Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.4 Quality

2006-05-13 Thread Martin Cooper
be irresponsible for the Struts team to release 1.3.4 as GA. -- Martin Cooper I think we should adjust any documentation to only mention the 1.1 DTD, and perhaps add the 1.3 DTD information as an errata. Don - To unsubscribe, e

Re: Struts JIRA -- top level 'ALL' and/or 'SITE' project?

2006-05-13 Thread Martin Cooper
be elsewhere. -- Martin Cooper -- Wendy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.4 Quality

2006-05-13 Thread Martin Cooper
. -- Martin Cooper

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.4 Quality

2006-05-13 Thread Martin Cooper
way of finding out. Do we need a new version (1.3.5) just for this? Unfortunately, yes. It's the only reliable way. -- Martin Cooper I am okay either which way. -- Paul --- Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/10/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Once you have had

Re: [action2] Public API first draft

2006-05-04 Thread Martin Cooper
On 5/4/06, Claus Ibsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The JDK1.5 api looks really great. I'm not native english but is this interface name correct? Validatable Should it not be? Validateable Neither of these is an English word... ;-) -- Martin Cooper /Claus

Re: JIRA links to Subversion commits

2006-05-04 Thread Martin Cooper
On 5/3/06, Jeff Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 08:00:43PM -0700, Martin Cooper wrote: On 5/3/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Subversion plugin for JIRA seems to be installed, but it's not working. Weird. It seems to be working _sometimes_

Re: SAF 1.3.x and legacy RequestProcessor

2006-05-04 Thread Martin Cooper
(arbitrary properties on all config objects is a nice one) and I doubt there's any interest at all in that backporting. I would be OK with deprecating RequestProcessor. Me too. -- Martin Cooper I've been concerned about people using older subclasses of RequestProcessor (like for SSLExt or even Tiles

Re: [VOTE] Accept and Graduate WebWork 2 Podling to Struts

2006-05-04 Thread Martin Cooper
On 4/30/06, Ian Roughley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Martin Cooper wrote: On 4/28/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I call a vote that the Struts PMC accept the WebWork 2 podling as having met the incubation requirements and thereby be accepted by the Apache Struts project as Struts

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality

2006-05-03 Thread Martin Cooper
!) -- Martin Cooper We welcome votes from all community members, however, only the votes of Struts PMC members are binding. My vote is for Beta quality, as there are no unreleased dependencies, all the key example apps work correctly, and I've personally had the 1.3.x code in production for over six

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality

2006-05-03 Thread Martin Cooper
there are some minor issues, but the code works, the examples work, and you could start using it in a development environment without problems. That is exactly my definition of beta as well. -- Martin Cooper Don Ted Husted wrote: +1 Alpha As Don mentioned, some of the documenation

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality

2006-05-03 Thread Martin Cooper
candidate. Our Test Build is always a release candidate, in effect, because since we don't vote until after it's built, there is always a possibility that it could become GA. (Not counting the cases where we know up front that it's not good enough, of course.) -- Martin Cooper The JIRA issues aside, I

Re: JIRA links to Subversion commits

2006-05-03 Thread Martin Cooper
don't have access to the properties file (that I know of). An infra ticket, perhaps? -- Martin Cooper For example: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=398085view=rev http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-2852?page=all This page says there is a properties file to edit, and I wonder

Re: [VOTE] Release the struts-parent pom v2

2006-05-03 Thread Martin Cooper
, for example: roles roleCommitter/role rolePMC Member/role /roles rather than replacing 'Committer' with 'PMC Member'? Just a thought - no big deal. -- Martin Cooper This is the parent pom from which struts-action-parent inherits, and it needs to be released

Re: [VOTE] Accept and Graduate WebWork 2 Podling to Struts

2006-05-01 Thread Martin Cooper
On 5/1/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Martin Cooper wrote: On 4/28/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I call a vote that the Struts PMC accept the WebWork 2 podling as having met the incubation requirements and thereby be accepted by the Apache Struts project as Struts Action 2

