Re: Removal of my name from the Emeritus volunteers list

Antonio, we are sorry to hear this, since this page entry first and foremost represents you personal, unexpirable merit in contributing to the growth and maintenance of a software project quite a few people found and still find useful. We respect your decision and wish you all the best. If your

[ANN] [SECURITY] Announcing CVE-2019-0230 (Possible RCE) and CVE-2019-0233 (DoS) security issues

Two new Struts Security Bulletins have been issued for Struts 2 by the Apache Struts Security Team: [1] S2-059 - Forced double OGNL evaluation, when evaluated on raw user input in tag attributes, may lead to remote code execution (CVE-2019-0230) [2] S2-060 - Access permission override causing a

Re: [VOTE] Struts Maven Archetypes 2.5.22

+1 GA, binding Thanks Lukasz! - René Am 02.07.20 um 07:31 schrieb Lukasz Lenart: > Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond > with a vote on its quality: > > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ ] General Availability (GA) > -- René Gielen

Re: Site build job re-activated

Hey Lukasz, there is still no publication of the latest site master. Looking into the ticket, you said things work now, but ...?!? Thanks & regards, René Am 13.04.20 um 09:02 schrieb Lukasz Lenart: > pon., 13 kwi 2020 o 08:45 Rene Gielen napisał(a): >> >> Thanks Luka

Re: OSGi Support

This is more a question for the users list, isn't it? - René Am 09.04.20 um 08:15 schrieb Lukasz Lenart: > śr., 8 kwi 2020 o 22:44 Martin Gainty napisał(a): >> >> .Hi Lukasz >> >> /2.3.24.1/bundles>grep -S -l "bundle<" *.* >> >> ./admin/pom.xml >> ./demo/pom.xml > > Yes, I know that we have

Re: Releases and distribution

Hi Justin, Am 13.04.20 um 08:23 schrieb Justin Mclean: > Hi, > >> Both artifacts however are technical upstream artifacts for framework >> releases and it does not make any sense for them to be used outside of >> this context, say by end users upgrading their stack. > > Well ASF policy states

Re: Site build job re-activated

Thanks Lukasz! As I also mentioned in my comment, it does not look like direct pushes to master get picked up for the production site. Do you have an idea? - René [1] https://github.com/apache/struts-site/pull/144#discussion_r407337579 Am 11.04.20 um 19:08 schrieb Lukasz Lenart: > Hi, > > I

Re: Releases and distribution

Hi Justin, good catch - it was overseen. Both artifacts however are technical upstream artifacts for framework releases and it does not make any sense for them to be used outside of this context, say by end users upgrading their stack. Does it make sense to list them in the report regardless?

Site build job re-activated

Hey folks, was there a specific reason the Struts site build job was de-activated? https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/Struts/job/Struts-site/ I re-activated it, so if this increases the probability for world destruction please let me know :) - René -- René Gielen

[ANN] Launch of the 2020 ASF Community Survey

On behalf the ASF Diversity & Inclusion Committee: Hello everyone, If you have an apache.org email, you should have received an email with an invitation to take the 2020 ASF Community Survey. Please take 15 minutes to complete it. If you do not have an apache.org email address or you didn’t

Travel Assistance for ApacheCon NA Las Vegas 2019 now open.

Extending on behalf of the Apache Travel Committee. --- The Travel Assistance Committee (TAC) are pleased to announce that travel assistance applications for ApacheCon NA 2019 are now open! We will be supporting ApacheCon NA Las Vegas, Nevada on 9th - 12th September 2019  TAC exists to help

Re: [VOTE] Struts Master 13

+1 GA (binding) Am 27.09.18 um 08:48 schrieb Lukasz Lenart: > The Struts Master 13 test build is now available as a Maven artifact. > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/struts/struts-master/13/ > > Release notes: > * uses a proper profile to prepare a release,

Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.5.17

+1 GA (binding) Am 20.08.18 um 07:31 schrieb Yasser Zamani: > The Apache Struts 2.5.17 test build is now available. In addition to critical > overall proactive security improvements, it includes the latest security > patch > which fixes one possible vulnerability: > - Possible Remote Code

[VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.35

+1 GA (binding) @Yasser: Great work, thanks a lot! Please keep in mind that your vote also counts. You have casted a vote, yet not voted yourself. Please consider doing so since we need at least 3 binding +1! Am 20.08.18 um 07:30 schrieb Yasser Zamani: > The Apache Struts 2.3.35 test build is

REMINDER - TAC Applications closes in 2 weeks for ACNA Montréal

Reminder that travel assistance applications for ApacheCon NA 2018 are still open but only for another*2 weeks*! Please get your applications in NOW. We will be supporting ApacheCon NA Montréal, Canada on 24th - 29th September 2018  TAC exists to help those that would like to attend ApacheCon

Re: [VOTE] Struts Master 11

+1 GA (binding) Am 18.08.17 um 10:12 schrieb Lukasz Lenart: > The Struts Master 11 test build is now available as a Maven artifact. > > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/struts/struts-master/11/ > > Release notes: > * uses the latest Apache Parent POM version 18

Re: S2 makes Hacker News :/

More of that... http://www.reuters.com/article/us-canada-cyber-idUSKBN16K2BC Am 09.03.17 um 16:04 schrieb Lukasz Lenart: > 2017-03-09 15:45 GMT+01:00 Dave Newton : >>

Re: How to select how to solve issue?

Am 13.02.17 um 12:10 schrieb Lukasz Lenart: > 2017-02-04 19:19 GMT+01:00 Yasser Zamani : >> 2. When I fixed WW-4694, I discovered that our AnnotationUtils has not >> any tangible improvement for about 4 years and also, with my changes, a >> method named isAnnotatedBy will

Re: Upgrading do Servlet API 2.5 and JSP API 2.1

Am 23.11.16 um 12:56 schrieb Lukasz Lenart: > I prefer to go in small steps: > > - Struts 2.6 - Servlets 2.5, JSP 2.1, Java 7 > - Struts 3 - Servlets 3.0, JSP 2.2, Java 7 > - Struts 4 - ..., Java 8 > > and as from Struts 3 switch to full Semantic Versioning http://semver.org/ +1 to all these

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.3.30

+1 GA (binding) Am 12.07.16 um 07:37 schrieb Lukasz Lenart: > The Apache Struts 2.3.30 test build is now available. With this release: > > [WW-4641] - CVE-2016-0785 > [WW-4642] - Unable to retrieve s:hidden field values > [WW-4645] - SecurityMemberAccess exclude class design issue > [WW-4651] -

Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.24.3

+1 GA, binding Am 20.04.16 um 15:19 schrieb Lukasz Lenart: > The Struts 2.3.24.3 test build is now available. It includes the > latest security patch which fixes three possible vulnerabilities: > - Forced double OGNL evaluation, when evaluated on raw user input in > tag attributes, may lead to

Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.20.3

+1 GA, binding Am 20.04.16 um 13:51 schrieb Lukasz Lenart: > The Struts 2.3.20.3 test build is now available. It includes the > latest security patch which fixes three possible vulnerabilities: > - Forced double OGNL evaluation, when evaluated on raw user input in > tag attributes, may lead to

Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.28.1

+1 GA, binding Am 20.04.16 um 08:42 schrieb Lukasz Lenart: > The Struts 2.3.28.1 test build is now available. It includes the > latest security patch which fixes two possible vulnerabilities: > - Possible RCE vulnerability in XSLTResult > - Prevents execution of chained expressions based on new

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.3.27

+1 GA (binding) - René Am 18.03.16 um 10:01 schrieb Lukasz Lenart: > This is a third call in row with tiny fix discovered during test > period so I'm going to speed things up as there are three security > bulletins addressed with this release. > > The Apache Struts 2.3.26 test build is now

