RE: Build requires JDK 1.6 now - EmbeddedJSP plugin

2009-08-24 Thread Al Sutton
My opinion is to go J6 with a J5 optional package. That way users can get as much as we can give them out of the box and if they really must only use J5 they can still do so. We'll also have to make sure we don't use String.isEmpty :). Al. -- * Written an Android App? - List it at

Re: Convention/XWork on GAE: unable to get members (SecurityException)

2009-08-24 Thread Jeromy Evans
On 24/08/2009, at 1:29 PM, Jeromy Evans wrote: As a work-around (guess), I changed it to cimpl.getDeclaredClasses() instead which is permitted (I don't know if this has the same effect on the ClassLoader). That got me past the issue above, but the same SecurityException occurs in

Re: Convention/XWork on GAE: unable to get members (SecurityException)

2009-08-24 Thread Philip Luppens
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Jeromy Evansjeromy.ev...@blueskyminds.com.au wrote: On 24/08/2009, at 1:29 PM, Jeromy Evans wrote: As a work-around (guess), I changed it to cimpl.getDeclaredClasses() instead which is permitted (I don't know if this has the same effect on the ClassLoader).

Re: Struts2 validation

2009-08-24 Thread Arthur Neves
Tks Chris, however I'm asking here because I'd like to know if there are some way to make validations like in the JSF. Making validation directly in JSP. If there isn't a similar way in Struts2, It will be cool to create! Because in struts1, I've already had some problems with validation.xml, like

Re: Build requires JDK 1.6 now - EmbeddedJSP plugin

2009-08-24 Thread Paul Benedict
Isn't only the build requiring JDK 6? It's not that JDK 6 is required at run-time. If that's the case, I don't think this is a big deal. On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 1:07 AM, Al Sutton a...@funkyandroid.com wrote: My opinion is to go J6 with a J5 optional package. That way users can get as much as

RE: Build requires JDK 1.6 now - EmbeddedJSP plugin

2009-08-24 Thread Al Sutton
I guess that depends on whether; The EmbeddedJSP plugin's JSPLoader uses javax.tools.JavaCompiler that is Since 1.6 only means used during the compile or used during runtime. Al. -- * Written an Android App? - List it at http://andappstore.com/ * == Funky Android Limited is registered

Edit Wiki is not possible

2009-08-24 Thread Johannes Geppert
Hi, I just released a new Beta Version of the jQuery Plugin, and would like to edit the Wiki Page. http://cwiki.apache.org/S2PLUGINS/jquery-plugin-easy-ajax-and-widget-integration.html But when I go to Edit Page I become an Not Permitted message. Why this? The last times it works fine. Best

Re: Edit Wiki is not possible

2009-08-24 Thread Dave Newton
Wes Wannemacher wrote: As a side note, we probably don't need a CLA on file for users to be able to edit the plugins space on the wiki, do we? Is it exported with the distro? Dave - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Edit Wiki is not possible

2009-08-24 Thread Wes Wannemacher
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Johannes Geppertjo...@web.de wrote: Hi, I just released a new Beta Version of the jQuery Plugin, and would like to edit the Wiki Page. http://cwiki.apache.org/S2PLUGINS/jquery-plugin-easy-ajax-and-widget-integration.html But when I go to Edit Page I

Re: Edit Wiki is not possible

2009-08-24 Thread Johannes Geppert
Hello Wes, ok, so can someone please add me too the right group when it is possible. Yes I send my CLA to Martin and the Apache Secretary a while ago. But I don't receive any confirmation. Johannes Wes Wannemacher wrote: This might be a bit of a problem, we had a wiki-er who registered

Re: Struts2 validation

2009-08-24 Thread Chris Pratt
Yes, the workflow interceptor handles programmatic validation. Unless you are talking about client side validation (since you mention the JSP), then I would suggest looking at jQuery Validate. (*Chris*) On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 5:19 AM, Arthur Neves arthu...@gmail.com wrote: Tks Chris,

Re: Struts2 validation

2009-08-24 Thread Brian Pontarelli
Actually, I think this is in regards to the JSF validation attributes yo can specify on the JSF tags. I believe that this either does some serialization magic or some session magic to connect the attributes specified on the tags with the server-side validator. I think it looks like:

Re: Build requires JDK 1.6 now - EmbeddedJSP plugin

2009-08-24 Thread Chris Pratt
Yes, for the EmbeddedJSP plugin, it would require Java6+, but the rest of Struts 2 (everything we have today) would work fine with Java 5. So I can't really see a need for separate J5 and J6 releases. Noting that that single plugin requires Java6 seems sufficient to me. (*Chris*) On Mon, Aug

Re: Build requires JDK 1.6 now - EmbeddedJSP plugin

2009-08-24 Thread Paul Benedict
If JDK6 is required to run, then I think two things should be done: * A profile be created to build this plugin * The maven-enforcer-plugin should enforce the use of at least JDK 1.6 Paul On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Chris Pratt thechrispr...@gmail.comwrote: Yes, for the EmbeddedJSP

Re: Edit Wiki is not possible

2009-08-24 Thread Martin Cooper
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Wes Wannemacherw...@wantii.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Johannes Geppertjo...@web.de wrote: Hi, I just released a new Beta Version of the jQuery Plugin, and would like to edit the Wiki Page.