Re: .NET/WebServices/Java

2006-05-01 Thread Martin Cooper
On 5/1/06, Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, so I'll bite... What's Girders? Why, it's the stuff that Irn-Bru is made from, of course! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irn_Bru -- Martin Cooper - Posted via Jive

Re: [PROPOSAL] Separate lists for notifications vs. discussion

2006-05-01 Thread Martin Cooper
. -- Martin Cooper I'll update mail.xml with the new list descriptions tonight. Thanks, Wendy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PROPOSAL] Separate lists for notifications vs. discussion

2006-04-29 Thread Martin Cooper
cause some confusion when they're not. ;-) And I admit I'm just as guilty of this as anyone else. -- Martin Cooper I'll go ahead and ask infrastructure to establish the new [EMAIL PROTECTED] list with archives, and to make sure that commits@ will be archived before we unsub it from [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [action1] Improving our tests -- long [was Re: Standalone Tiles: Status and Call for Help]

2006-04-29 Thread Martin Cooper
. I'd appreciate it if someone could fix that, because right now, there are development discussions going on that are not visible to everyone on this list, which is not good. -- Martin Cooper several ideas were mentioned, and so I thought I'd throw it out there for comment. Patrick has

Re: [VOTE] Accept and Graduate WebWork 2 Podling to Struts

2006-04-29 Thread Martin Cooper
to sort these out first. I'm willing to help do that if someone can verify what needs to happen. -- Martin Cooper Status: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/webwork2.html [ ] +1 Let's bring it in, and I'm committed to the project [ ] +0 Let's bring it in, but I won't be involved [ ] -0 I'd rather

Re: Suggestion: Google Calendar for Struts

2006-04-28 Thread Martin Cooper
of the ASF repository. FYI, I just separated this out into its own file, rather than lumping it in where it was. -- Martin Cooper -Ted. On 4/29/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/28/06, Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So who's account do we want to create

Re: Linking SVN to JIRA

2006-04-27 Thread Martin Cooper
. -- Martin Cooper If it is, then all you have to do is reference the JIRA ticket in the SVN log. The only trick is to be sure the JIRA reference is a standalone string, and not punctuated or formatted. Bad * [STR-1234] Good * STR-1234 Or even something like * Resolved STR-1234

Re: Proposal for change

2006-04-25 Thread Martin Cooper
, forever? Perhaps a few would, but many would not. They would more likely keep quiet, the end result being that Mr. Pile O'Crap becomes a committer because the only people who voted were the ones in favour. IMHO, that is A Very Bad Thing. -- Martin Cooper The latter statement is, as mentioned in my

Re: Proposal for change

2006-04-25 Thread Martin Cooper
in how the project develops. There! You've said it. That exactly describes the purpose of the dev@ list. So, now, why again do we need the three lists you mention above? ;-) -- Martin Cooper

Re: Proposal for change

2006-04-25 Thread Martin Cooper
interest in how the project develops. So you actually agree with the Apache Way. ;-) -- Martin Cooper Simply putting code out there and sharing your work is great, but going back to a point I made some weeks ago, I beleive there is a responsibility that comes along with it when you do that. Whether

Re: [PROPOSAL] Separate lists for notifications vs. discussion

2006-04-25 Thread Martin Cooper
importantly, PMC members - to opt out of seeing what goes on throughout the project, which is definitely A Bad Idea (TM) in my opinion. -- Martin Cooper Thanks, -- Wendy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

Re: Proposal for change

2006-04-25 Thread Martin Cooper
in Greg Reddin's history I provided a URL which demonstrates that that statement is incorrect. -- Martin Cooper that is really what trolling is all about. There are clearly more than I found by doing a general search for Redding. Try doing one for Frank and see what happens, Martin. I really

Re: Bug report for Struts [2006/04/23]

