Re: [jira] [Updated] (STDCXX-1058) std::basic_ios::copyfmt() with registered callback (via std::ios_base::register_callback()) run-time SIGABRT

2012-06-13 Thread Stefan Teleman
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Martin Sebor mse...@gmail.com wrote: ... OK I attached a new test case - 27.basic_ios.copyfmt.stdcxx-1058.cpp. But, using a simple derived class from std::basic_ios doesn't trigger the bug. It's only triggered when using std::fstream or std::stringstream.

Re: [jira] [Updated] (STDCXX-1058) std::basic_ios::copyfmt() with registered callback (via std::ios_base::register_callback()) run-time SIGABRT

2012-05-31 Thread Stefan Teleman
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Martin Sebor mse...@gmail.com wrote: On 05/16/2012 09:23 PM, Stefan Teleman wrote: On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Martin Sebormse...@gmail.com  wrote: On 05/16/2012 11:55 AM, Travis Vitek wrote: I approve the change, but with one caveat. The branching

Re: [jira] [Updated] (STDCXX-1058) std::basic_ios::copyfmt() with registered callback (via std::ios_base::register_callback()) run-time SIGABRT

2012-05-17 Thread Martin Sebor
On 05/16/2012 09:23 PM, Stefan Teleman wrote: On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Martin Sebormse...@gmail.com wrote: On 05/16/2012 11:55 AM, Travis Vitek wrote: I approve the change, but with one caveat. The branching policy [1] indicates that you should commit your changes directly to the