RE: Google App Engine support?

2009-04-10 Thread Al Sutton
Great. Nice work!!! Unfortunately most of my apps use sitemesh, so there's still some things for me to sort out before I can make full use of GAE :(. Al. --- * Written an Android App? - List it at http://andappstore.com/ * == Funky Android Limited is registered in England Wales with the

Ready for Struts 2.2 and XWork 2.2?

2009-04-10 Thread Don Brown
Now that 2.1 is GA (thanks guys and gals), are we ready to branch it off and move trunk to 2.2? I was wanting to do some refactoring of how XWork configuration is loaded and parsed, but new classes and the like really isn't appropriate for a patch/micro release. Any objections to the branching?

Re: Ready for Struts 2.2 and XWork 2.2?

2009-04-10 Thread Musachy Barroso
I think we are good. What changes do you have in mind?, the OSGi plugin could take advantage of some refactoring of xwork so I am interested :) musachy On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 8:24 AM, Don Brown mr...@twdata.org wrote: Now that 2.1 is GA (thanks guys and gals), are we ready to branch it off

Re: Google App Engine support?

2009-04-10 Thread Musachy Barroso
having a property for that makes sense. I will take a look over the weekend and see if I can figure out how to make sitemesh work. musachy On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Don Brown mr...@twdata.org wrote: Huzzah, it works.  Once I removed sitemesh, the simple starter app works:

Re: Ready for Struts 2.2 and XWork 2.2?

2009-04-10 Thread Don Brown
Off the top of my head: * Split out the XML parser from XmlConfigurationProvider so that you can parse XML from any source * Get rid of all the Class.forName() calls in XWork I'd rather not do this on a stable branch, particularly since new public classes will be created. How many changes are

Re: Google App Engine support?

2009-04-10 Thread Brian Pontarelli
Interesting. On the Guice list there is another thread about GAE. You should submit a bug for Sitemesh to Google and to the Sitemesh maintainers. Google seems to be up for fixing some of these issues. This one looks like either a JNDI bug or JNDI security measure (my guess is the later).

Re: Ready for Struts 2.2 and XWork 2.2?

2009-04-10 Thread Musachy Barroso
2.1.7 has bug fixes and some small changes in Convention, nothing big. musachy On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Don Brown mr...@twdata.org wrote: Off the top of my head: * Split out the XML parser from XmlConfigurationProvider so that you can parse XML from any source * Get rid of all the

Re: Ready for Struts 2.2 and XWork 2.2?

2009-04-10 Thread Musachy Barroso
I forgot to say, we can roll a build without trouble, we just need to release xwork first (I don't think there is any blocker for xwork). musachy On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Musachy Barroso musa...@gmail.com wrote: 2.1.7 has bug fixes and some small changes in Convention, nothing big.