2006-04-24 Thread Martin Cooper
on infra@ would know how to enable it. ;-) -- Martin Cooper Don Ted Husted wrote: On 4/23/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Heh, guess we'll need to turn that off :) I should already know this, but does JIRA have an automatic email report that we can turn on? -Ted

Re: [action2] Action Next++ (Ti Phase 2)

2006-04-24 Thread Martin Cooper
that. +1 -- Martin Cooper Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even if you can burn it out, it can be fixed. Try something new. -- Robert Moog

Re: Standalone Tiles as TLP

2006-04-24 Thread Martin Cooper
On 4/24/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/23/06, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/23/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Agreed. Would it be possible to do this by JavaOne? Moving Tiles isn't a huge deal, but it would make the new directions of Struts

Re: Standalone Tiles as TLP

2006-04-23 Thread Martin Cooper
the ground, because it would sidestep all the Commons navel-gazing that has effectively blocked its creation so far. I know Hen is on this list. Hen, any thoughts here before I propose this on [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Martin Cooper Don Ted Husted wrote: On 4/22/06, Martin Cooper [EMAIL

Re: Standalone Tiles as TLP

2006-04-23 Thread Martin Cooper
of Struts. Any perception - real or otherwise - that Tiles is tied to Struts will be detrimental to Tiles as an independent library. -- Martin Cooper Don Wendy Smoak wrote: On 4/23/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Agreed. Would it be possible to do this by JavaOne? Moving Tiles

Re: Standalone Tiles as TLP

2006-04-23 Thread Martin Cooper
Components'. -- Martin Cooper Don Frank W. Zammetti wrote: Doesn't that conflict with the idea of making Tiles a stand-alone TLP? Frank Don Brown wrote: I'm fine with this solution, as long as my original concern of a circular dependency is resolved. Don Wendy Smoak wrote: On 4

Re: Standalone Tiles as TLP

2006-04-23 Thread Martin Cooper
On 4/23/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/23/06, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1) Get Standalone Tiles really standalone, so that there are no dependencies on other Struts code. Maybe that's happened already - I've kinda lost track. This seems to be done -- sandbox

Re: Standalone Tiles as TLP

2006-04-22 Thread Martin Cooper
(nee Jakarta Silk) gets off the ground, and then move there, where it can share a general purpose web-focussed community and mindshare. -- Martin Cooper Greg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands

Re: Standalone Tiles as TLP

2006-04-22 Thread Martin Cooper
agree with. :-) But I don't think a TLP is the right place. -- Martin Cooper -Ted. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Standalone Tiles as TLP

2006-04-22 Thread Martin Cooper
into the wild. -- Martin Cooper There are a few other technologies I want to spend time looking at once we get a release of Tiles. I'd like to see how it compares to Facelets, Clay, and Sitemesh, as well as how much relevance Tiles has in a portlet environment. Those things may help

Re: svn commit: r396020 - /struts/current/STATUS.txt

2006-04-21 Thread Martin Cooper
are not actually PMC members until 72 hours after a board ack. That ack is only a couple of hours old. ;-) -- Martin Cooper , post April Status report, and update roster of recent votes, Modified: struts/current/STATUS.txt Modified: struts/current/STATUS.txt URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs

Re: Struts BOF at JavaOne?

2006-04-21 Thread Martin Cooper
bar/restaurant somewhere near by. Any ideas? I don't have any suggestions on the logistics, but my employer, Wyant Data Systems (www.wyantdata.com), has offered an initial $200 for beer. Each? ;-) (Well, it *is* Friday!) -- Martin Cooper Now the 'good' part is dependent on which

Re: [action2] Switching to Dojo widgets

2006-04-13 Thread Martin Cooper
, however as for 0.2.1 it is still seems a little buggy. /Ian Martin Cooper wrote: On 4/12/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm starting to look into replacing the LGPL Javascript components with ones provided by Dojo, a toolkit we are already using. Dojo already has

Re: JS Libraries (was Re: [WebWork2] TODO)

