Re: WW-1677 not working (was Re: WW-167 )

2007-11-29 Thread Ted Husted
It's true that the inner text of the JSP tag is not rendering as the inner text of the HTML tag, and so I reopened the issue. If anyone had a patch, I'd be happy to apply it. -Ted. On Nov 28, 2007 11:36 PM, Eric Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Martin, Yes, there is a problem with the

Building 2.0.11 from source (struts-2.0.11-src.zip)

2007-11-29 Thread Eric Martin
I downloaded the 2.0.11 source zip (http://download.nextag.com/apache/struts/source/struts-2.0.11-src.zip) and when I tried to build, I got the following errors: compile: [mkdir] Created dir: C:\struts-2.0.11\build\classes [javac] Compiling 416 source files to

Re: Building 2.0.11 from source (struts-2.0.11-src.zip)

2007-11-29 Thread Ted Husted
Yes, there are issues with the source distributions. I'm not sure if anyone's opened a ticket. The best approach is to check the source out from Subversion, and then run Maven. * http://struts.apache.org/dev/builds.html There are tags for all the releases, if you don't want the head for some

Re: Building 2.0.11 from source (struts-2.0.11-src.zip)

2007-11-29 Thread Eric Martin
Thanks Ted. I checked out: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/struts2/trunk And will work from that. Thanks, Eric Ted Husted wrote: Yes, there are issues with the source distributions. I'm not sure if anyone's opened a ticket. The best approach is to check the source out from

Re: WW-1677 not working (was Re: WW-167 )

2007-11-29 Thread Eric Martin
In looking into this issue, I ran into something that might part of the problem... In org.apache.struts2.components.Component, there is a method, usesBody, which always returns false and is supposed to be overridden for tags that do use a body. The problem is, for the submit tag, two of the

Re: WW-1677 not working (was Re: WW-167 )

2007-11-29 Thread Ted Husted
I cross-posted to the WW dev list, just in case. * http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=170962 On Nov 29, 2007 1:25 PM, Eric Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In looking into this issue, I ran into something that might part of the problem... In

Re: svn commit: r599476

2007-11-29 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 11/29/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: husted Date: Thu Nov 29 07:15:50 2007 New Revision: 599476 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=599476view=rev Log: WW-1399 Add simple Hello package to demonstrate basic JPA CRUD. Remove XFire test configuration for now.

Prevent unused attributes from showing up in tag name html (StrutsTagAttribute)?

2007-11-29 Thread Eric Martin
I'm playing around with creating a new button tag. There are quite a few attributes that are inherited from UIBean that I don't want to be shown in the documentation (tag name html) from the StrutsTagAttribute annotation. Is there a way to suppress or remove unwanted attributes from showing up

Re: WW-1677 not working (was Re: WW-167 )

2007-11-29 Thread Eric Martin
After pondering this for a bit, I think that the best approach would be to create a new button tag - s:button. The button tag has 3 types, button, reset, and submit. It is similar to the other FormButtons, with the exception that it has a body or nested value in the tag, unlike the input tag.

Re: Prevent unused attributes from showing up in tag name html (StrutsTagAttribute)?

2007-11-29 Thread Jeromy Evans
Eric Martin wrote: Is there a way to suppress or remove unwanted attributes from showing up for a tag? In 2.1 there's @StrutsTagSkipInheritance in core. Merging this annotation and the corresponding apt config (?) to 2.0 would be the least effort.

Re: Prevent unused attributes from showing up in tag name html (StrutsTagAttribute)?

2007-11-29 Thread Eric Martin
Jeromy Evans - Blue Sky Minds wrote: Eric Martin wrote: Is there a way to suppress or remove unwanted attributes from showing up for a tag? In 2.1 there's @StrutsTagSkipInheritance in core. Merging this annotation and the corresponding apt config (?) to 2.0 would be the least

Re: WW-1677 not working (was Re: WW-167 )

2007-11-29 Thread Ted Husted
Thanks, Eric. The next step would be to attach an initial patch to the ticket, even if it still needs tests and such. -Ted. * http://struts.apache.org/helping.html#patches On Nov 29, 2007 6:05 PM, Eric Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After pondering this for a bit, I think that the best

Re: Building 2.0.11 from source (struts-2.0.11-src.zip)

2007-11-29 Thread Antonio Petrelli
2007/11/29, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Yes, there are issues with the source distributions. I'm not sure if anyone's opened a ticket. Opened and resolved :-) https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2313 Antonio