On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Liviu Nicoara nikko...@hates.ms wrote:
In the meantime I would like to stress again that __rw_get_numpunct is
perfectly thread-safe and does not need extra locking for perfect
forwarding.
So, by removing the test for
if (!(_C_flags _RW::__rw_gr))
On 09/17/12 09:51, Stefan Teleman wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Liviu Nicoara nikko...@hates.ms wrote:
In the meantime I would like to stress again that __rw_get_numpunct is
perfectly thread-safe and does not need extra locking for perfect
forwarding.
So, by removing the test for
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Liviu Nicoara nikko...@hates.ms wrote:
I hope you agree that this synchronization is sufficient for the facet
initialization and reading of facet data.
Sorry, I do not agree. Two different thread analyzers from two
different compilers written by two different
On 09/17/12 11:21, Stefan Teleman wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Liviu Nicoara nikko...@hates.ms wrote:
I hope you agree that this synchronization is sufficient for the facet
initialization and reading of facet data.
Sorry, I do not agree. Two different thread analyzers from two
Liviu Nicoara nikko...@hates.ms writes:
On 09/17/12 11:21, Stefan Teleman wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Liviu Nicoara nikko...@hates.ms wrote:
I hope you agree that this synchronization is sufficient for the facet
initialization and reading of facet data.
Sorry, I do not agree.
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Wojciech Meyer wojciech.me...@arm.com wrote:
so which compilers do fail? You know, some of them might use the same
component.
Intel Compiler/Thread Analyzer on Linux, SunPro Compiler/Thread
Analyzer on Linux and Solaris (Intel and SPARC). All three of them
Hi all,
I need a reference manual for the fbe assembler. I am interested in the syntax
of the `.type' directive. Do you know where such a manual would be located? The
Solaris assembler manual I found on Oracle's website does not mention the .type
directive.
Thanks!
Liviu