2006-04-13 Thread Martin Cooper
On 4/12/06, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (Yeah, I'm very late catching up...) On 3/28/06, Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had very bad experiences with Dojo so far, and I brought this into discussion on ww forums. I wouldn't encourage moving to Dojo, because

Re: svn commit: r393500 - in /struts/site: ./ legacy/ legacy/struts-doc-1.0.2/ legacy/struts-doc-1.1/ src/ src/site/ src/site/fml/ src/site/resources/ src/site/resources/images/ src/site/resources/pro

2006-04-12 Thread Martin Cooper
for the parts. See: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/action/trunk/core/src/site/fml/faqs/kickstart.fml https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/action/trunk/core/src/site/fml/faqs/newbie.fml I can fix those this evening if nobody beats me to it. -- Martin Cooper , and I fixed the ones

Re: svn commit: r393544 - in /struts/site/src/site/fml: helping.fml kickstart.fml roadmap.fml

2006-04-12 Thread Martin Cooper
commenting them out. I can fix that this evening if nobody beats me to it. -- Martin Cooper Modified: struts/site/src/site/fml/helping.fml struts/site/src/site/fml/kickstart.fml struts/site/src/site/fml/roadmap.fml Modified: struts/site/src/site/fml/helping.fml URL: http

Re: Maven 2 build working, more to come

2006-04-12 Thread Martin Cooper
.) I'd like to move the src/conf and conf/java files into src/main/resources and remove the resource tags from the pom, also. +1 -- Martin Cooper This page should capture everything a developer needs to know to work with the build, so please add to it as you discover things, or even add

Re: svn commit: r393500 - in /struts/site: ./ legacy/ legacy/struts-doc-1.0.2/ legacy/struts-doc-1.1/ src/ src/site/ src/site/fml/ src/site/resources/ src/site/resources/images/ src/site/resources/pro

2006-04-12 Thread Martin Cooper
On 4/12/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Martin Cooper wrote: Um, no, I don't think so. Both files are missing ids for the parts. See: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/action/trunk/core/src/site/fml/faqs/kickstart.fml https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/action/trunk

Re: [action2] Switching to Dojo widgets

2006-04-12 Thread Martin Cooper
instructions on how to construct a custom profile (which is really easy). I'm certainly willing to help out here. -- Martin Cooper Don - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: JS Libraries (was Re: [WebWork2] TODO)

2006-04-12 Thread Martin Cooper
they were designed to be used, viz _without_ an abstraction layer on top of the browser. -- Martin Cooper Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even if you can burn it out, it can be fixed. Try

Re: JS Libraries (was Re: [WebWork2] TODO)

2006-04-12 Thread Martin Cooper
everything Dojo has. I can understand why you would not want to load all of that for just a calendar. But you don't have to. That is the beauty of the Dojo profile system. -- Martin Cooper And I agree, this is my case too. I would prefere something small and working almost everywhere. We have even

Re: JS Libraries (was Re: [WebWork2] TODO)

2006-04-12 Thread Martin Cooper
considered Prototype too heavy (around 50K) to adopt for my project... Prototype's heaviness is in its feet - it will quite happily stomp all over any other JavaScript code you have on the page. It's really a very badly behaved chunk of code. -- Martin Cooper Michael

Re: JS Libraries (was Re: [WebWork2] TODO)

2006-04-12 Thread Martin Cooper
don't have interoperability. -- Martin Cooper The question really is do we bundle the libaries and the implementations with the SAF 2.0 release or should there be a seperate project where the different library integrations live? Althought we could extract them into a optional project, I

Re: JIRA

2006-04-11 Thread Martin Cooper
apparently some problems yesterday, but it seems to be working right now. In general, you'd need to ping [EMAIL PROTECTED] for updates on the issue tracking systems. -- Martin Cooper ./alex -- .w( the_mindstorm )p