Re: Struts 2.3.25

This is good news! Am 04.03.16 um 08:27 schrieb Lukasz Lenart: > Hi, > > Struts 2.3.25 is almost here just 5 issues left but those aren't huge > problems. > >

Re: SMI on steroids Feature Request

Greg is a Struts committer and as such completely free to implement and commit on features or bugs, with or without PR. Given that, I think Greg is pretty well aware how things are run. Just in case this needs clarification, I'll put this straight with my "manager" (aka PMC member) hat on: What

Re: Official Docker images

Would be a nice addition, indeed. I think an image with Tomcat+war would be a good way to go for people to try the showcases. Maven image + checkout from git + building would be of interest for core developers only, not sure wether one would want to go down this route. - René Am 08.02.16 um

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.5 BETA3

[ ] Leave at test build [ ] Alpha [x] Beta [ ] General Availability (GA) Great job! Am 21.01.16 um 14:56 schrieb Lukasz Lenart: > The Apache Struts 2.5 BETA3 test build is now available. > > New in BETA1 > - XWork source was merged into Struts Core source, it means that there > be no more

Re: From Confluence to Markdown

Hi Lukasz, sorry for seeing this post a little bit late - too much mails all around, I guess :) I've made some progress on this as time permits, but still a lot to be done. I'm convinced that moving to MarkDown / AsciiDoctor would be a HUGE improvement both for our docs in general as well as our

Re: unsubscribe me

Please follow the instructions found here: http://struts.apache.org/mail.html Am 06.01.16 um 19:17 schrieb john feng: > unsubscribe > -- René Gielen http://twitter.com/rgielen - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Official Docker images

This is really a great improvement for having a portable and easy to setup publishing platform, indeed. Related: I made some experiments with JBake lately http://jbake.org/ The claim "Jekyll of the JVM" pins it down quite well. It requires just a JDK and integrates perfectly with maven builds.

Re: Starting work on 2.5

:46 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org: 2015-05-22 13:40 GMT+02:00 Rene Gielen gie...@it-neering.net: While it is OK for me to drop GitFlow, I'm -1 for moving core development to GitHub. We should not rely on an external service for our internal workflow. GitHub should remain

Re: Starting work on 2.5

While it is OK for me to drop GitFlow, I'm -1 for moving core development to GitHub. We should not rely on an external service for our internal workflow. GitHub should remain the interface for external contributors, but not the place where the committership driven development should take place.

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.3.24

Just to make it clear: as of today, Christoph's vote is technically binding by all means :) @Christoph: later today you'll get a mail with further information - René Am 11.05.15 um 15:03 schrieb Christoph Nenning: 2015-05-10 8:32 GMT+02:00 i...@flyingfischer.ch i...@flyingfischer.ch: +1

Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.20.1

+1 GA binding Thanks Łukasz! - René Am 06.05.15 um 09:28 schrieb Lukasz Lenart: The Struts 2.3.20.1 test build is now available. It includes the latest security patch which fixes one possible vulnerabilities: - Wrong excludeParams overrides those defined in DefaultExcludedPatternsChecker

Re: [ANN] Apache Struts 2.3.20 GA release available with security fix

Can't believe this is a minor release Great job, thank Lukasz! - René Am 08.12.14 16:37, schrieb Lukasz Lenart: The Apache Struts group is pleased to announce that Apache Struts 2.3.20 is available as a General Availability release. The GA designation is our highest quality grade. Apache

Re: Struts 2.3.20 ready for test

Hi Markus, to help collect the vote and for enabling consistent future reference to the voting process thread it would be great if you could reply to Łukasz' [VOTE] mail. Sorry for for being a bit pedantic, and thanks for voting :) Regards, René Am 01.12.14 18:23, schrieb

Re: @required attribute

We kind of broke it already. Currently it looks broken in either way to me. I think we should try for the best possible fix that has clear semantics and an easy-enough migration path. I'd also suggest to discuss this further in the mentioned JIRA ticket to have a straight issue history. - René

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.3.18

To add some additional context, anyone is invited to vote. The more votes we get, binding or not, the more confident we can be about the release quality. On the other hand, if we get -1 from any of the voters, we carefully have to check what the reasons were and if GA release makes sense then.

