svn commit: r161737 - struts/shale/trunk/core-library/src/java/org/apache/shale/view/AbstractFacesBean.java struts/shale/trunk/core-library/src/java/org/apache/shale/view/AbstractViewController.java

2005-04-18 Thread craigmcc
Author: craigmcc Date: Sun Apr 17 23:06:48 2005 New Revision: 161737 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=161737 Log: Add AbstractFacesBean as a general purpose abstract base class for application classes that want to interact with JavaServer Faces capabilities. Make

[Struts Wiki] Update of AjaxStruts by DakotaJack

2005-04-18 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change notification. The following page has been changed by DakotaJack: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/AjaxStruts -- Hope this

[Struts Wiki] Update of AjaxStruts by FrankZammetti

2005-04-18 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change notification. The following page has been changed by FrankZammetti: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/AjaxStruts -- Thanks

svn commit: r161794 - in struts/shale/trunk/use-cases/src: java/org/apache/shale/usecases/profile/ java/org/apache/shale/usecases/view/ web/WEB-INF/ web/profile/

2005-04-18 Thread craigmcc
Author: craigmcc Date: Mon Apr 18 13:15:16 2005 New Revision: 161794 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=161794 Log: Initial checkin of a version of the logon and edit profile dialogs that uses the new dialog support, instead of DialogController. This has not been tested yet (or even

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34511] New: - html:select saves itself in page scope rather than request scope

2005-04-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34511. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34511] - html:select saves itself in page scope rather than request scope

2005-04-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34511. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Ted Husted
(Moving my reply to the DEV list.) On 4/18/05, Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This was discussing my proposal for integrating AJAX functionality into the existing Struts taglibs. There were some legitimate dissenting points raised about this, and ultimately the idea was shot down.

RE: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Fogleson, Allen
Frank, Actually, I am a little confused about this. Given that I believe the quickest (which may or may not necessarily be the best) way to a solution here is to subclass the current HTML taglibs. Or alternatively create a new Ajax tagset that incorporates the HTML taglib type functionality. Yet

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21922] - TilesRequestProcessor not redirecting ForwardConfig

2005-04-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21922. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
Hahah, me state *anything* briefly?!? Have you EVER read my posts Allen?!? :) I'll try and clarify things a bit... First, on the subject of whether taglibs are the goal or not... I have on numerous ocassions said I am not a huge fan of taglibs in general. That is obviously not the popular

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
A major dumb-ass wrote: With way I had implemented the idea in the example I posted, I didn't see a good way to do anything but modify the BaseTagHandler class. I would have (as I recall thinking at the time anyway) duplicate a bunch of code, and I didn't really want to do that. Upon

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Michael J.
I was thinking of doing simple Ajax container myself, but after reading Frank's stuff, I saw broader possibilities. Let's continue in this thread, since gmail starting to slow down, trying to unfold 60+ messages ;) Javascript is needed for ajax, period. If someone turns off Javascript in attempt