Re: [VOTE] Release the struts-parent pom v1

2006-04-09 Thread Martin Cooper
/volunteers.html I'm +1 when the missing committers are added. -- Martin Cooper Here's my +1. -- Wendy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: svn commit: r392870 - /struts/action/trunk/apps/mailreader/src/main/resources/

2006-04-09 Thread Martin Cooper
. Hmm, is this a temporary thing? Maven 2 likes to find resources under 'resources', rather than in the source tree (meaning that's the default). That happens to be my preference too. ;-) -- Martin Cooper Removed: struts/action/trunk/apps/mailreader/src/main/resources

Re: [Action2] Replacing the OpenSymphony copyright

2006-04-04 Thread Martin Cooper
not require transfer of copyright, just a grant of copyright license. -- Martin Cooper While I don't mind doing the grunt work, I had a question: is there a policy on the use of the $Id line as the first line in the license? Does it require any subversion configuration for it to be replaced

Re: [Action2] Replacing the OpenSymphony copyright

2006-04-04 Thread Martin Cooper
, I'd guess that as long as their Steering Committee (i.e. Patrick and Hani) are OK with it, then we're fine. -- Martin Cooper Don Martin Cooper wrote: On 4/3/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Patrick's code grant came in, so we can now replace the copyright on all the OpenSymphony

Re: [Proposal] Merge Struts Scripting into Struts Extras

2006-04-04 Thread Martin Cooper
a release already, we'll want to keep some semblance of normalcy to the version numbering, which will be easier if it has its own version number. Frankly, if we move it from its own sub-project to being a component of Action 1, I doubt that many people would even notice. -- Martin Cooper PS - I

Re: [Proposal] Flattening the sandbox

2006-04-04 Thread Martin Cooper
; if it wants shelves, that's equally simple, as is none of the above. -- Martin Cooper Don - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Proposal] Dissolve the Struts Flow subproject

2006-03-30 Thread Martin Cooper
have led the way on this type of change, so it's not unheard of. And perhaps by the time someone has the energy to pick it up again, we'll have a more favourable ruling on using NPL libraries too. ;-) -- Martin Cooper Don

Re: SV: Struts 1.3 and Internationalization

2006-03-29 Thread Martin Cooper
to the user in an error situation. Once you bring other data types into the picture, you can no longer guarantee that you can redisplay exactly what the user (mis-)typed. -- Martin Cooper What I'm saying is that your form should have String values and RequestUtils.populate() will populate

Re: JIRA instance

2006-03-29 Thread Martin Cooper
to say that JIRA is ready to go. If so, where is it? :) Gone? ;-) -- Martin Cooper -Ted. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: SV: Struts 1.3 and Internationalization

2006-03-29 Thread Martin Cooper
them in order to support a comma decimal separator Perhaps, but doesn't that make this a BeanUtils question rather than a Struts question? If you're doing the conversion from strings using BeanUtils yourself, I guess I'm not sure what the relationship is to Struts and i18n. -- Martin Cooper from

Re: SV: Struts 1.3 and Internationalization

2006-03-29 Thread Martin Cooper
not be able to correctly re-present the values the user entered when they were entered incorrectly. For that, you _must_ use strings. -- Martin Cooper Hermod -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin Cooper Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 7:46 AM

Re: WebWork and LGPL dependencies

2006-03-28 Thread Martin Cooper
him to this discussion? Yes, they are. There are several mailing list archive sites, and you can also see mail to this list on gmane or nabble. For example: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.struts.devel/37916 -- Martin Cooper cheers, ./alex -- .w( the_mindstorm )p. On 3/28/06

Re: New Bugzilla version: 1.0.2

2006-03-28 Thread Martin Cooper
because Struts 1.0.2 went GA. We also have version numbers that include Beta and RC. How do we want to handle this? I think having both 1.0.2 Final and 1.0.2 Alpha would be confusing to users, to say the least... Suggestions, anyone? -- Martin Cooper Thanks, Wendy

