On 01/12, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
That address is correct. We will handle your request shortly. Thanks for
contributing, and sorry for the lag of a few days.
Is there a reason not to automate this? Create a web page to get an rsync
account that asks for a username and password, and creates
$ ~/nightlymc/trunk/masses/rule-qa/corpus-nightly
...
+ rsync -Pcvuzb --timeout=120 spam-darxus.log ham-darxus.log
dar...@rsync.spamassassin.org::corpus/
...
skipping non-regular file ham-darxus.log
skipping non-regular file spam-darxus.log
sent 62 bytes received 12 bytes 29.60 bytes/sec
On 01/19, Justin Mason wrote:
hmm -- works fine for me. what does ls -l spam-darxus.log look like
in the masses dir? mine looks like:
It was a symbolic link, which is why --copy-links made it work.
Warren's script may be worth a try though ;)
Yeah, it seems to be working, and I've added
-darxus.log spam-darxus.log
dar...@rsync.spamassassin.org::corpus/
Run at:
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 04:00:28 -0500 (EST)
$ pwd ; wc -l *.log
/home/darxus/masscheckwork/nightly_mass_check/masses
1071 ham-darxus.log
6 spam-darxus.log
--
Of course there's strength in numbers. But there's strength
On 01/20, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
I'm not allowed to edit
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/NightlyMassCheck
Can somebody else add auto-mass-check to it?
Can I have write access to that page? My username is Darxus.
--
...extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice
- Barry Morris
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20110122rule=%2FDNSWL
MSECSSPAM% HAM% S/ORANK SCORE NAME WHO/AGE
0 0.0111 17.8052 0.0010.880.00 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI
0 0.0294 12.1266 0.0020.810.00 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED
0 0.0235 6.4141
On 01/23, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
I believe __RCVD_IN_DNSWL should include the rest of these rules? So
assuming HI, MED, LOW, and NONE have the right numbers, __RCVD_IN_DNSWL
should be .3936% of spam (not 0.1320%), and 46.6180% of ham (not 20.2586%)?
That could be my fault. I'm not
Any news on when we will have a mailing list for people submitting
mass-check data?
Scores for all the tests are based on data from mass checks and a
required_score of 5. The default required_score in SA installs is 5. That
makes sense.
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.3.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html
recommends against using a required_score of 5 for anything but a
On 03/01, Jason Bertoch wrote:
I haven't spent any time over the years reading ruleqa results, but
is it normal for a rule's S/O to bounce all over the place from week
to week, or is that an indication of a problem in the testing
RuleQA results are incredibly noisy:
-trec_enron.
Missing spam-net-bb-zmi.
Missing spam-net-grenier.
20110129
Missing ham-net-kgolding.
Missing spam-net-kgolding.
20110205
Missing ham-net-llanga.
Missing ham-net-wt-hamtrap-en.
Missing spam-net-llanga.
Missing spam-net-wt-hamtrap-en.
20110212
Missing ham-net-darxus.
Missing ham-net
On 03/02, John Hardin wrote:
Is the desire for distributed processing stronger than the desire
for consistent results? I'd suggest at least part of the problem
could be addressed by uploading the spam corpora and letting the
central masscheck chew on it. Automating the collect-expire-upload
I noticed 72_active.cf is missing from the rules in trunk. It looks like
its creation is missing from http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RunningGa ?
Should this be added to that page?
trunk$ build/mkrules --src rulesrc --out rules
For this week:
20110305
Missing ham-net-danmcdonald.
Missing ham-net-nbebout.
Missing spam-net-danmcdonald.
Missing spam-net-nbebout.
The graph of total spam and ham counts in the corpora:
http://www.chaosreigns.com/dnswl/tot.svg
The data file:
%
2.0785 bb-jhardin
0.3802 kgolding
0.1582 bernie-mix
0.1186 grenier
0.0065 - average
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED:
SPAM%
20.2532 bernie-mix
2.0408 darxus
1.5012 bb-jhardin
1.0186 jarif
0.4615 wt-en1
0.3802 kgolding
0.3363 bb-guenther_fraud
0.3109 bb-jhardin_fraud
On 03/06, John Hardin wrote:
My corpora include messages from several different mail paths, and
all of my corpora masschecks are done against uploaded corpora on
the SA/Apache servers. How are we to provide trusted_networks data
in that scenario?
