-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Author: quinlan
Date: Mon Dec 13 16:39:58 2004
New Revision: 111767
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=111767
Log:
remove Flex Hex rules due to low accuracy
what were the results?
- --j.
Modified:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4029
Summary: RFE: Handle spammer backscatter (rfc1894 DSN bounce
reports)
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.1
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Justin Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
remove Flex Hex rules due to low accuracy
what were the results?
http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/DETAILS.new
0.410 0.3699 1.29030.223 0.450.01 T_HTML_COLOR_FLEX_HEX_3
0.466 0.4103 1.67620.197 0.410.01
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4030
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-13 19:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=2564)
-- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2564action=view)
fix
--- You are receiving this mail because:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[review] spamd parent stops |spamd parent stops accepting
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4015
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-13 19:08 ---
+1
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4030
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-13 22:21 ---
Subject: Re: [review] incapable Net::DNS module usage should be a warning, not
a debug
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there any possibility old Net::DNS
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2788
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4026
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- You
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4026
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-14 03:20 ---
I observe the same behaviour on a FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE box. Apparently, after --
max-conn-per-child has run out for *all* children, a new child is spawned for
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4022
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3983
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-14 07:06 ---
Am I correct in assuming that the child states mean something like: I = idle,
B = busy, K = killed but waiting for something before being forgotten? We went
from
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4031
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
Summary: Not sure if this is a bug or not ...
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.1
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 09:58:56AM -0800, Justin Mason wrote:
oh btw I upgraded this to 0.6.2 yesterday, which is supposed
to handle NATted slaves better... sidney, michael, could
you try upgrading your slaves?
Yeah, I upgraded both of my slaves as well and it was still showing
the
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4022
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-14 11:06 ---
Correct me if I'm wrong:
If you start spamd with -u user it will *always* run as user, regardless of
the actual user that comes from spamc. From the manpage: If
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-14 11:17 ---
yep -- it's something you need to deal with in the MTA side, when it sets the
spamc command line switch.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3971
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-14 12:15 ---
I've been using what I have described here for a few weeks here myself now for
some time, and it works for me. Using the bayesian db works great, learning and
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3826
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-14 13:02 ---
drat, you're dead right, that should be is_admin = 1.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4026
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-14 13:03 ---
Helge - I don't understand.
each child should exit once it hits the max-conn-per-child limit, and the server
will immediately respawn a new one to replace it.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3983
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-14 14:20 ---
Ah! I think that there may be a race condition. I changed the line
dbg (prefork: adjust: decreasing, too many idle children ($num_idle
$self-{max_idle}),
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4026
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-14 14:25 ---
It's worse for me. As said, the processes respawn immediately _without_ doing
anything. They do not process even a single request. Which is how this bug got
my
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4026
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-14 15:03 ---
ok, could we split this double-bug into two separate bugs, then ;) if they
turn out to be the same issue, it's easy to merge them again. But in the
meantime,
24 matches
Mail list logo
