[Bug 4042] New: _score_ has lost the leading zero

2004-12-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4042 Summary: _score_ has lost the leading zero Product: Spamassassin Version: 3.0.1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

RFC: New Plugin Hook

2004-12-18 Thread Michael Parker
Howdy, I was looking at a possible solution to: http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3215 and decided that it could be done pretty easily if I had a new plugin hook. So, I created one, I wanted to get y'all opinion on it before I went forward. The new plugin is verify_user which

Re: RFC: New Plugin Hook

2004-12-18 Thread Justin Mason
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 makes sense to me. I'd (a) expand the doco, and (b) use a better name than verify_user for the method, as it took a while for me to grok it. rather than verify_user, how's about service_acl_allows_username or similar? - --j. Michael Parker

[Bug 2235] Body Tests for Spaced-Out Words

2004-12-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2235 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Additional

[Bug 3826] spamd keeps user_prefs between scans with different users

2004-12-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3826 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 3826] spamd keeps user_prefs between scans with different users

2004-12-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3826 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug 4041] Users can load plugins

2004-12-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-17 17:32 --- Subject: Re: New: Users can load plugins On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 03:32:25PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Calling loadplugin from user_prefs works despite

Re: RFC: New Plugin Hook

2004-12-18 Thread Michael Parker
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 04:41:51PM -0800, Justin Mason wrote: makes sense to me. I'd (a) expand the doco, and (b) use a better name than verify_user for the method, as it took a while for me to grok it. rather than verify_user, how's about service_acl_allows_username or similar?

[Bug 4042] _score_ has lost the leading zero

2004-12-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4042 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 3436] Spams from 'own domain' make it through

2004-12-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3436 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 3302] Dynamic IP and Squirrelmail

2004-12-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3302 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

Re: [Bug 3826] spamd keeps user_prefs between scans with different users

2004-12-18 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Any idea where those reports might me? I assume they were reported after the 3.0.1 release. Do you know which config options weren't being cleared correctly?

[Bug 3826] spamd keeps user_prefs between scans with different users

2004-12-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-17 17:47 --- Subject: Re: spamd keeps user_prefs between scans with different users Any idea where those reports might me? I assume they were reported after the 3.0.1

[Bug 3200] new rules: dynamic/no-rDNS-for-IP

2004-12-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||mc --- Additional Comments

[Bug 4041] Users can load plugins

2004-12-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-17 17:48 --- I don't know. I don't have spamd setup to test with. Even if it only happens with spamassassin, it should probably at least give a warning since it is contrary

Re: RFC: New Plugin Hook

2004-12-18 Thread Justin Mason
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael Parker writes: On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 05:38:26PM -0800, Justin Mason wrote: ok -- service_allowed_for_username -- there's only one service for each call. ;) Why put that sort of restriction? what if I wanted something like:

[Bug 3826] spamd keeps user_prefs between scans with different users

2004-12-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-17 17:52 --- Subject: Re: spamd keeps user_prefs between scans with different users On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 05:47:40PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any idea where

[Bug 3826] spamd keeps user_prefs between scans with different users

2004-12-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-17 17:57 --- Subject: Re: spamd keeps user_prefs between scans with different users My fix, that Justin committed, resolves Dean's problem. --- You are receiving

[Bug 4041] Users can load plugins

2004-12-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-17 17:57 --- Subject: Re: Users can load plugins On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 05:48:51PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Even if it only happens with spamassassin, it should

Re: RFC: New Plugin Hook

2004-12-18 Thread Justin Mason
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael Parker writes: On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 04:41:51PM -0800, Justin Mason wrote: makes sense to me. I'd (a) expand the doco, and (b) use a better name than verify_user for the method, as it took a while for me to grok it. rather

[Bug 4041] Users can load plugins

2004-12-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-17 18:11 --- well, I think we should add some doco about it, if it's not already there. but -- whew! ;) --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the

[Bug 3302] Dynamic IP and Squirrelmail

2004-12-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3302 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-17 18:12 --- thinking: yes, it probably would be. I didn't want to do that as part of that bug, though, to avoid confusing the issues. only issue I can think of is that some