(That's something I've been mildly curious
On 03/06, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 13:07 -0500, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED:
SPAM%
0.3363 bb-guenther_fraud
0.3109 bb-jhardin_fraud
0.0550 - average
I just checked mine -- sure enough, yes, they ARE spam.
I'm not
On 03/06, John Hardin wrote:
If so, that wouldn't apply to just me. The entire upload a corpus
for central scanning wouldn't be a valid model at all. That it is
being done suggests otherwise and I just don't understand how that
part of it works.
That is a fascinating and dangerous assumption,
On 03/07, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hello Karsten Bräckelmann,
Am 2011-03-07 18:44:07, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
You have a track record of going ballistic on the users list over spam
waves every once in a while, which more than once [1] turned out to be a
problem with a single,
.)
This morning it didn't happen. mass-check ran, my logs rsynced up, and I
still had a working internet connection.
But I noticed a change I made didn't work (adding darxus-trap), so I
ran mass-check again.
And my internet connection died.
Comcast wasn't triggering my internet connection to die. mass
Date HamSpam Ham change Spam Change
20110226 263567 512001
20110305 203478 354465-28.4% -30.0%
20110312 145085 300673-28.7% -15.2%
45% reduction in ham corpora over two weeks. At this rate, we'll have no
ham corpora in 3 weeks :P
Everybody who submitted corpora
On 03/13, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
SA does not block mail, and we do not run a blacklist of our own. (Thus,
we cannot remove a sender from it, which even is a prominent answer on
the wiki.) The fundamental concept of a scoring system, with no rule's
score above the threshold, effectively
Error happened on March 12th. Notification sent to me on March 14th.
The only reason I noticed this is because I recently stopped blocking the
range of messages that trigger this kind of thing.
- Forwarded message from dev-h...@spamassassin.apache.org -
Date: 14 Mar 2011 06:14:18 -
It looks like the list has been created, rul...@spamassassin.apache.org?
Do we still need to wait for somebody to subscribe all the participants?
--
Whom God wishes to destroy, he first makes mad.
- Euripides (c.480 - 406 BC).
http://www.ChaosReigns.com
On 03/19, bugzilla-dae...@issues.apache.org wrote:
Thanks, Darxus. However... That was not a request for the ability to report.
That was a complaint about DNSWL hits downscoring spam, just below the
threshold.
He wasn't one of the people I was referring to requesting abuse reporting
ability
On 03/20, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
While I really appreciate you trying to keep bugzilla clean (yes, really
really :), this probably would have belonged to bugzilla...
Okay.
Then WHY was that the one and only mentioning and link of requests? In
your own words, There were requests for
Date HamSpam Ham change Spam Change
20110226 263567 512001
20110305 203478 354465-28.4% -30.0%
20110312 159842 297169-21.4% -16.2%
20110319 185312 218995+15.9% -26.3%
Woo, positive change in ham. Now its only spam that we won't have any of
in three weeks
On 03/20, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
Date HamSpam Ham change Spam Change
20110226 263567 512001
20110305 203478 354465-28.4% -30.0%
20110312 159842 297169-21.4% -16.2%
20110319 185312 218995+15.9% -26.3%
Woo, positive change in ham. Now its only
--exclude '*~' -vaz dar...@rsync.spamassassin.org::corpus
/home/darxus/sa/corp
./log-grep-recent -m 72 `grep -l '^# SVN revision: 1083147$'
~/sa/corp/ham-net-*.log` ~/sa/ham-full.log
./log-grep-recent -m 2 `grep -l '^# SVN revision: 1083147$'
~/sa/corp/spam-net-*.log` ~/sa/spam-full.log
wc -l ~/sa
You are listed as the contact for a SpamAssassin plugin on
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomPlugins
Please update your description of your SpamAssassin plugin on
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomPlugins to change the line
Updated: Old to Updated: -MM-DD to represent today's
On 03/21, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 21:06 -0400, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
Please update your description of your SpamAssassin plugin on
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomPlugins to change the line
Updated: Old to Updated: -MM-DD to represent today's
On 03/21, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 22:33 -0400, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
Please update your description of your SpamAssassin plugin on
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomPlugins to change the line
Updated: Old to Updated: -MM-DD to represent
On 03/21, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Now on to the gazillion similar requests and questions stuck in the
list's moderation queue. *sigh*
Gazillian?
