On 30/01/2009, at 11:47 AM, Wes Wannemacher wrote:
On Thursday 29 January 2009 19:08:59 Brett Porter wrote:
Hi folks,
This issues was raised with infrastructure last year as Bamboo
couldn't post to comm...@struts. With the changes to use Hudson, is
it
still needed, or are you able to post
issues from another source).
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
br...@apache.org
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
--
Brett Porter
br...@apache.org
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
...
Apache already has two of them running (Continuum, at
vmbuild.apache.org, and Hudson, at hudson.zones.apache.org) that you
can simply request access to.
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett Porter
br...@apache.org
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter
... but you probably don't want the default, and should specify your own. :)
I think the defaults in this version are more sensible than last time,
where they were blatantly incorrect. But they probably still require
some customisation.
- Brett
On 05/09/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-manifest.html
On 05/09/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/4/06, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... but you probably don't want the default, and should specify your own. :)
I think the defaults in this version are more sensible than
From those that have been using it, I've heard retrotranslator was
more workable for this scenario. We have plugins for both retroweaver
and retrotranslator at mojo.codehaus.org:
http://mojo.codehaus.org/retrotranslator-maven-plugin/
Jason Dillon has been working on making that more functional
On 07/07/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't seen it on a non-Windows system, but that's because I'm on
WinXP + Cygwin. :)
http://www.vmware.com/products/server/ :)
BTW, I just sanity checked that there wasn't a toLower or anything in
there, but I'm still not prepared to rule
(from the peanut gallery)
How about:
repos/asf/struts/branches/struts-1.3/...
repos/asf/struts/trunk (2.0, 2.1, 3.0 goes here)
It's not like you're the first project here to have had a 1.3 v 2.0 issue :)
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x/
Cheers,
Brett
On 30/06/06,
On 06/06/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maven2 needs to support integration testing as a first class notion in the
architecture of what you envision a project to be.
It may not have been clear enough, but that's exactly what I meant in
my last email. I thought this is what the
It depends :)
I'm happy to hand out access to it. There are a couple of gotchas though.
1) there's only 20G of disk space in total, so we'll need to be
proactive on keeping that in check
2) Continuum doesn't have a lot of features for manging multiple
groups of people in one instance (all the
It'll probably get closed as a duplicate, but thanks for the input.
It *should* still be possible to achieve what you want currently (I
thought Vincent's chapter discussed that, but I don't might be
mistaken). It may take some effort, though, and I'm not sure of any
existing examples. The
Martin was the one that knew the steps - I've not done anything with
the wikidiffs myself. :)
Cheers,
Brett
On 5/2/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/1/06, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/1/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/30/06, Brett Porter
My bad - fixed. Sorry for the inconvenience.
I have also subscribed all committers to the 'allow' list for commits
to save the moderators some time.
Cheers,
Brett
On 5/1/06, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Same here.
--
James Mitchell
On Apr 30, 2006, at 12:45 PM, Wendy Smoak
On 4/27/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, 'notifications@' is something I'd like to see for Continuum.
:) With that addition, we'd have the same setup that Maven does:
http://maven.apache.org/mail-lists.html
For the record, I think this is working great for us. One of the
to any different steps in between.
Cheers,
Brett
On 4/27/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does the end workflow look like? Do you just add a transition to
resolve to the close step?
Don
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
I've noticed that there have been 1 or 2 mails recently on this list
are the apis with the other javadoc going to be in a separate module?
This should make it easy to produce javadoc from there, and then go on
to produce the aggregated javadoc for the others.
- Brett
On 4/16/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/15/06, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
17 matches
Mail list logo
