RE: 4.2.1 platforms

2008-03-27 Thread Eric Lemings
-Original Message- From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 8:45 PM To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org Subject: Re: 4.2.1 platforms Tim Adams wrote: IBM dropped support for Visual Age 6 last spring. So while you all may

Re: 4.2.1 platforms

2008-03-26 Thread Martin Sebor
Tim Adams wrote: IBM dropped support for Visual Age 6 last spring. So while you all may want to support it as a best effort platform, it probably shouldn't be a secondary platform. Thanks for the feedback Tim. I was going to say: Sure thing! but then I thought about it from the perspective of

Re: 4.2.1 platforms

2008-03-26 Thread Tim Adams
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 8:45 PM To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org Subject: Re: 4.2.1 platforms Tim Adams wrote: IBM dropped support for Visual Age 6 last spring. So while you all may want to support it as a best effort platform, it probably

RE: 4.2.1 platforms

2008-03-21 Thread Tim Adams
IBM dropped support for Visual Age 6 last spring. So while you all may want to support it as a best effort platform, it probably shouldn't be a secondary platform. I could state many reasons, but suffice it to say that IMHO MSVC 7.1 should also be on the best effort list. Thoughts? -- Tim