Re: WebWork and LGPL dependencies

2006-03-27 Thread Martin Cooper
)? Has anyone yet talked to the JasperReports guy? If we want to do that, I'm willing to talk to them. I know the CTO of JasperSoft and some other people there, although not the JasperReports guy specifically. Let me know. -- Martin Cooper This would be a dependency really hard to replace

Re: WebWork renaming strategy *revised*

2006-03-26 Thread Martin Cooper
logic indeed. What you just said is the number of people who favour #2 is about the same as the number of people who favour #1, which leaves us with option #1. Now, I don't know about you, but that's not the way the logic I know behaves... ;-) -- Martin Cooper This is off-topic, but, speaking

Re: html taglib autocomplete

2006-03-26 Thread Martin Cooper
. Of course, if you can't find a committer willing to apply this for you, _you_ could be the one to provide the extension I mentioned above. ;-) -- Martin Cooper Mark On 3/24/06, Mark Lowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/24/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With maven 1 you run

Re: html taglib autocomplete

2006-03-26 Thread Martin Cooper
. And, to be honest, who would use such a mechanism for standard attributes when they're already supported by the tags? ;-) -- Martin Cooper Paul --- Mark Lowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just went to submit the a patch, and did a search for autocomplete before I added a new bug and fund 5 or so

Re: Struts 1.3.1 - When?

2006-03-26 Thread Martin Cooper
will not. Certainly there will be lots of excitement and activity around SAF2, but few, if any, of us have the luxury of dropping everything and working on the latest cool stuff. If nothing else, our day jobs will ensure that we stay involved with earlier versions. -- Martin Cooper

Re: WebWork renaming strategy *revised*

2006-03-25 Thread Martin Cooper
. as the configuration properties prefix - struts. - ww: tag prefix - a: That works for me. Or af or saf instead of ti. I'm not a fan of having version numbers in package names, though. -- Martin Cooper Since Ti is the code name for Action 2 and there is significant precident within Apache

Re: WebWork and LGPL dependencies

2006-03-25 Thread Martin Cooper
need to make them optional, not bundle them, and not have explicit ties to them. -- Martin Cooper tia, Rainer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Action 2 commit messages

2006-03-24 Thread Martin Cooper
I've checked in the change to the SVN mailer. I'm not sure if there's anything else I need to do, but I'll ask. -- Martin Cooper On 3/24/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can the commit messages for the code in the incubator be directed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of dev@ directly

Re: svn commit: r38833, et seq

2006-03-24 Thread Martin Cooper
On 3/24/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Don't we want these going to [EMAIL PROTECTED] rather than dev@ (but with the reply to set to dev@, as it now is)? Yup. See my reply to Wendy's message on the same topic. -- Martin Cooper -Ted. -- Forwarded message -- From

Re: Maven 2 repository containing Action 1.3?

2006-03-23 Thread Martin Cooper
be org.apache.struts.tiles, org.apache.struts.taglibs groupIds with only one artifact per groupId. No, it doesn't. As I described above, the 'action' is not the Java package but the framework. -- Martin Cooper Wendy Smoak a écrit : On 3/22/06, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: Maven 2 repository containing Action 1.3?

2006-03-23 Thread Martin Cooper
: groupIdorg.apache/groupId artifactIdstruts/artifactId what would I get? My expectation is that I'd get an error. ;-) -- Martin Cooper On 3/23/06, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/22/06, Nicolas De Loof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why use org.apache.struts.action

Re: New Bugzilla Version for 1.2.9

2006-03-22 Thread Martin Cooper
Done. -- Martin Cooper On 3/22/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could someone with appropriate karma please create a new Bugzilla version for 1.2.9? tia Niall - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Maven 2 repository containing Action 1.3?