Re: Convention/XWork on GAE: unable to get members (SecurityException)

2009-08-24 Thread Musachy Barroso
would it help to have a maven archetype for S2 and GAE? musachy On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 1:41 AM, Philip Luppensphilip.lupp...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Jeromy Evansjeromy.ev...@blueskyminds.com.au wrote: On 24/08/2009, at 1:29 PM, Jeromy Evans wrote: As a

Re: Edit Wiki is not possible

2009-08-24 Thread Johannes Geppert
thank you Martin, now it works. I thought that the WIKI Space for plugins is for everyone who released struts2 plugins. Johannes Martin Cooper-2 wrote: Johannes, I could have sworn that I ACKed receipt of your iCLA to someone, but I can't find a record it that, so my apologies. In any

2.1.8?

2009-08-24 Thread Andreas Joseph Krogh
I know I'm nagging... Now how about that 2.1.8-GA? Any issues left to be resolved or are we waiting for the xwork-2.1.6 again? -- Andreas Joseph Krogh andr...@officenet.no Senior Software Developer / CTO +-+ OfficeNet AS

Re: Edit Wiki is not possible

2009-08-24 Thread Musachy Barroso
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Martin Coopermart...@apache.org wrote: I understand the infra position, but if we now require that anyone who wants to edit the non-official spaces needs to ask for permission, and be added to a group, before they can start, that's going to be a pain for us to

Re: 2.1.8?

2009-08-24 Thread Musachy Barroso
yup. when xwork is released, and if nobody messed anything up (/rolls_eyes), then we can build 2.1.8. @Wes, are you going to take care of 2.1.8? musachy On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Andreas Joseph Kroghandr...@officenet.no wrote: I know I'm nagging... Now how about that 2.1.8-GA? Any

Re: Build requires JDK 1.6 now - EmbeddedJSP plugin

2009-08-24 Thread Musachy Barroso
Everything should be included in the default build. We can add a profile to exclude the plugin from building, just like we did with assembly. musachy On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Paul Benedictpbened...@apache.org wrote: If JDK6 is required to run, then I think two things should be done: *

Re: 2.1.8?

2009-08-24 Thread Wes Wannemacher
I can do it, no problem, except people.apache.org is still down, so I wouldn't expect any movement until infra gets that figured out. http://monitoring.apache.org/status/ In addition to xwork 2.1.6, I'd also like to get struts-master released so that we aren't sitting on changes up there as

Re: Struts2 validation

2009-08-24 Thread Arthur Neves
Chris, you're right, I've already looked at jQuery Validate, and my suggestion is implementing a new plug-in that include some validation(JS validation) tags, using the JQuery Validate API. We can make the client validations, without XML, it's more simple, and the client validations are at the

Re: Struts2 validation

2009-08-24 Thread Chris Pratt
There's a team currently developing a jQuery plugin. Maybe this is a candidate for inclusion. (*Chris*) On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Arthur Neves arthu...@gmail.com wrote: Chris, you're right, I've already looked at jQuery Validate, and my suggestion is implementing a new plug-in that

Please read and let me know if I need to add anything

2009-08-24 Thread Wes Wannemacher
Guys, is the following sufficient for a release announcement for struts-annotations - Subject: [ANN] Struts Annotations 1.0.5 Release The Apache Struts group is pleased to announce that Struts Annotations 1.0.5 is available as a GA release. The GA designation is our highest quality grade. The

Re: Please read and let me know if I need to add anything

2009-08-24 Thread Musachy Barroso
I think we have a template in the release docs. (looks like that anyway) musachy On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Wes Wannemacherw...@wantii.com wrote: Guys, is the following sufficient for a release announcement for struts-annotations - Subject: [ANN] Struts Annotations 1.0.5 Release The

Re: 2.1.8?

2009-08-24 Thread Andreas Joseph Krogh
On Monday 24 August 2009 07:34:57 pm Wes Wannemacher wrote: I can do it, no problem, except people.apache.org is still down, so I wouldn't expect any movement until infra gets that figured out. http://monitoring.apache.org/status/ It's up now... In addition to xwork 2.1.6, I'd also like to

Re: Please read and let me know if I need to add anything

2009-08-24 Thread Wes Wannemacher
I tried to retrofit the template, but the release template is written for a whole-ball-of-wax release, so I wanted to make sure it sounds okay... -Wes On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Musachy Barrosomusa...@gmail.com wrote: I think we have a template in the release docs. (looks like that