I replied to Eric Lubow, Battista Biggio and Cord Beermann, who were the
only other people I got similar replies from.
--
Whom God wishes to
On 03/22, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 12:42 -0400, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 03/21, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Please update your description of your SpamAssassin plugin on
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomPlugins to change the line
No updates since 2011-03-21.
--
When we remember we are all mad, the mysteries of life disappear and
life stands explained. - Mark Twain
http://www.ChaosReigns.com
What's the best way, taking advantage of existing SA code, to get the last
untrusted relay from an email (for use with black lists and white lists),
without going through scoring?
This is the one option I've gotten to work:
http://www.chaosreigns.com/iprep/dl/received.pl
It unfolds the Received
I'm not all that curious about the fact that they put their plugin at the
top, out of chronological order, again.
What I'm curious about is the change of the Added date, to 8 months
earlier. Is it a coincidence that after I put them back in chronological
order, if I had used the new date they
It just occurred to me that they might have done that to harvest IPs of
people looking into spam filtering software. I would have just copied the
image up to the wiki and embedded that, but I don't think it's worth asking
them for permission.
--
Blessed are they who, in the face of death, think
On 04/01, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
My guess, just as yours, would be the previous date to be correct. But
It's not a guess, I added all 49 of those Added: lines based on the
wiki edit history. And I checked that one again before changing it.
(After all, the date change can be found in the
On 04/01, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
My only comment on this is rather with the Maintained date.
Maintained means little if the plugin hasn't been updated for years
but continues to work with modern spamassassin versions. How about
Maintained DATE tested with spamassassin-3.3.1?
That would, of
Over half the lines in this are due entirely to a lack of sorting.
Number of body rules changes:
$ cat sought.txt | grep ^.body __ | wc -l
455
Number of body rules changes that weren't just removing and re-adding
the same rule:
$ cat sought.txt | grep ^.body __ | awk '{print $2}' | sort | uniq
Short version, since this got long: Should I clean up the rule sets page
( http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomRulesets )?
In October, dnswl.org started requiring payment from sites hitting it more
than 100,000 times per day. I've been involved in dnswl.org since 2006,
I've been an
Do you actually move all your hams from your inbox to a separate
confirmed ham folder?
Or do you only run mass-check manually, just after verifying everything
in your inbox is ham?
Or do you just run mass-check from cron with your inbox listed as ham, in
hopes that you usually won't get a spam
On 04/07, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
All of my incoming mail is CC'ed to a separate account, and all
sorting is done within that account. The masscheck ham folder is
entirely separate from my Inbox.
So if you get a spam that SA misses, you need to delete it twice, in
your inbox and your
On 03/31, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
On 03/26/2011 06:09 PM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
No updates since 2011-03-21.
I took a quick look on the spamassassin2 server.
/exports/home/ruleqadb/ indeed shows March 21st as the last day logs
were copied. freqsd is dead. I am unable to dig
On 04/10, John Hardin wrote:
I found an old email listing the stuff on spamassassin2, freqsd
seems to be restarted. We'll see.
Should that go up on the wiki?
--
theres a lot more to life than chicks
none of it matters but theres a lot of it
- LeRoy, #motorcycles, #EFNet, 7/18/06
On 04/10, John Hardin wrote:
woohoo! It appears to be working!
Thank you.
--
He who dies with the most toys... still dies. - No Fear
http://www.ChaosReigns.com
Nightly mass-checks use
rsync://rsync.spamassassin.org/tagged_builds/nightly_mass_check
Weekly mass-checks use
rsync://rsync.spamassassin.org/tagged_builds/weekly_mass_check
Why are they different? Wouldn't it be better for them to be the same, for
consistency?
--
Let's just say that if
On 03/30, Adam Katz wrote:
Be careful about measuring the usefulness of that data; you'll have to
measure samples against each other, and even then you will have
imperfect results.
If this ever gets added to the mass-check tests, I'll be more than happy to
create a separate set of the data
On 04/12, Greg Troxel wrote:
Do you mean rules like KHOP_DNSBL_BUMP and KHOP_DNSBL_ADJ?
I think so.