2006-03-22 Thread Martin Cooper
as well as the groupId. Not sure I understand this. If I wanted to create a local or remote repo that satisfied the above dependency (assuming it's correct), what do I need to do? -- Martin Cooper -- Wendy - To unsubscribe

Re: [VOTE] Struts Shale v1.0.1 Quality

2006-03-21 Thread Martin Cooper
heard the official word from Martin yet but I might be able to help out if not this release, the next one. Huh? Wha? Martin me? What word are you waiting for from me? -- Martin Cooper Gary A few other things: - I noticed (too late for 1.0.1) that there's a broken link on the release

Re: Struts Action Servlet loading problem

2006-03-21 Thread Martin Cooper
list. -- Martin Cooper On 3/21/06, niranjan maturi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I wrote a simple struts application and when I try to deploy in weblogic 8.1, it gives the following error: Servlet class org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet for servlet ActionServlet could not be handled

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.9 Quality

2006-03-19 Thread Martin Cooper
than optimal time for testing a new build (read: crunch time). I expect to have feedback tomorrow. -- Martin Cooper --- Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This version has received the following votes to date: Don Brown voted for GA quality (binding) Frank Zammetti voted for GA

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.9 Quality

2006-03-17 Thread Martin Cooper
back, then you have a screw loose. ;-p -- Martin Cooper /devils advocate speech -Ted. Leon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bylaws and Releases

2006-03-09 Thread Martin Cooper
bugs weren't found until a wider audience was exposed to it. I do agree that we should make sure people understand that it's not a release, but I don't think we need to assume that the user@ audience is too dumb to recognise the distinction between a Test Build and a Release. -- Martin Cooper

Re: Bylaws and Releases

2006-03-09 Thread Martin Cooper
On 3/9/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/9/06, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I do agree that we should make sure people understand that it's not a release, but I don't think we need to assume that the user@ audience is too dumb to recognise the distinction between

Re: Cactus tests via Maven

2006-03-09 Thread Martin Cooper
should be using the old multipart handler anyway, so there's no point in testing it. -- Martin Cooper Niall - Original Message - From: Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 1:10 AM When I run the Cactus tests through Maven against Tomcat 4.1.31, I get three

Re: turning off workflow logs

2006-03-08 Thread Martin Cooper
On 3/8/06, Cindy Bishop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I looked all over that site and couldn't find out how... Then you might want to follow the advice on that site and ask on the appropriate list. ;-) http://www.livinglogic.de/Struts/contributors.html -- Martin Cooper -Original Message

Re: Bylaws and Releases

2006-03-06 Thread Martin Cooper
there are unwritten rules. Our current system is effectively build first, vote later, because we don't classify the test build as a release - it's just that, a Test Build. So, basically, go for it, Wendy. :-) And thanks! -- Martin Cooper [1] http://struts.apache.org/bylaws.html Thanks, -- Wendy

Re: [shale] Wiki pages / organisation

2006-03-05 Thread Martin Cooper
a / in the page name? How about Shale/Articles? The '/' is just a character in the page name, but always using leading caps makes for consistent page names when we might have parent or child page names that are themselves wiki words (e.g. WebWork/Migration). -- Martin Cooper Niall FWIW

Re: SOURCEFORGE.NET UPDATE - 2006-02-24 EDITION

2006-02-25 Thread Martin Cooper
it. :-) -- Martin Cooper thanx leon On 2/25/06, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Some interesting news from sf.net. They now offer SVN...cool! -- James Mitchell EdgeTech, Inc. http://edgetechservices.net/ 678.910.8017 Skype: jmitchtx Begin forwarded message: snip

Re: SOURCEFORGE.NET UPDATE - 2006-02-24 EDITION

2006-02-25 Thread Martin Cooper
on the SVN mailing lists, if you care to discuss how SVN could meet your needs. -- Martin Cooper We make releases of the prod system twice a month, 95% of them aren't head releases. What we do is to assign a Tag to each project. There are two projects always existing: bugfixes+tasks