Re: Fwd: Announcing the new Powered By Apache logo

Looks great! Am 27.10.2014 14:28 schrieb Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org: 2014-10-08 7:35 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org: Done, please check - we have one more version then normally as jpg version doesn't allow transparent background :-) She complained a bit for that

Re: Fwd: Announcing the new Powered By Apache logo

This would be great, yes. Am 02.10.14 14:31, schrieb Lukasz Lenart: Should we prepare the same Powered by... logo? -- Forwarded message -- From: Sally Khudairi s...@apache.org Date: 2014-10-01 18:32 GMT+02:00 Subject: Announcing the new Powered By Apache logo To: ASF

Re: New logo

her ;-) 2014-03-19 16:32 GMT+01:00 Rene Gielen gie...@it-neering.net: By sudden I realized I forgot to comment so far - shame on me! Logo image idea / execution: fabulous Color scheme: 3rd ++, 2nd + Font: Yet undecided. My gut fav is 2nd, but I also agree with Lukasz that Aleo (1st

Re: New logo

: https://copy.com/Ly91R3KAkPCm https://copy.com/9gghodFkEJmr About CamelCase - hm... good question, I also like that - will ask her ;-) 2014-03-19 16:32 GMT+01:00 Rene Gielen gie...@it-neering.net: By sudden I realized I forgot to comment so far - shame on me! Logo image idea / execution

Re: [jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] MVC 1.0 JSR

Reference: https://java.net/projects/jax-rs-spec/lists/users/archive/2014-08/message/16 It was tried to make this a part if next JAX-RS spec, but wit this message it is clear that it will be covered by a new JSR apart from JAX-RS See also the attached PDF in the posting. - René Am 19.08.14

Re: Do we still sign releases?

Correct, unsigned releases won't make it to central. On 24. Juni 2014 07:06:46 MESZ, Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org wrote: I think yes https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/public/org/apache/struts/struts2-core/2.3.16/ and this is verified by Nexus during Closing repository (I

Re: Lost JIRA admin rights to STR WW

Karma should be there again, enjoy the powers :) Am 20.06.14 16:45, schrieb Paul Benedict: Who, so mighty and powerful, can grant me the karma back? Cheers, Paul -- René Gielen http://twitter.com/rgielen - To

Re: Unable to intigrate Jasper report for struds2

Hi, actually this is the place to discuss the development of the Struts framework. To get support for developing applications based on Struts 2, the user mailing list is the place to find help: http://struts.apache.org/mail.html Regarding your particular problem: When you are going to rephrase

[ANN][SECURITY] Struts 1 - CVE-2014-0114 -Mitigation Advice Available, Possible RCE Impact

As confirmed in our last announcement, the Apache Struts 1 framework in all versions is affected by a ClassLoader manipulation vulnerability (CVE-2014-0114) similar to a recently fixed vulnerability in Struts 2 (CVE-2014-0112, CVE-2014-0094) [1]. Thanks to the efforts of Alvaro Munoz and the HP

[ANN][SECURITY] ClassLoader manipulation issue confirmed for Struts 1 - CVE-2014-0114

The Apache Struts project team confirms that Struts 1 in all versions is affected by a ClassLoader manipulation vulnerability similar to a recently fixed vulnerability in Struts 2 (CVE-2014-0112, CVE-2014-0094) [1]. This is a different underlying flaw. For future reference, please use

Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.16.2

+1 GA Thanks Lukasz! Am 24.04.14 23:13, schrieb Lukasz Lenart: The Struts 2.3.16.2 test build is now available. It includes the latest security patch which fixes two possible vulnerabilities: - Improves excluded params to avoid ClassLoader manipulation via ParametersInterceptor - Adds