The current score-setting algorithm seems to assume orthogonal rules, or
rather a set of rules that test independent properties. DNSBLs (and
DNSWLs) are fundamentally different, because they
The Debian and Ubuntu packages of SpamAssassin apply 7 patches. Should
these be applied to upstream?
Applied in order:
10_change_config_paths - Changes all instances of /etc/mail/spamassassin to
/etc/spamassassin.
20_edit_spamc_pod - Changes the man page for spampd from section 1 of man to
I believe I have daily builds properly set up for Ubuntu. To use it:
apt-get install python-software-properties # the add-apt-repository command
add-apt-repository ppa:darxus/spamassassin-daily
apt-get update
apt-get install spamassassin spamc
It's building for Karmic (9.10), Lucid (10.04),
20110416
Missing ham-net-jm - last seen 20110401.
Missing ham-net-wt-hamtrap-en - last seen 20110129.
Missing ham-net-llanga - last seen 20110129.
Missing ham-net-bb-zmi - last seen 20110115.
Missing ham-net-bb-trec_enron - last seen 20110115.
Missing ham-net-bb-kmcgrail - last seen 20110115.
On 04/21, Henrik Krohns wrote:
Then again the personal email is easily found in email archives..
Then please find me the personal email for mass-check submitter llanga.
This is the person who most recently stopped doing mass-checks, and I'd
like to contact them. They haven't posted (with that
By default, it seems SA will honor Received-SPF headers, while I would
guess most people aren't inserting it at their MTA, so it's a great
opportunity for spammers to forge the header to say their email passed SPF.
So, shouldn't it be disabled by default, by setting
ignore_received_spf_header to
I meant to link to the relevant docs:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.3.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_SPF
On 04/21, Benny Pedersen wrote:
this header could be removed in mta, and readded if spf pass in mta, its
just not any stable milters that does it so far, but if headers is removed
Yep, I have a bunch of emails where google inserted a Received-SPF: pass
header that didn't hit SA's SPF_PASS rule. Then I started inserting that
header myself, and it hits SPF_PASS. So it is ignoring Received-SPF
headers from non-local relays. Nicely done.
(The ignore_received_spf_header
Okay, I've dug up a decent guess for all of these but doc - ham-net-bb-doc.
Anybody have an email address for him?
On 04/18, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
20110416
Missing ham-net-jm - last seen 20110401.
Missing ham-net-wt-hamtrap-en - last seen 20110129.
Missing ham-net-llanga - last seen
On 04/21, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
Isn't that MadDoc? from CREDITS:
That was my guess, thanks.
Missing ham-net-llanga - last seen 20110129.
Had forgotten about us. Re-started mass-checking.
Missing ham-net-bb-zmi - last seen 20110115.
Thought he was still mass-checking. Re-enabled,
to anybody who
does.
It's open source. You could do an unofficial release. The daily builds
have been working fine for me:
https://launchpad.net/~darxus/+archive/spamassassin-daily
What needs to happen for a release? Tarring up trunk, and testing it?
What would the version be?
--
You only truly own
On 04/28, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
What needs to happen for a release? Tarring up trunk, and testing it?
What would the version be?
There is excellent documentation of the SA release process here:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ReleasePolicy
Command lines involved, including building
On 04/28, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
I therefore propose that folks should get in whatever they can to
the 3.3.x svn branch, and whatever is there on May 4th I will cut
On 04/29, Justin Mason wrote:
+1 (from the sidelines ;)
On 04/29, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
+1. Hope you did well on your
Need voting to commit:
[review] Report for IPv6 IP hitting DNS BL/WL is broken
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6573
needs 1 vote for 3.4
[review] Use same age limits in ruleqa as in sa-updates
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6557
needs 2 votes 3.3.2
Need voting:
[review for 3.2] RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP ruleset incorrectly black flagging IP range!!!
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6552
Needs 1 vote for *3.2*. Come on. This patch was created and has been
waiting for votes since March.
Disable rfc-ignorant.org
On 05/05, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Disable rfc-ignorant.org
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6526
Needs 3 votes.
(Summary needs [review] added.)
Needs 3 votes for what? Looks like it is already committed and the
ticket is resolved because the rules were set to a score
3.3 is at least failing on the same test. To run just the failing test:
make TEST_FILES=t/originating_ip_hdr.t disttest
Looks like this test was just added for this bug:
clear_originating_ip_headers seems to be broken
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6500
Somebody want
On 05/06, Mark Martinec wrote:
Thanks, helpful!
