-Original Message-
From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 8:45 PM
To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.2.1 platforms
Tim Adams wrote:
IBM dropped support for Visual Age 6 last spring. So while
you all may
Tim Adams wrote:
IBM dropped support for Visual Age 6 last spring. So while you all may
want to support it as a best effort platform, it probably shouldn't be a
secondary platform.
Thanks for the feedback Tim. I was going to say: Sure thing! but
then I thought about it from the perspective of
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 8:45 PM
To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.2.1 platforms
Tim Adams wrote:
IBM dropped support for Visual Age 6 last spring. So while you all
may want to support it as a best effort platform, it probably
IBM dropped support for Visual Age 6 last spring. So while you all may
want to support it as a best effort platform, it probably shouldn't be a
secondary platform. I could state many reasons, but suffice it to say
that IMHO MSVC 7.1 should also be on the best effort list.
Thoughts?
-- Tim