Since the LazyActionForm http://www.niallp.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/ can be validated
like any other ActionForm, I don't see the basis for a technical objection. In the
documentation, we would want to *strongly* recommend using the validated version, and
remind people it is a *bad* practice to pass
I vote we just roll it anyways. If we have switched to tomcat-style
releases, we can just not label it as stable. I asked one of the tomcat
guys last nite at the JakartaOne party if they close out all their bugs
and he laughed :)
Don
So, if we can solve 29285, it looks like 1.2.1 would be
I agree.
Also it seems to me that validwhen was never built to work with mapped
properties and therefore this should be an enhancement request rather than
bug. I guess the assumption is that as requiredif has been labelled as
deprecated in favour of validwhen, then validwhen should provide at
Hi Everyone,
No one is interested in having this action based
client side validation ??
I already posted two messages.
=
Regards,
-Kalpesh
(703)506-8229 X-3308 (Work)
(203)676-9385 (Mobile)
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more
Kalpesh,
Best to open a bugzilla ticket and attach your code there.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/
Niall
- Original Message -
From: kalpesh modi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 10:56 PM
Subject: action based client side validation
Hi
I would agree that both the reality and perception is that patches for enhancements
are not often applied. But, throwing bodies at the problem is not the solution. People
have to *want* to work on a project like Struts. Really, really, want it, and be
willing to work for it. Candidates have to
