Guys,
I was just wondering what the problems are with S2 overnight builds and why
the most recent snapshot appears to be from the end of October last year.
Al.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Just lack of people with the bandwidth to concentrate on those tasks. :(
We do have Atlassian Bamboo watching the builds for us, so we do know
whether it builds or not. The various JAR files are available there,
if you know where to look (under the target directories).
*
On Jan 14, 2008 7:25 AM, Al Sutton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just wondering what the problems are with S2 overnight builds and why
the most recent snapshot appears to be from the end of October last year.
Just to be clear, the overnight builds are the snapshots, and the
latest can be found
Thanks for the info.
I've had a look at the bamboo output and I've hit a small difference between
what it shows and what I'm seeing.
When I check our and build I a test failure with;
---
Test set:
Does the latest build need the xwork 2.1.1 snapshot or will it work with the
released 2.1.0? (fingers crossed, I'm hoping loose coupling won the day).
- Original Message -
From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List dev@struts.apache.org
Sent: Monday, January 14,
Is anyone else up to helping with the 2.1.1 release management? With
the anniversary of the first Struts 2.0 GA coming up in February, it
would be nice if we could squeeze out another tagged build.
-Ted.
-
To unsubscribe,
If we are using REST with CodeBehind/Conventions, is it true that
*any* of the application-wide properties can be set as an init-param
to the filter?
And if for some reason we needed to use different sets of
application-wide properties, we could also configure more than one
filter?
I just want
I can throw in a few hours here and there. Just let me know what you
need.
--
James Mitchell
On Jan 14, 2008, at 10:28 AM, Ted Husted wrote:
Is anyone else up to helping with the 2.1.1 release management? With
the anniversary of the first Struts 2.0 GA coming up in February, it
would be
2008/1/14, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is anyone else up to helping with the 2.1.1 release management? With
the anniversary of the first Struts 2.0 GA coming up in February, it
would be nice if we could squeeze out another tagged build.
Wait some hours, until we clear things up about
On Jan 14, 2008 8:46 AM, Al Sutton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going to look into it some more, but is it possible that bamboo is
missing something? (or that the test is showing up a platform difference
between the bamboo compile farm and my Vista/JDK 1.5.0_14 machine)?
It's working for me
I'm going to look into it some more, but is it possible that bamboo
is missing something? (or that the test is showing up a platform
difference between the bamboo compile farm and my Vista/JDK
1.5.0_14 machine)?
Yes, this is possible. Frustrating, I agree, but possible.
--
James
I've cleaned out the temporary files, put -Xmx128M in MAVEN_OPTS, and maven
reports Final Memory: 16M/42M. The box is a 3GB Q6600 so I can ramp up the
ram available to the JVM as far as neccessary.
I've been trying to see if I could hack together an Eclipse workspace to do
some tracing in to
Ditch JDK 1.4 support... problem solved ;).
Al.
- Original Message -
From: Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List dev@struts.apache.org
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 3:49 PM
Subject: Re: Struts 2.1.1 Release Planning
2008/1/14, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If I can get a build going I'll be able to spare some time :).
- Original Message -
From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List dev@struts.apache.org
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 3:28 PM
Subject: Struts 2.1.1 Release Planning
Is anyone else up to helping with the
I don't understand. Do you mean don't apply any patches for a few hours?
I didn't mean to imply that we were ready t roll 2.1.1, only that I'd
like to get ready over the next few weeks.
On Jan 14, 2008 10:49 AM, Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/1/14, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What are you talking about? How does svn favor IDEA?
I use Eclipse just fine with all of s2 (core, plugins, and apps).
Maven generates my config and everything.
--
James Mitchell
On Jan 14, 2008, at 11:20 AM, Al Sutton wrote:
I've cleaned out the temporary files, put -Xmx128M in
Just whatever is on the issues list, James.
On Jan 14, 2008 10:45 AM, Mitchell James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can throw in a few hours here and there. Just let me know what you
need.
--
James Mitchell
-
To unsubscribe,
Hi all
Fabio Gandola opened an issue about a possible XSS exploit:
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2414
See the Struts Users mailing list thread:
http://www.nabble.com/Feedback%3A-WW-2414%2C-XSS-attack-is-possible-if-using-%3Cs%3Aurl-...%3E-and-%3Cs%3Aa-...%3E-td14771449.html
Antonio
OK, I must be doing something dumb.
I took the files src/main/idea/project and src/main/idea/workspace to
indicate an idea flavour to the repository.
