Re: Dojo plugin update using 1.1.0 framework

2008-04-06 Thread Al Sutton
Given the discussion, how about the following idea; - Remove the dojo plug-in from the S2 codebase and put it, in it's current state, into a googlecode project. My main driver for doing the updates was to update the S2.1 code to bring it inline with the latest version, but perhaps we should

Re: Dojo plugin update using 1.1.0 framework

2008-04-06 Thread Jeromy Evans
Martin Cooper wrote: On the other hand, creating the project in the Struts sandbox means that it is immediately open to any Struts committer, all of the resources are already set up, and getting a release out is dependent only upon a vote to move the code from the sandbox to the main code

Re: 2.1 build

2008-04-06 Thread Don Brown
FWIW, Struts Annotations 1.0.3 has been released and approved, but I haven't had time to finish it off by signing the jar and moving it to the official repo. I'll try to find some time in the next few days if no one beats me to it. Don On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 8:59 PM, Ted Husted [EMAIL

Re: 2.1 build

2008-04-06 Thread Ted Husted
Thanks, Don. BTW, getting setup for digital signing is harder than it sounds. Every committer should consider generating a signature and putting it on file with the foundation. Signing isn't hard, but it can be a stumblingblock when it comes to posting a release. *

Scope Plugin

2008-04-06 Thread Bob Tiernay
Does anyone know if there are plans to include the Scope plugin (http://cwiki.apache.org/S2PLUGINS/scope-plugin.html) in the core, and perhaps add some canned interceptor stacks that include it? I see this as missing core component that has offers a great value add to the framework and it's

Re: Dojo plugin update using 1.1.0 framework

2008-04-06 Thread Dave Newton
--- Al Sutton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My main driver for doing the updates was to update the S2.1 code to bring it inline with the latest version, but perhaps we should put our hands up and admit that S2's focus is not on Ajax UI widgets Nobody has yet provided any information as to the

Re: 2.1 build

2008-04-06 Thread Bob Tiernay
I have been waiting and waiting for the convention plugin :( That's really the only reason I've been anticipating the 2.1 release. What's involved in moving it over? -- From: Brian Pontarelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008

Re: Dojo plugin update using 1.1.0 framework

2008-04-06 Thread Al Sutton
Dave, I don't think anyone does have a good handle on how much work it would be to integrate Dojo 1.0 into the S2.1 tag framework. It's one of those things that the time taken to properly evaluate and estimate the work necessary may be longer than the time to do the work, and even when the