Re: Seeking reflections on our tag library (as a framework)

2009-08-12 Thread Antonio Petrelli
2009/8/11 Musachy Barroso musa...@gmail.com: Like Eric said, one of the things that I dislike about the current tags is the inheritance of the attributes. Out tags for the tld generation have ways to hack around that problem, but it still smells. I don't know how it is OT, but maybe it might

Create a single javascript

2009-08-12 Thread Johannes Geppert
Hello, maybe anybody can give my some input for an idea I have today. I work on the current struts2-jquery-plugin. http://code.google.com/p/struts2-jquery/ At the moment the tags create after each generated html tag an separate script tag like this: div id=mydiv1/div script

struts-master and struts-annotations

2009-08-12 Thread Wes Wannemacher
There have been a few small changes to both struts-master and struts-annotations... The change to struts-master will hopefully keep someone (me) from stomping on the http://struts.apache.org site when releasing it in the future. Unfortunately, the only way to test it is to do a release (at least

Re: Create a single javascript

2009-08-12 Thread Johannes Geppert
Hello Eric, thank you for fast response. Obinna wrote: What I have done is to put all of the meat of the javascript code into a single file which is included in the sj:head and then just have a small binding snippet code rendered with each tag which calls a binding function in the main

Re: struts-master and struts-annotations

2009-08-12 Thread Musachy Barroso
The change to struts-annotations was trivial and long over due, so there should be no problems. Build away. musachy On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Wes Wannemacherw...@wantii.com wrote: There have been a few small changes to both struts-master and struts-annotations... The change to

Re: Create a single javascript

2009-08-12 Thread Musachy Barroso
2.) This big javascript was loaded on every single page This is an advantage instead of a problem. Browsers can cache this javascript file, if you put all the javascript in the page, it will: 1. make your pages bigger (not good) 2. prevent the browser from caching the javascript (longer

Re: Create a single javascript

2009-08-12 Thread Chris Pratt
Since it's a finite set of cases, you might be able to use jQuery's awesome ability to gather information together and meet both requirements with very little work. If you assign non-visual classes to the inputs then use a single script tag at the end of the document to bind all the inputs to

Re: Create a single javascript

2009-08-12 Thread Obinna
2009/8/12 Johannes Geppert jo...@web.de Hello Eric, thank you for fast response. Obinna wrote: What I have done is to put all of the meat of the javascript code into a single file which is included in the sj:head and then just have a small binding snippet code rendered with each

Struts Annotations 1.0.5 Release Vote

2009-08-12 Thread Wes Wannemacher
The Struts Annotations 1.0.5 test build is now available as a Maven artifact. Functionality was added, but Struts releases do not currently use the new features. The test build is available in the Struts snapshot repository located here -

Re: Struts Annotations 1.0.5 Release Vote

2009-08-12 Thread Musachy Barroso
+1 GA On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Wes Wannemacherw...@wantii.com wrote: The Struts Annotations 1.0.5 test build is now available as a Maven artifact. Functionality was added, but Struts releases do not currently use the new features. The test build is available in the Struts snapshot

Re: Struts Annotations 1.0.5 Release Vote

2009-08-12 Thread Wes Wannemacher
Here is my +1 GA, binding -W On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Wes Wannemacherw...@wantii.com wrote: The Struts Annotations 1.0.5 test build is now available as a Maven artifact. Functionality was added, but Struts releases do not currently use the new features. The test build is available

Re: Struts Annotations 1.0.5 Release Vote

2009-08-12 Thread Rene Gielen
+1 GA Wes Wannemacher schrieb: The Struts Annotations 1.0.5 test build is now available as a Maven artifact. Functionality was added, but Struts releases do not currently use the new features. The test build is available in the Struts snapshot repository located here -

Re: Let's kill xwork (was Re: 2.1.8 release?)

2009-08-12 Thread Paul Benedict
I definitely agree that Struts 3 would be a good candidate to do this XWork migration. It is not an appropriate candidate for 2.1, or 2.2. However, if you like to do a 2.5 (I dislike superficial jumps in versions though), then it might be acceptable in the 2.x branch. Paul On Tue, Aug 11, 2009

Re: Let's kill xwork (was Re: 2.1.8 release?)

2009-08-12 Thread Wendy Smoak
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Paul Benedictpbened...@apache.org wrote: I definitely agree that Struts 3 would be a good candidate to do this XWork migration. It is not an appropriate candidate for 2.1, or 2.2. However, if you like to do a 2.5 (I dislike superficial jumps in versions though),

Re: Struts Annotations 1.0.5 Release Vote

2009-08-12 Thread Rainer Hermanns
+1 GA Cheers, Rainer Von meinem iPhone gesendet Am 12.08.2009 um 19:29 schrieb Wes Wannemacher w...@wantii.com: The Struts Annotations 1.0.5 test build is now available as a Maven artifact. Functionality was added, but Struts releases do not currently use the new features. The test build

Re: Let's kill xwork (was Re: 2.1.8 release?)

2009-08-12 Thread Brian Pontarelli
Except the API changes. Remember that any API change that breaks someone should be a major release. That's why people work so hard on keeping old APIs around. Sent from my iPhone On Aug 12, 2009, at 3:45 PM, Wendy Smoak wsm...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Paul