Have you got a magic recipie for getting a svn checkout into a workspace
with dependancies I can use?, I've tried mvn eclipse:eclipse, but I
Oh, one more thing. If you want the latest xwork in the s2 projects
that depend on it, you can checkout the trunk of xwork, gen
the .project (same as prior email instructions) and then manually add
the project to each of s2's projects. (Ya, wish it could do it for
me, but once it's done,
Works for me. It has to happen sometime.
On Jan 14, 2008 11:27 AM, Al Sutton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ditch JDK 1.4 support... problem solved ;).
Al.
- Original Message -
From: Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List dev@struts.apache.org
Sent: Monday,
Ya, try this.
cd struts2/
mvn eclipse:eclipse -Pall -DdownloadDependencies=true -
Dwtpversion=1.0
I know, I know ... wtp version is actually 1.5, but the maven plugin
supports 1.0 right now (at least the last time I checked 1.5 was
borked).
The -DdownloadDependencies is optional. What
On Jan 13, 2008 10:34 PM, matt.payne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No not backwards at all. It is exactly how inheritance works. A child is
free to override in case it wants to provide its own implementation of
something.
It's how configuration works, when there can be only one
configuration
Sir, you are a gentleman and a scholar :).
It worked like a treat (wtpversion=1.5 even worked for me).
Now I've just got to find whats causing the test failure.
Thanks,
Al.
- Original Message -
From: Mitchell James [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List dev@struts.apache.org
On Jan 12, 2008 12:24 PM, Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/1/12, Tom Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I disagree, I think there is a support cost. If users are having issues
with the 1.4 stuff, (which happens more often than not) then we're
obligated to assist that user.
I'd like to add a +1 to Ted's remarks.
The nightly builds (including j4 binaries) are done by a process that
I run from the Apache Struts zone box. I may very well be wrong, but
I was under the impression that those j4 binaries were for
convenience only and not part of the official
On Mon, January 14, 2008 1:05 pm, Ted Husted wrote:
Retrotranslation seems a pretty fast process to me.
It is fast, but the artifacts add to the clutter and confusion. The
question is whether it's gaining us active contributors. Not
freeloaders who just download the software, but volunteers
Holy crap Frank!
http://www.wantii.com/wordpress/?p=20
You were right! That was quick ;-)
-Wes
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 13:28 -0500, Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
On Mon, January 14, 2008 1:05 pm, Ted Husted wrote:
Retrotranslation seems a pretty fast process to me.
It is fast, but the
I always think of every freeloader as a free-tester.
You can be pretty sure they'll start making noises if they come accross a
bug :).
- Original Message -
From: Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List dev@struts.apache.org
Cc: Struts Developers List
A link to a Sorry, no posts matched your criteria. page always shows a
classy commentator :).
- Original Message -
From: Wes Wannemacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List dev@struts.apache.org
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 6:40 PM
Subject: Re: [S2] Libraries in JDK 1.4
Sorry, I took it down shortly after sending the message, I figured
someone would stumble across it (since there is an RSS feed) and take it
serious :(
Screenshot for your pleasure -
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2305/2193406250_160ff3c1c0_b.jpg
-Wes
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 19:16 +, Al
+1 for ditching JDK 1.4 on the Struts 2.1.x series. Struts 2.0.x
should be a reasonable transition for those still on JDK 1.4.
Tom
On Jan 14, 2008 10:37 AM, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Works for me. It has to happen sometime.
On Jan 14, 2008 11:27 AM, Al Sutton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, After the detour down the getting eclipse working I'm back on track to
see whats wrong and I'd be grateful if someone could check this over.
Whats happening at the moment is that
FreeMarkerResultTest.testWithoutWriteIfCompleted is calling through to
FreemarkerResult.execute, which in turn
Just as long as they spell my name right
Heh heh :)
--
James Mitchell
On Jan 14, 2008, at 2:46 PM, Ted Husted wrote:
OK, here it is, out of context ...
* http://www.jroller.com/TedHusted/entry/geek_glossary_asf
- Ted Just as long as they spell my name right Husted.
On Jan 14, 2008
Mac -- trying now stay tuned.
--
James Mitchell
On Jan 14, 2008, at 2:50 PM, Ted Husted wrote:
Hmmm, do you have a non-Vista machine handy?
It seems to be fine on Linux (Ubuntu?) and XPx64. Anyone try it on
a Mac today?
On Jan 14, 2008 2:32 PM, Al Sutton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 14:50 -0500, Ted Husted wrote:
Hmmm, do you have a non-Vista machine handy?
