all cases. Very weird -- not gonna track that down. Created non-unique indices
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 9:16 PM
To: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: proposal: an automated rule-qa system
*SNIP*
We add a web-app somewhere that periodically scrapes bugzilla
for bugs on the rules
I think this is a great idea.. It may also be useful, if this is going to
be automated to have buckets for the rules based on the output of mass
checks.
Something like agressive rules, netrual rules, and lenient rules based on
their catching of spam/ham.
That way someone grabbing them that
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3984
Summary: Use of uninitialized value in pattern match
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3975
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-19 10:59 ---
Looking at the code, I see that the tests use port 48373. I suppose that an
unprivileged port was needed so that the tests could be run by normal users.
The port
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-19 10:56 ---
here is another one today...
child pid 9638 running for 5 min, 29 sec
- ALERT: spamd pid 9638 ran for 5 min, 29 sec and was killed!
i have that script running
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-19 11:31 ---
Subject: Re: [review] spamd parent stops accepting requests
On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 10:56:40AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this is twice i have caught a
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-19 11:53 ---
the last 2 hangs were on awl.. the others i'm not exactly sure because i didnt
have full debugging enabled. i've been running an strace -f with full debug
for
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3967
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-19 12:15 ---
Subject: Re: [review] large numbers of redirectors can cause slowness in a few
rules
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 09:42:52PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do we
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3984
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-19 12:22 ---
Subject: Re: New: Use of uninitialized value in pattern match
On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 10:04:08AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Version: SVN Trunk
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #2513 is|0 |1
obsolete|
I am begining to build a Java Libray to act as a client to spamd, not using JNI however. Has anyone ever done something similar and if so what are the roadblocks that you have come across.
thanks.
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! Get yours free!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kurt Humes writes:
I am begining to build a Java Libray to act as a client to spamd, not
using JNI however. Has anyone ever done something similar and if so
what are the roadblocks that you have come across.
Kurt, I'm unaware of anything, but it
23 matches
Mail list logo
