RE: svn commit: r616003 - /stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/utilities/20.temp.buffer.cpp

2008-01-29 Thread Farid Zaripov
-Original Message- From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 5:56 PM To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r616003 - /stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/utilities/20.temp.buffer.cpp Farid Zaripov wrote: Earlier (http://www.mail

Re: svn commit: r616003 - /stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/utilities/20.temp.buffer.cpp

2008-01-29 Thread Martin Sebor
Farid Zaripov wrote: -Original Message- From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 10:26 PM To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r616003 - /stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/utilities/20.temp.buffer.cpp Should we do this in rw_new.h

RE: svn commit: r616003 - /stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/utilities/20.temp.buffer.cpp

2008-01-29 Thread Farid Zaripov
-Original Message- From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 6:27 PM To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r616003 - /stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/utilities/20.temp.buffer.cpp Farid Zaripov wrote: -Original Message- From