[Bug 4040] 30_text_de.cf brings up error message

2004-12-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4040 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-17 18:39 --- Personally, I would be very happy to see the length restrictions on descriptions and rule names disappear. IMO, they were a mistake: 1. they have resulted in

[Bug 3826] spamd keeps user_prefs between scans with different users

2004-12-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3826 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

Re: [Bug 4040] 30_text_de.cf brings up error message

2004-12-18 Thread Loren Wilton
I do not agree with this conclusion. As I already commented on another bug ([Bug 3085] TRACKER_ID rule not very useful) some languages simply use longer words/sentences (on average) than English. Having no short and accurate translations of many/most computer related English terms complicates the

[Bug 4040] 30_text_de.cf brings up error message

2004-12-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4040 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-17 20:11 --- Subject: Re: 30_text_de.cf brings up error message I do not agree with this conclusion. As I already commented on another bug ([Bug 3085] TRACKER_ID rule not

Re: buildbot failure in [...]

2004-12-18 Thread Daniel Quinlan
Sidney Markowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'll look at that after I come back. If you haven't already, could you disable the tests on any systems that might fail between now and then? Thanks. :-) Daniel -- Daniel Quinlan http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/

Re: [Bug 3200] new rules: dynamic/no-rDNS-for-IP

2004-12-18 Thread Daniel Quinlan
NEEDSMC Cool. *wink* *wink* I suggest: /^(header|rawbody|body|full|uri|meta)\s+(\S+)\s+(.*)/ Daniel -- Daniel Quinlan http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/

[Bug 4043] New: Starting with SA 3.x, more spam does not get detected

2004-12-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4043 Summary: Starting with SA 3.x, more spam does not get detected Product: Spamassassin Version: 3.0.1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug 4043] Starting with SA 3.x, more spam does not get detected

2004-12-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4043 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-18 00:05 --- Created an attachment (id=2572) -- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2572action=view) spam message not being recognized For this message, I

Re: [Bug 4040] 30_text_de.cf brings up error message

2004-12-18 Thread Daniel Quinlan
I'd accept a patch to remove the restriction for lang != en (standard disclaimers apply). Daniel -- Daniel Quinlan http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/

[Bug 4040] 30_text_de.cf brings up error message

2004-12-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4040 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-18 00:45 --- Subject: Re: 30_text_de.cf brings up error message I'd accept a patch to remove the restriction for lang != en (standard disclaimers apply). Daniel

[Bug 4043] Starting with SA 3.x, more spam does not get detected

2004-12-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4043 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

Re: buildbot failure in [...]

2004-12-18 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 04:31:54PM +, Nix wrote: don't multiply it by more than, say, ten. If SA goes fifty days without a commit something is very wrong. :) I know nothing about buildbot (haven't had time to look into it), but is there some way the server can keep track of the commits, and

[Bug 4028] memleak in libspamc.c

2004-12-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4028 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-18 11:56 --- Created an attachment (id=2573) -- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2573action=view) Patch to libspamc that is easier to be sure has no memory

Make test failure in SPF test

2004-12-18 Thread Sidney Markowitz
I'm seeing the following in make test in the spf test. It doesn't show in the buildbot test because they skip SPF. (As an aside, why do they skip it?) $ t/spf.t 1..2 # Running under perl version 5.008005 for cygwin # Current time local: Sun Dec 19 09:49:57 2004 # Current time GMT: Sat Dec 18

[Bug 4044] New: make test, SPF test failing

2004-12-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4044 Summary: make test, SPF test failing Product: Spamassassin Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version) Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal

Re: Make test failure in SPF test

2004-12-18 Thread Thomas Schulz
I'm seeing the following in make test in the spf test. It doesn't show in the buildbot test because they skip SPF. (As an aside, why do they skip it?) $ t/spf.t 1..2 # Running under perl version 5.008005 for cygwin # Current time local: Sun Dec 19 09:49:57 2004 # Current time GMT:

Re: buildbot failure in [...]

2004-12-18 Thread Sidney Markowitz
I had a power glitch here which rebooted the server. I think it happened in the middle of the svn update causing all three slave jobs to fail, and I think that it was a power glitch that caused the reboot. I'm not going to bother to bring the buildbot slaves online again before I leave on