It seems to be fine on Linux (Ubuntu?) and XPx64. Anyone try it on a Mac
today?
I think you may have already covered it, but I updated from SVN and
built on Ubuntu with AMD64 using Sun Java
OK, here it is, out of context ...
* http://www.jroller.com/TedHusted/entry/geek_glossary_asf
- Ted Just as long as they spell my name right Husted.
On Jan 14, 2008 1:28 PM, Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, January 14, 2008 1:05 pm, Ted Husted wrote:
Retrotranslation
Hmmm, do you have a non-Vista machine handy?
It seems to be fine on Linux (Ubuntu?) and XPx64. Anyone try it on a Mac today?
On Jan 14, 2008 2:32 PM, Al Sutton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, After the detour down the getting eclipse working I'm back on track to
see whats wrong and I'd be
On my MacBook Pro, good to go!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/svn/struts/struts2]$ java -version
java version 1.5.0_13
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_13-
b05-241)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0_13-121, mixed mode, sharing)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've got an XP box I can duplicate this environment on. I'll give it a spin
on that and let you know tomorrow what happens (I'm on UK time and my wife's
just got home).
Al.
- Original Message -
From: Wes Wannemacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List dev@struts.apache.org
On Jan 14, 2008 11:10 AM, Tom Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for ditching JDK 1.4 on the Struts 2.1.x series. Struts 2.0.x
should be a reasonable transition for those still on JDK 1.4.
Tom
Not that my vote counts, but I'd also go +1 for ditching 1.4. I'd
also like to see lots more
2008/1/14, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I didn't mean to imply that we were ready t roll 2.1.1,
Whoops sorry! I thought exactly this!
Antonio
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
On Jan 14, 2008 10:05 AM, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's true that we're volunteers, and any of us can walk away whenever
we like, but it's also true that when we vote +1 on a GA, each voter
is saying that he or she intends to help support the release.
No, it's not. That is a myth
On Mon, January 14, 2008 5:06 pm, Martin Cooper wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 10:05 AM, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's true that we're volunteers, and any of us can walk away whenever
we like, but it's also true that when we vote +1 on a GA, each voter
is saying that he or she intends to
On Jan 14, 2008 2:33 PM, Ian Roughley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Cooper wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 10:05 AM, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's true that we're volunteers, and any of us can walk away whenever
we like, but it's also true that when we vote +1 on a GA, each
On Jan 14, 2008 2:24 PM, Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, January 14, 2008 5:06 pm, Martin Cooper wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 10:05 AM, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's true that we're volunteers, and any of us can walk away whenever
we like, but it's also true
Martin Cooper wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 10:05 AM, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's true that we're volunteers, and any of us can walk away whenever
we like, but it's also true that when we vote +1 on a GA, each voter
is saying that he or she intends to help support the release.
The ASF How it work page, at Implications of Voting, suggest that
---
In some cases and communities, the exercise of a vote carries some
responsibilities that may not be immediately obvious. For example, in
some cases a favorable vote carries the implied message 'I approve and
I'm willing to
I vote for confidence only. While I'd like to help more in 2.x, it's
impossible for me to follow through with my intention sometimes. However, I
wouldn't want a good release help up by external obligations. I would hope a
good vibrant community would bring the intention of helping automatically,
Martin Cooper wrote:
However, a +1 vote is *not* an
assertion that the voter, specifically, intends to provide such support.
Please try re-reading what I wrote. Unless, that is, you are saying that I
should be *prohibited* from voting +1 on any release unless I am
*personally* committed to
On Jan 14, 2008 9:16 PM, Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Cooper wrote:
However, a +1 vote is *not* an
assertion that the voter, specifically, intends to provide such
support.
Please try re-reading what I wrote. Unless, that is, you are saying that
I
should be
Martin Cooper wrote:
No, prohibited would probably be too strong (PROBABLY)... And yes,
I'd agree that if you know there are dozens of committers ready to
provide support, that's a bit of a different story too. But can you
really say such a discussion usually takes place before a vote? Is the
I vote +1 on a +1 indicating a willingness to support. I've lurked on this
list and other dev- lists and stayed out of voting because I couldn't
provide the support.
My question would be; If the people who voted for a release weren't willing
to support it, why should those who do provide
Are we going to bump the spring dependencies to 2.0.8 (or possibly go for
the 2.5 series) for S2.1?
Al.
P.S. (yup, still working on the test problem, just wondering if it's a
problem in spring-mock).
-
To unsubscribe,
54 matches
Mail list logo