Re: Reasons for 1.3 release

2006-02-20 Thread Martin Cooper
some time in the mailing list archives. Virtually all of the points you've been bringing up recently were discussed to death on the list several months ago, so you'll find lots of explanatory material in there. -- Martin Cooper And this goes back to the heart of my problem with Struts 1.3 vs

Re: Reasons for 1.3 release

2006-02-19 Thread Martin Cooper
that what we already have with: action path=/MyAction catalog=MyCatalog command=MyCommand/ or am I misunderstanding? -- Martin Cooper Michael. Craig

Re: Reasons for 1.3 release

2006-02-19 Thread Martin Cooper
this would be very nice. This is what I meant when I said earlier (in this thread) that I don't have any Action classes in my 1.3 app. I don't need 'em any more, even just to invoke a chain. -- Martin Cooper Frank Martin Cooper wrote: On 2/19/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip

Re: Tag / Branch naming (was Re: svn commit: r378516 - /struts/action/tags/STRUTS-ACTION_1.3.0/)

2006-02-18 Thread Martin Cooper
On 2/18/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2/17/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2/17/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2/17/06, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can't we all just use what we were using for the first 5 years of Struts

Re: svn commit: r378516 - /struts/action/tags/STRUTS-ACTION_1.3.0/

2006-02-17 Thread Martin Cooper
Why are we changing the convention for tag naming now? We have always used underscores in the tag names, ever since the STRUTS_0_5 tag way back when. I don't see any reason to change that now. -- Martin Cooper On 2/17/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: husted Date: Fri

Tag / Branch naming (was Re: svn commit: r378516 - /struts/action/tags/STRUTS-ACTION_1.3.0/)

2006-02-17 Thread Martin Cooper
to use for any given tag or branch without having to go look in the 'tags' or 'branches' directory in SVN first. Can't we all just use what we were using for the first 5 years of Struts? -- Martin Cooper On 2/17/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2/17/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [VOTE] Confirm the Struts Action Library 1.3.0 release plan

2006-02-17 Thread Martin Cooper
or branch in SVN. That so many things can be done without anything on your local disk is one of my favourite things about SVN. IMO, such a tag is going to be the only reliable way to connect the version number to its precise content. -- Martin Cooper Of course, if that sounds like fun to someone else

Re: [VOTE] Confirm the Struts Action Library 1.3.0 release plan

2006-02-17 Thread Martin Cooper
On 2/17/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2/17/06, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is the Struts Action Library what the Struts Classic release page on the wiki is about? If not, I'm now quite confused about what Struts Action Framework, Struts Action Library and Struts

Re: [VOTE] Confirm the Struts Action Library 1.3.0 release plan

2006-02-16 Thread Martin Cooper
feel like taking the extra time to fix. As for 1.1, personally, I _do_ see 1.2 as making 1.1 obsolete, so I don't see a need to update that as well. And I would expect 1.3 to make 1.2obsolete in time, too. -- Martin Cooper As to any other changes, if Wendy doesn't mind, and someone wants

Re: [VOTE] Confirm the Struts Action Library 1.3.0 release plan

2006-02-16 Thread Martin Cooper
On 2/16/06, Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, February 16, 2006 12:34 pm, Martin Cooper said: As for 1.1, personally, I _do_ see 1.2 as making 1.1 obsolete, so I don't see a need to update that as well. And I would expect 1.3 to make 1.2obsolete in time, too. I don't

Re: Reasons for 1.3 release

2006-02-16 Thread Martin Cooper
as WebWork morphs into Struts 2. Maybe they're ready to make the leap to WebWork now, and go with the flow as it morphs. Or maybe they're more comfortable sticking with what they know for now - the Struts 1 line - until Struts 2 solidifies. To each his own. -- Martin Cooper

Re: Reasons for 1.3 release

2006-02-16 Thread Martin Cooper
On 2/16/06, Michael Jouravlev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2/16/06, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Amongst other things, 1.3 brings a clean way of implementing your action mappings as chains of commands instead of using actions. That alone makes it stand out from 1.2. I like

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >