[S2] Adding configuration for Maven License Plugin

2008-04-18 Thread Antonio Petrelli
Hi all Since the license headers are an annoying problem, I wish to add the Maven License plugin: http://code.google.com/p/maven-license-plugin/ This plugin can *add* license headers on top of files *automatically* Thoughts? Antonio

Re: [S2] Adding configuration for Maven License Plugin

2008-04-18 Thread Giovanni Azua
hi Antonio, Using Eclipse = Preferences - Java - Code Style - Code Template - Comments - Files you can set a license header and it will be automatically applied to every new file. Better yet, you can define a Struts coding standards xml configuration that any developer can import into their

Re: [S2] Adding configuration for Maven License Plugin

2008-04-18 Thread Antonio Petrelli
2008/4/18, Giovanni Azua [EMAIL PROTECTED]: hi Antonio, Using Eclipse = Preferences - Java - Code Style - Code Template - Comments - Files you can set a license header and it will be automatically applied to every new file. In fact the problem is with *old* files :-( Better yet, you

Re: [S2] Adding configuration for Maven License Plugin

2008-04-18 Thread Giovanni Azua
Ciao Antonio, Antonio Petrelli wrote: In fact the problem is with *old* files :-( Then an alternative way would be using find/sed once and having the coding style xml config for new files. I personally find that the perfect combination is coding std xml config + jalopy + checkstyle

Re: [S2] Adding configuration for Maven License Plugin

2008-04-18 Thread Antonio Petrelli
2008/4/18, Giovanni Azua [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Ciao Antonio, Antonio Petrelli wrote: In fact the problem is with *old* files :-( Then an alternative way would be using find/sed once and having the coding style xml config for new files. It's really hard to fix 600+ files :-( I

Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available

2008-04-18 Thread Giovanni Azua
Hi Don, I am also testing the 2.1.1 here ... many thanks for pushing the build. I could not find the dojo plugin in: http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.1/struts-2.1.1-lib.zip Then I took it from:

Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available

2008-04-18 Thread Giovanni Azua
Hi Al, For me as a pure 2.x user I find the fact that 2.1.1 would be hold back only as an alpha just because of supporting a backward-compatibility S1 plugin is a huge pity to say the least :) As a Struts user I personally would expect S1 plugin to have its own release cycle away from the

Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available

2008-04-18 Thread Al Sutton
Giovanni, Like you I am a pure 2.x developer these days, and I would have absolutely no problem with the S1 plugin being spun off into a separate project, but as things are I couldn't vote for it being anything more than a test build because we are shipping something we know doesn't work with

Re: [S2] Adding configuration for Maven License Plugin

2008-04-18 Thread Jeromy Evans
Antonio Petrelli wrote: Hi all Since the license headers are an annoying problem, I wish to add the Maven License plugin: http://code.google.com/p/maven-license-plugin/ This plugin can *add* license headers on top of files *automatically* Thoughts? I may be guilty of forgetting to add the

Re: [S2] Adding configuration for Maven License Plugin

2008-04-18 Thread Antonio Petrelli
2008/4/18, Jeromy Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I may be guilty of forgetting to add the license header as I always automatically collapse them. No problem :-) If not this plugin, it would be helpful if there was an svn hook (eg. commit failed due to missing license), otherwise to have a

RE: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available

2008-04-18 Thread Fernandes, Filipe
From: Dave Newton Please post this to the struts-user list. Dave I should have been more clear... I'm not looking for support, just reporting a problem with the 2.1.1 build. The error I'm seeing is a result of using the 2.1.1 build using websphere while noting that I haven't had issues using

Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available

2008-04-18 Thread Dave Newton
--- Al Sutton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As I see it this would be like Apple making and releasing a new Speaker System today that wouldn't work with the iPod touch, or Microsoft releasing a new version of Office which isn't compatible with Vista, It'd be more like an iPod speaker system that

Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available

2008-04-18 Thread matt.payne
My build is getting xwork 2.0.4. This should pull xwork 2.1.x right? --2008-04-18 10:51:15.033::WARN: failed action2-cleanup java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com/opensymphony/xwork2/util/logging/LoggerFacto ry at org.apache.struts2.dispatcher.ActionContextCleanUp.clinit(ActionCon

Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available

2008-04-18 Thread matt.payne
Disregard that post. Sorry. Matt matt.payne wrote: My build is getting xwork 2.0.4. This should pull xwork 2.1.x right? --2008-04-18 10:51:15.033::WARN: failed action2-cleanup java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com/opensymphony/xwork2/util/logging/LoggerFacto ry at

Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available

2008-04-18 Thread Al Sutton
Dave, The problem is that the S1 plugin does work with older versions of S1, just not the most recent one, so it's more like if you have a video playing iPod, and it's not the most recent one, then you're OK. My problem is really that the whole point of the S1 plugin is to allow S1 code to

Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available

2008-04-18 Thread Al Sutton
Make that the most recent version that is over a year old (I was looking at the 1.3.9 beta release date), so we've been telling S1 users to go with 1.3.9 for over a year, but we're now saying Well if you did do it then you're stuffed if you want to use the most recent S2 as well.. not a

Re: [S2] Adding configuration for Maven License Plugin

2008-04-18 Thread Antonio Petrelli
2008/4/18, Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi all Since the license headers are an annoying problem, I wish to add the Maven License plugin: http://code.google.com/p/maven-license-plugin/ This plugin can *add* license headers on top of files *automatically* Sorry, I changed my

Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available

2008-04-18 Thread Jeromy Evans
Don Brown wrote: The test build of Struts 2.1.1 is available. Release notes: * http://struts.apache.org/2.0.11.1/docs/version-notes-211.html Any idea why this published Version 6 of the release notes dated 19 Feb 08 instead of Version 11 that was current at 17 Apr 08? Note the incorrect

Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available

2008-04-18 Thread Don Brown
Whoops, that should be: http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-211.html Don On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Jeromy Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Don Brown wrote: The test build of Struts 2.1.1 is available. Release notes: *