[ANN] Struts 2 up to 2.3.16.1: Zero-Day Exploit Mitigation (security | critical)

In Struts 2.3.16.1, an issue with ClassLoader manipulation via request parameters was supposed to be resolved. Unfortunately, the correction wasn't sufficient. A security fix release fully addressing this issue is in preparation and will be released as soon as possible. Once the release is

Re: [CANCELLED][VOTE] Struts 2.3.17

Fair enough. For future votes we should keep in mind that that 72h is the minimum time. Given that a test drive of a full release takes it's time (for me ususally around 2 -3 hours), granting our users and developers a full week before cancelling the vote seems to be reasonable - even given the

Re: Time to start new release

Looks good. Great job, you are a machine ;) - René Am 30.03.14 20:52, schrieb Lukasz Lenart: Version Notes https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Version+Notes+2.3.17 Please take a look if everything is ok. Thanks! 2014-03-28 21:56 GMT+01:00 Lukasz Lenart

Re: New logo

By sudden I realized I forgot to comment so far - shame on me! Logo image idea / execution: fabulous Color scheme: 3rd ++, 2nd + Font: Yet undecided. My gut fav is 2nd, but I also agree with Lukasz that Aleo (1st) is classy. Is there a consensus about all uppercase writing? Am I too traditional

Re: [VOTE][FASTTRACK] Struts 2.3.16.1

Checked, no issues found. +1 GA (binding) - René Am 03.03.14 09:19, schrieb Lukasz Lenart: The Struts 2.3.16.1 test build is now available. It includes the latest security patch which fixes two possible vulnerabilities. For details and the rationale behind these changes, please consult the

Re: Git flow

Am 28.01.14 12:19, schrieb Lukasz Lenart: I don't think we need git-flow - we don't have huge development team, there is (almost) no situation when we work together on some issue/feature. And learning the whole flow is useless (at this moment). Then I'm wondering a bit why we wanted to move

Re: Git flow

Hey Lukasz others, sorry for chiming in a bit late, I'm suffering from heavy workload currently. Basically this idea looks quite good and straightforward to me. On the other hand, kind of a standard, named git-flow, seems to have established, which I find worth evaluating:

Re: Git flow

Am 16.01.14 14:14, schrieb Lukasz Lenart: Till we won't decide what flow to use, it's ok to commit directly to master branch. ... or maybe open some arbitrary feature-branch first? Regards - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Svn to Git migration

I wonder what the downside is to just put svn subtrees in question into read only mode compared to moving them to attic. As for placing a prominent notice, such as MOVED-TO-GIT-README.txt, it would be useful to our users in either case. Having a look at wicket, they just left svn at a point in

Re: Svn to Git migration

+1 Paul Benedict pbened...@apache.org schrieb: No, please don't move things to the attic. We published POMs and other links to the repository. We should just make it read-only. On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Johannes Geppert joh...@gmail.com wrote: Looks good to me! Thanks Łukasz for

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.3.16

+0 GA binding ... for now - I'm currently not able to give it a decent test drive, due to end-of-year madness. I may change my vote if I find some time, though. Great job Lukasz! - René Am 04.12.13 18:18, schrieb Lukasz Lenart: The Apache Struts 2.3.16 test build is now available. With this

Re: New logo

Am 20.11.13 14:52, schrieb Christian Grobmeier: On 12 Nov 2013, at 16:51, Lukasz Lenart wrote: 2013/11/12 Cameron Morris cmor...@part.net: I love the look of steampunk and rickety old bridges, but I think it sends the wrong message for a project fighting the perception of being old and

Re: Registering aliases from within a plugin

Hi Lukasz, what is the rationale behind refactoring out velocity support to a plugin? For which Struts version are you targeting this proposal? Regards, René Am 18.11.13 20:38, schrieb Lukasz Lenart: Hi, As I'm working in extracting Velocity support into a plugin, I have faced a small