Worked around it now in Bug 6500 / t/originating_ip_hdr.t
Cool. make test and make disttest are both passing here now.
Jenkins is quite a lot less self explanatory than it could be.
--
A ship in a port is safe, but that's not what ships are
On 04/30, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Back when Theo and I were hammering out a release a month for about
a year, we were giving one week notice that we were going to cut a
tarball to vote on.
How was that done? No branching, just do a release a month, call it a
beta, and if no problems were
On 05/07, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
While we wait, how do people feel about calling this tarball
3.3.2-rc1? Calling it rc1 may have people actually test it who
On April 30th, Daryl said There's no need to call it beta if you don't
want to. By which I believe he meant that it would be fine to
On 05/09, Henrik K wrote:
IMO if there are lots of bugs waiting on few votes or commits, I'm sure it
would be much more beneficial to check them in first.
Yes, there are a number of bugs just waiting on votes or commits, but that
was true four days ago, including a weekend, and I am very
No new rule updates are happening for trunk (in addition to Bug 6574
affecting 3.3.2).
According to my backups, the last time trunk rules got updated was
2011-05-07 or 2011-05-08 (uncertainty due to a missing backup).
Counts of sufficiently recent emails from weekly/net masscheck 1100481 from
Both of these need 1 vote from somebody other than Mark Martinec and Kevin
A. McGrail, for 3.3.2:
[review] Cannot Log to stderr without timestamps
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6418
[review] wrong status test on $sth-rows in BayesStore::PgSQL
Votes to commit since Warren proposed his 3.3.2 release, 10 days ago:
Henrik Krohns 15
Kevin A. McGrail 13
Mark Martinec 7
AXB (Alex Broens?) 1
While things like finding problems, creating the fixes and committing
them are in some ways more important, this project seems to be
On 05/10, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 10 May 2011, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
That leaves 15 people I didn't find votes from in that period who are
Committers:
John Hardin
I don't yet have sufficient familiarity with the code itself to feel
comfortable voting on most bugs. Right now I'm
Looks like the mass-check starvation problem went away:
spam ham
0 221801 2011460.524 0.000.00 (all messages)
Don't know why those numbers on ruleqa are only visible in the source.
Ah, there it is, the (source details) link.
On 05/09, John Hardin wrote:
On
On 05/11, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
Looks like the mass-check starvation problem went away:
Sorry, forgot to mention a trunk rule update also happened:
# diff -r panic-2011-05-09/var/lib/spamassassin/3.004000/
panic-2011-05-10/var/lib/spamassassin/3.004000/ | wc -l
210
As far as I know,
On 05/12, Michael Parker wrote:
# Used during the prerelease/release-candidate part of the official release
# process. If you hacked up your SA, you should add a version_tag to your
.cf
# files; this variable should not be modified.
@EXTRA_VERSION = qw();
I'm supposed to put
On 05/13, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
Although I'm not sure what it should say. What was the intent of
what is currently written there?
I'd change it to:
# Used during the prerelease/release-candidate part of the official release
# process. If you hacked up your SA, you should add a version_tag
On 05/13, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
# Used during the prerelease/release-candidate part of the official release
# process. If you hacked up your SA, you should add a version_tag to your .cf
# files; this variable should not be modified.
# Unless you're actually making an official
On 05/15, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
I think this rules tarball is utterly useless. You should use
sa-update to grab the 3.3.2 rules, generated from trunk. DOS said
something about this a few weeks ago but I can't remember where.
Why are rules tarballs still built?
--
There never has been an
is currently used by Debian and Ubuntu, to set up daily Ubuntu builds
from trunk: https://launchpad.net/~darxus/+archive/spamassassin-daily
I'd like to wipe the existing directory in trunk, and copy the current
version over from the Debian / Ubuntu package (which is a newer
version than the one I used
On 05/16, Mark Martinec wrote:
IMO the distribution-specific packaging stuff has no right to be
kept in a generic Unix/Linux/Windows package like SpamAssassin
and should be wiped out entirely. The package maintainers know
their job and their distribution most intimately and should have a
full
On 05/16, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Do we want to remove all the files and leave a README instead? In
short, should we be trying to maintain these files at all?
More immediately relevant, this is how I was going to test 3.3.2 on my
server. Installing from tarballs or cpan is too messy.
