New portlet archetypes

2007-01-18 Thread Don Brown
I've been playing with Struts 2 and portlets lately, so I took the time to create a couple of simple portlet archetypes to make it easier to start a Struts 2 portlet. The short of it is I'm very pleased with how easy it is to create a portlet, especially when combined with the codebehind

Re: Struts 2.0 Performance

2007-01-18 Thread Ted Husted
Even though this is for WW, almost all of it is applicable to Struts 2. This is a key phrase. There are a lot of very successful WW deployments out there, with the same performance levels. We really need to setup our own benchmarks, so that we can run them with the templates deployed. I'd love

Re: Struts 2.0 Performance

2007-01-18 Thread Tom Schneider
One of the possibilities I was discussing with Phil yesterday was to implement freemarker caching on the WW side of things--just like we do with OGNL. In WW if we're not in devMode, then I think its safe to say that we can read the template once and never reread it. This would eliminate the

Re: Struts 2.0.3 status

2007-01-18 Thread Ted Husted
I updated my local copy to the revision 497046, where we added the release profile to Struts 2. When I ran from Cygwin $ mvn -P release -Dpassphrase=*** It ran fine against the core and api packages. When I tried again with $ mvn -P all,release -Dpassphrase=*** It ran fine for awhile, but

Re: Struts 2.0.3 status

2007-01-18 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 1/18/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I updated my local copy to the revision 497046, where we added the release profile to Struts 2. When I ran from Cygwin $ mvn -P release -Dpassphrase=*** It ran fine against the core and api packages. When I tried again with $ mvn -P all,release

Re: Struts 2.0 Performance

2007-01-18 Thread Bob Lee
We've been running WebWork 2 in quite a few production applications for a couple years and have seen no related performance problems. And we're very particular about performance. I wouldn't worry about it. Bob On 1/17/07, Shekhar Yadav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a plan on when the

Re: Struts 2.0 Performance

2007-01-18 Thread Bob Lee
On 1/18/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (And hopefully some of those will lend us a hand. Even with the merge, we still don't have more active committers than we had a year ago.) Sorry, Ted--I really should contribute more. I've been investing a lot of time in Guice. Bob

Re: Struts 2.0.3 status - Retag?

2007-01-18 Thread Ted Husted
I forgot that we needed to sign the Maven artificats separately before the deploy step. I haven't been able to get the other signing scripts to work, but Wendy's new release gopal does seem to be doing the job for me. Problem is, the new goal was checked in after the 2.0.3 tag. The simplest

Re: Struts 2.0.3 status - Retag?

2007-01-18 Thread Don Brown
Nope, and it would be a good thing as I fixed the portlet example and a few other minor bugs. Don Ted Husted wrote: I forgot that we needed to sign the Maven artificats separately before the deploy step. I haven't been able to get the other signing scripts to work, but Wendy's new release

Re: Struts 2.0.3 status

2007-01-18 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 1/18/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm still banging the rocks together when it comes to Maven, and I don't know what command to use to install the plugin trunk. For the record: svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/trunk/maven-gpg-plugin/ cd maven-gpg-plugin