Re: struts2 pull request: DeprecationInterceptor

It gets into moderation, I had to let it pass manually Am 23.10.2013 13:18 schrieb Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org: I overlooked that the info about pull request goes here ;-) Nice :-) 2013/10/23 lukaszlenart g...@git.apache.org: GitHub user lukaszlenart opened a pull request:

Re: struts2 pull request: DeprecationInterceptor

We might be able to add this to the accept list, but I'm not too sure if we want to do this - a spammer got misuse pull requests. On the other hands, we did not get too much pull requests so far. Am 23.10.13 13:51, schrieb Lukasz Lenart: ech... is it possible to automise that? 2013/10/23 Rene

Re: [ANN] Struts 2.3.15.3 GA release available - security fix

I'll step up first - I'll buy you a beer in Antwerp, given you will be attending Devoxx ;) Am 19.10.13 17:33, schrieb Lukasz Lenart: 2013/10/19 Dave Newton davelnew...@gmail.com: Definitely. We should do something nice for him. Ideas? Wat? ;-) Regards -- René Gielen

Re: [ANN] Struts 2.3.15.3 GA release available - security fix

Great job, Lukasz! Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org schrieb: The Apache Struts group is pleased to announce that Struts 2.3.15.3 is available as a General Availability release.The GA designation is our highest quality grade. Apache Struts 2 is an elegant, extensible framework for creating

Re: [trademark] The term Strutsathon

As a first reaction one might find the trademark discussion Christian brought up a bit picky, but it isn't. There has been a lot of traffic on the board list regarding trademark issues last year, resulting in an enforced policy for PMCs to watch and protect their and Apache's trademarks. You

Convention plugin and archetypes

Hi folks, one of the key facts that people don't get about Struts 2 is that XML is not needed for configuration. While I think that the Convention plugin needs to be moved (and be the default) for Struts NEXT, we could do something now to help our users. My suggestion is to rearrange the maven

Re: Svn to Git migration

Rene Gielen: I just wanted to get this clarified. Seems like we have an agreement :-) Am 17.09.2013 21:14 schrieb Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com: Am 17.09.13 21:06, schrieb Johannes Geppert: -1 for moving trunk only. We don't want to lose history, and we would not want two repositories

Re: [VOTE] [FAST TRACK] Struts 2.3.15.2

+1 GA (binding) Am 18.09.13 11:07, schrieb Lukasz Lenart: The Struts 2.3.15.2 test build is now available. It includes the latest security patches which fix two possible vulnerabilities. For details and the rationale behind these changes, please consult the corresponding security bulletins:

Re: Cleaning up struts/branches

Sounds good to me, +1 2013/9/17 Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org 2013/9/14 Philip Luppens philip.lupp...@gmail.com: On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org wrote: Hi, Before moving to GIT I'd like to clean up struts2/branches. As already

Re: Docs: Working on Struts main

-- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ 2013/9/15 Rene Gielen rene.gie...@gmail.com: Am 15.09.13 10:46, schrieb Lukasz Lenart: 2013/9/14 bphill...@ku.edu bphill...@ku.edu: For the Documentation menu items why not use Struts 2 and Struts 1 as menu choices instead

Re: Svn to Git migration

in short time), tags and trunk. I bet you are on the same page here. Johannes # web: http://www.jgeppert.com twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep 2013/9/13 Rene Gielen rene.gie...@gmail.com +1 for git flow as the way to go

Re: We are live :-)

Great job, guys. Clean and catchy, yet informative. Am 17.09.13 21:46, schrieb Ken McWilliams: Congratulations. It looks great. On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.comwrote: Hey all, we have a new main site, I just pulled the trigger :-)

Re: Docs: Working on Struts main

Am 15.09.13 10:46, schrieb Lukasz Lenart: 2013/9/14 bphill...@ku.edu bphill...@ku.edu: For the Documentation menu items why not use Struts 2 and Struts 1 as menu choices instead of Struts 2.3.x and Struts 1.3.x. When we release Struts 2.4 we'll have to change those. The page those menu items

