[action2] Removal of AroundInterceptor and doXXX support from xwork

2006-06-18 Thread tm jee
Hi guys, Just want to confirm something. Is it correct to say that we have come to a conclusion as to remove support of AroundInterceptor and support for doXXX action method call as a fall back after xXX method is not found? If so, we should make the changes towards XWork2 (the XWork CVS

[action2] Upgrade Dojo toolkit

2006-06-18 Thread tm jee
Hi guys, Is there any plan to upgrade dojotoolkit from the current 0.2.2 to 0.3.x? 0.3.x have lots of really cool stuff and from the bugs list, it looks like lots of bugs have been fixed. Cheers.

Re: [action2] Upgrade Dojo toolkit

2006-06-18 Thread Ian Roughley
At JavaOne it was decided to go with DWR in favour of dojo. Given this I would assume that we would not upgrade the version. /Ian tm jee wrote: Hi guys, Is there any plan to upgrade dojotoolkit from the current 0.2.2 to 0.3.x? 0.3.x have lots of really cool stuff and from the bugs list,

Re: [action2] Upgrade Dojo toolkit

2006-06-18 Thread tm jee
Hmm what about the ajax component support? Are we going to make them work with dwr instead of dojo? or just dropping them rgds - Original Message From: Ian Roughley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List dev@struts.apache.org Sent: Sunday, 18 June, 2006 11:22:26 PM

Re: [action2] Upgrade Dojo toolkit

2006-06-18 Thread Martin Cooper
On 6/18/06, Ian Roughley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At JavaOne it was decided to go with DWR in favour of dojo. Given this I would assume that we would not upgrade the version. I don't believe we decided to get rid of Dojo completely, so as long as Dojo is in the mix, we should definitely

Re: [action2] Removal of AroundInterceptor and doXXX support from xwork

2006-06-18 Thread Don Brown
My only concern is WW 2.2 migrations. If it will require them to perform significant work (more than a simple rename), we should just deprecate the feature and perhaps throw a warning. Otherwise, I think we should remove it. Don tm jee wrote: Hi guys, Just want to confirm something. Is

[shale]strange behaviors in rolodex with clay use case example

2006-06-18 Thread jack . cheng
Hi, if you run the rolodex use case example (JSP view) with MyFaces 1.1.2 and later, the page will display duplicate forms after attempting to save the data that fails server-side validation. i am using the latest nightly build. Jack

Re: [Shale][PROPOSAL] Cut over to Maven2 based source tree

2006-06-18 Thread Sean Schofield
I see I am too late to add my +1. Thanks for the work Craig. I will try and test this on Monday. Sean ps. The continuum server is just sitting idly. We could start adding projects to it now if we wanted. On 6/16/06, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 -- Everything looks great. --

Re: [shale]strange behaviors in rolodex with clay use case example

2006-06-18 Thread Gary VanMatre
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, if you run the rolodex use case example (JSP view) with MyFaces 1.1.2 and later, the page will display duplicate forms after attempting to save the data that fails server-side validation. i am using the latest nightly build. This has been reported before