>
>
>
>
>
> From: Nicholas Chammas [via Apache Spark Developers List] [mailto:ml-node+
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ml-node%2B');>[hidden email]
> <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node=19322=0>]
> Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2016 12:42 AM
&g
rs List] [mailto:
> ml-node+ <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ml-node%2B');>[hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node=19322=0>]
> *Sent:* Saturday, October 08, 2016 12:42 AM
> *To:* Mendelson, Assaf
> *Subject:* Re: Improving volunteer management / JIRAs (split
Ah yes, on a given JIRA issue the number of watchers is often a better
indicator of community interest than votes.
But yeah, it could be any metric or formula we want, as long as it yielded
a "reasonable" bar to cross for unsolicited contributions to get committer
review--or at the very least a
I really like the idea of using jira votes (and/or watchers?) as a filter!
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Nicholas Chammas
wrote:
> I agree with Cody and others that we need some automation — or at least an
> adjusted process — to help us manage organic contributions
I agree with Cody and others that we need some automation — or at least an
adjusted process — to help us manage organic contributions better.
The objections about automated closing being potentially abrasive are
understood, but I wouldn’t accept that as a defeat for automation. Instead,
it seems
Matei asked:
> I agree about empowering people interested here to contribute, but I'm
> wondering, do you think there are technical things that people don't want to
> work on, or is it a matter of what there's been time to do?
It's a matter of mismanagement and miscommunication.
The