The
One hunk of a patch failed because it is now already in trunk. Easy to
fix.
But I'm really not feeling like fixing it if my work isn't going to get
into trunk.
I think having somebody (me) running daily builds of trunk on a small
production server is useful. As well as the increased ease of
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/buglist.cgi?short_desc=%5Breview;bug_status=NEW;bug_status=ASSIGNED;bug_status=REOPENED;short_desc_type=allwordssubstr
28 bugs just waiting for votes and commits. I've you have commit access,
please vote. Thorough understanding of the changes is not
So, taking [Bug 6426] and [Bug 6544] as examples, what is
a sentiment about such? Just close after the change has been
commited to trunk for some time, or should we follow a voting
procedure for each open problem report?
Documentation is here:
Area we really not even going to do another rule release to provide an
already created fix?
On 05/24, bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6552
Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com changed:
What|Removed
On 05/24, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
I consider 3.2 unmaintained and people should be running 3.3.X. I
consider a valid cross-over period to maintain both releases but
3.2.x has long since dropped off my radar.
3.3.x has only been available since 2010-01-27.
Dropping support for mission
On 05/24, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On May 24, 2011 5:47:55 PM -0400 dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
Dropping support for mission critical software after only providing 4
months to do a major upgrade is bullshit.
I'm not sure where you get 4 months from. I see over a year of time
myself,
https://launchpad.net/~spamassassin
This is just so I can grant access to the Ubuntu daily build process to
other people.
If you're a SpamAssassin committer, please tell me your username on
launchpad so I can grant you access (on this list so others have an
opportunity to dispute your
Ready to commit to 3.3.2 and trunk:
[review] 3.3.2rc1 fails t/trusted_path.t tests 69, 72, 75, 78
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6591
[review] 3.3.2rc1 fails t/spamd_sql_prefs.t tests 14
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6592
Needs 1 vote for 3.3.2,
I think there are two 3.3.2 blocker bugs with sufficient votes that
just need to be committed, and then a 3.3.2 rc2 tarball created with
the rules tarball Daryl created?
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6592
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6591
On 05/27, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
The rules as distributed by sa-update, with generated scores, are
not available in svn anywhere, right? Right now I have a copy of
Theoretically, you could run an SVN repository just for this,
Yes, but I don't think it's worth it.
correct? Can launchpad
Installed on my server (Ubuntu Lucid 10.04), no problems found so far.
Installed via:
wget
http://people.apache.org/~wtogami/devel/3.3.2-rc2/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.2-rc2.tar.bz2
http://people.apache.org/~wtogami/devel/3.3.2-rc2/Mail-SpamAssassin-rules-3.3.2-rc2.r1104058.tar.gz
[review] Make sa-learn handle an empty folder list correctly - Debian patch
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6603
Ready to commit for 3.3.2. Or close as already committed to (3.4) target.
Really minor.
[review] Add DBL spammed redirector to weekly masschecks
Still no problems on my Ubuntu Lucid (10.04) server in the 7 days I've been
running it.
On 06/06, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
We need +3 votes from PMC (or the release manager) to declare 3.3.2
an official ASF release. This 3.3.2 release has no changes since
3.3.2-rc2. Please do some testing
The 691 open SpamAssassin bugs are kind of overwhelming to tackle.
I'd like a way to tell bugzilla I've looked at this bug and decided I'm
not going to do anything with it until further notice, please never show it
to me again. And then have all searches default to not listing anything
with that
On 06/10, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
The Sought rule-set is re-generated multiple times a day, which is what
you get from the dedicated sa-update channel. With 3.3.x the plan is, to
frequently perform mass-checks and re-scoring, distributed via the
regular channel. This includes a recent
You should document this somewhere other than this list. Maybe
build/README ?
On 06/14, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
I just asked someone and the easiest, currently proposed method is:
- do *nothing* special
- just “make dist” etc. to create the spamassassin-3.3.2.tar.gz file
- then
On 06/23, bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org wrote:
--- Comment #58 from Darxus dar...@chaosreigns.com 2011-06-23 17:34:56 UTC
---
...
The wiki asking me questions I need to google every time I edit it is pissing
me off:
Who is the current President of the ASF (full name)?
ApacheCon
1 - 100 of 1624 matches
Mail list logo