Re: Docs: Working on Struts main

and the rest can be improved in meantime. 2013/9/10 Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com: Am 10.09.13 18:11, schrieb Rene Gielen: If I'd use [Publish Site] now in the Bookmarklet, the site gets - well - published. So better nobody would hit this unless we are sure to launch the reworked

Re: Svn to Git migration

+1 for git flow as the way to go, including excellent tooling - command line extensions, Atlassian Sourcetree support and even a IDEA plugin (https://github.com/OpherV/gitflow4idea) help to make this an elegant abstract and reliable workflow. -1 for moving trunk only. We don't want to lose

Re: Docs: Working on Struts main

http://struts.staging.apache.org/ Am 13.09.2013 18:35 schrieb Paul Benedict pbened...@apache.org: Where can I see the new website before it goes live? On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Rene Gielen rene.gie...@gmail.com wrote: As this a major change, a formal vote might be a valid option

Re: Svn to Git migration

Lukasz, Please clarify - is it the idea to leave site, struts1 etc in San (agreed) or to move struts2/TRUNK *only*, that is not moving struts2/branches and struts2/tags? For the latter, I'm absolutely -1 - it's my strong opinion that we should move the full struts 2 scm repo tree, thus working in

Re: svn commit: r1521940 - in /struts/struts2/trunk: apps/jboss-blank/ archetypes/ archetypes/struts2-archetype-angularjs/ archetypes/struts2-archetype-blank/ archetypes/struts2-archetype-convention/

Johannes, Could you please remove the IDEA .iml files you committed? Thanks René Am 11.09.2013 19:06 schrieb jo...@apache.org: Author: jogep Date: Wed Sep 11 17:06:05 2013 New Revision: 1521940 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1521940 Log: WW-4197 Update Archetypes READMEs Added:

Re: Docs: Working on Struts main

You guys are aware that we cannot publish to live anymore now? We would rollout the new site then. 2013/9/10 Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org Uh... uh... osm :-) 2013/9/10 Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com: Am 10.09.13 14:18, schrieb Lukasz Lenart: OSM! :-) I'd just move

Re: Docs: Working on Struts main

want to make sure anybody is aware of this (as long as I'm not missing something here). - René 2013/9/10 Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com Am 10.09.13 14:40, schrieb Lukasz Lenart: 2013/9/10 Rene Gielen rene.gie...@gmail.com: You guys are aware that we cannot publish to live anymore

Re: Something to think about maybe

As you might know, we had a hackathon this weekend in Augsburg, Germany (http://strutsathon.opensource.io/) where we experimented a bit with available options and requierements. One of the outcomes was that we may want to start with a real user guide that helps to get started and addresses common

Re: Docs: Working on Struts main

While this isn't a full review, some first impressions: - Landing page: Key Technologies section (left bottom div) is redundant given the Technology Primer link in the hero bar. I would rather recommend to place the most important announcement (such as security announcement / latest release info)

Re: Setting up environment locally

Am 04.09.13 14:52, schrieb Christian Grobmeier: Am 04.09.13 14:47, schrieb shekher awasthi: Hi Lukas, I have maven as well Eclipse in place, should i just build them and than i am ready to start (Confused :() With eclipse i think you should do: mvn eclipse:eclipse Although I'm also

Re: Spring Plugin Documentation

, and we have not yet a working solution for publishing such exorts periodically. Pleas use Confluence as the cannonical source of draft docs: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Spring+Plugin - René On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 5:15 AM, Rene Gielen rene.gie...@gmail.com wrote: Am 10.08.13

Re: Spring Plugin Documentation

Am 10.08.13 07:42, schrieb Steven Benitez: Never mind, this looks to be driven by Confluence and I don't have permission to make changes. Can someone update this document accordingly? Fixed. If you want to help fixing Confluence docs, you need to file a CLA. Then we could give you edit

Re: FYI

Am 06.08.13 07:39, schrieb Lukasz Lenart: 2013/8/5 Dave Newton davelnew...@gmail.com: I expect most of you already saw (or assumed) this, but just in case: https://confluence.atlassian.com/display/DOC/Confluence+Security+Advisory+2013-08-05 Oh OGNL. Last time guys from Atlassian contacted

Re: username\password prompt

-DskipAssembly is the way to go as long as Confluence requires a login to use the web service interface and you don't have one. Also, if you don't need the full docs in your local build the docs assembly phase is really one you would like to skip given the time it takes. If you want to add a

Re: Not calling ParameterNameAware.acceptableParameterName when implemented - since xwork 2.3.7

Am 13.07.13 22:38, schrieb Przemysław Celej: Hi, [...] Please consider writing version notes more carefully when you doing such changes, I'm sure that most developers who rely on ParameterNameAware inteface doesn't know that in recent versions of Struts this behaviour has changed. No

[ANN] Struts 2.3.15.1 GA (fast track | security | critical)

The Apache Struts group is pleased to announce that Struts 2.3.15.1 is available as a General Availability release. The GA designation is our highest quality grade. Apache Struts 2 is an elegant, extensible framework for creating enterprise-ready Java web applications. The framework is designed

Re: [VOTE] [FAST TRACK] Struts 2.3.15.1

+1 GA, binding - René Am 15.07.13 00:15, schrieb Rene Gielen: The Struts 2.3.15.1 test build is now available. It includes the latest security patches which fix two possible vulnerabilities. For details and the rationale behind these changes, please consult the corresponding security

Re: [VOTE] [CLOSED] [FAST TRACK] Struts 2.3.15.1

The vote has closed with following result: 5 +1 GA (binding) I'm going to release 2.3.15.1 as soon as possible. Thanks, René Am 15.07.13 00:15, schrieb Rene Gielen: The Struts 2.3.15.1 test build is now available. It includes the latest security patches which fix two possible vulnerabilities

[VOTE] [FAST TRACK] Struts 2.3.15.1

The Struts 2.3.15.1 test build is now available. It includes the latest security patches which fix two possible vulnerabilities. For details and the rationale behind these changes, please consult the corresponding security bulletins: * https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/S2-016 *

Re: IMPORTANT: Major Confluence Upgrade Coming Soon. Please review test instance now.

Will hopefully being able to check tomorrow Am 27.06.13 22:11, schrieb Lukasz Lenart: Can you take a look on that [1]? I don't know how to setup SiteExporter to get it running :\ [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-4130 Regards -- René Gielen http://twitter.com/rgielen

Re: Struts annotations limited to specific methods

This sounds a bit like inversion of control. As for me, I'd rather not like to have my model (which is to validate) to have knowledge about the business side validation is triggered from. When I develop from the action perpective, I know if the current method is better off triggering validation or

[ANN] New Struts Committer -Bruce Phillips

Please join us in welcoming Bruce Phillips as a new Struts committer. Bruce has done a great job in keeping our docs alive, including the authoring of various Getting Started and Tutorial examples. Welcome, bphillips@ ... great to have you on board now! - René -- René Gielen

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.3.15

+1 GA (binding) Am 19.06.13 09:15, schrieb Lukasz Lenart: The Struts 2.3.14 test build is now available. With this release: - merged security fix from version 2.3.14.1, 2.3.14.2 and 2.3.14.3 - resolved problem with memory leak in ContainerHolder - resolved bug related to

Re: IMPORTANT: Major Confluence Upgrade Coming Soon. Please review test instance now.

Am 18.06.13 15:41, schrieb Lukasz Lenart: Hi, I have edited one page [1] but after migration it will pain-in-the-ass to change anything :\ Maybe it's time to migrate to Markdown format? [1] https://cwiki2.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Version+Notes+2.3.15 Regards CSS for warning

  1   2   3   4   5   >