Re: Next steps for Action 1.3.1 (was Re: Reasons for 1.3 release)

2006-02-20 Thread Wolfgang Gehner
. We like passing the ServletActionContext through; we even fill the Struts Chain with our own augmented one that extends ServletActionContext :-) Very clean and simple code is the result. And the 1.3 release code it is great as it is! Wolfgang Gehner www.infonoia.com Paul Benedict wrote

1.3 sample download size

2006-02-20 Thread Wolfgang Gehner
Struts 1.3 sample code (without DB) in the download for this article: http://www.infonoia.com/en/content.jsp?d=inf.05.09 (40MB to get started). Wolfgang Michael Jouravlev wrote: On 2/20/06, Wolfgang Gehner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is a non-committer speaking (me): The CoR stuff

Re: 1.3 action pre-release, does jsp:include page=/do/myAct / work?

2006-02-13 Thread Wolfgang Gehner
Wendy Smoak wrote: On 2/13/06, Wolfgang Gehner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys, I just plopped the nightlies of Feb 12 into a project (struts_action) and jsp:include page=/do/myAct / doesn't work for me (: Always did with 1.1, 1.2 I think I had previously raised a bug on this, but I

Uber-Tiles osgi-fied Struts with Cedric Dumoulin

2006-02-01 Thread Wolfgang Gehner
that meets their internal needs for easier componentized applications. Wolfgang Gehner wgehner [at] infonoia [dot] com -- Infonoia SA 7 rue de Berne 1211 Geneva 1 Tel: +41 22 9000 009 Fax: +41 22 9000 018 http://www.infonoia.com [EMAIL PROTECTED

[ANN] Article on Eclipse goes ServerSide - from RCP to RSP - Discuss

2006-01-19 Thread Wolfgang Gehner
involves the Eclipse community. Please join in the discussion! Enjoy! Wolfgang Gehner - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [POLL] Struts Action Framework tagline

2006-01-10 Thread Wolfgang Gehner
: please forgive me bringing it up again. James just struck a chord. Wolfgang Gehner James Mitchell wrote: I didn't realize we had a default. If [Action] is the default, then [Action 2.x] or [Action2] (thanks Wendy) makes perfect sense. I never did pipe up during the what do we call

Re: Struts Action Framework - Struts CORe

2005-11-13 Thread Wolfgang Gehner
the fact that 1.3 is NEW, more open (flexible wiring is what sells Spring), abd a *CORE* piece of solid code infrastructure. That's why I believe in Struts CORe. Wolfgang Gehner L. Ted Husted wrote: The website seems to be in pretty good shape now. I just ran build-all

Re: Struts Core Library versioning

2005-11-03 Thread Wolfgang Gehner
How Eclipse recommends their plugin versions, for RCP apps: a distro such as 3.1 can have modules (plugins) that have different versions, but the recommended way is to push the distro version to the plugins, so whatever plugins were 3.1.4 or whatever become 3.2.0 in the next distro. People

Struts 1.3 release naming

2005-11-01 Thread Wolfgang Gehner
on something new. Neither is the case here. Also, would anyone want to step forward and be vocal about what is new with Struts 1.3 (1.5) in discussions like http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=37365 ? Kind regards, Wolfgang Gehner

Re: Struts 1.3 release naming

2005-11-01 Thread Wolfgang Gehner
think that a web application framework should be decided on the requriements. I think there should be one good one for all requirements that occur in 99% of all web applications. Best regards, Marky Wolfgang Gehner wrote: I have a humble suggestion, as 1.3 release seems to be eminent. I've

Re: Struts 1.3 release naming - Struts CORE

2005-11-01 Thread Wolfgang Gehner
. Kindest regards, Wolfgang Gehner - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Struts 1.3 release naming - Struts CORE

2005-11-01 Thread Wolfgang Gehner
see why people could be confused. Is Shale part part of the six original subprojects, and thus part of Struts Original? I maintain that the new RequestProcessor and COR is not classic, but new. And that COR should be highlighted as such, new. Wolfgang Ted Husted wrote: On 11/1/05, Wolfgang

Re: Struts 1.3 release naming - Struts CORE

2005-11-01 Thread Wolfgang Gehner
in that respect. One reason why I personally like CORE is because it contains COR, of course, so it's easy to explain and remember with that pattern. I use Struts CORE with XXX just has a nice modern ring to it. But I repeat myself... Wolfgang Gehner Michael Jouravlev wrote: On 11/1/05, Ted

Re: [Struts 1.3] Using Commons Chains instead of Action(s)

2005-10-13 Thread Wolfgang Gehner
to Struts 1.3 (250MB download) to get a head start on 1.3 (need to register to access). at www.infonoia.com community downloads section. Best regards, Wolfgang Gehner Matthias Wessendorf wrote: Hi all, I have updated some apps to 1.3, that went pretty smooth :-) (Thanks to the good

Re: Struts 1.3 issue with commons-validator-1.2.0 dev

2005-10-03 Thread Wolfgang Gehner
: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=264683view=rev The issue is in Commons Validator (rather than Struts) - probably best if you open a bugzilla ticket against Commons Validator for this. Niall - Original Message - From: Wolfgang Gehner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 8

Re: Thread-unsafe Command classes

2005-09-24 Thread Wolfgang Gehner
. If your arbitrary class isn't threadsafe, rather than modifying that arbitrary class to implement Command you should write a complementary Command which knows how to use that class in a threadsafe manner. Make sense? Joe At 9:49 AM +0200 9/23/05, Wolfgang Gehner wrote: Hi there, I

Thread-unsafe Command classes

2005-09-23 Thread Wolfgang Gehner
parameter is present, and how to (a question to commons-chain). That should also be made VERY evident in the Docs. We are just deploying a 400 screens application we wrote on Struts 1.3, and it works great! of course our commands are all thread-safe. Kind regards, Wolfgang Gehner

Re: Change Action, ActionForm to use ActionContext?

2005-02-14 Thread Wolfgang Gehner
plugins, on startup (say, look for all xml's that use struts_1_3.dtd). Wolfgang Gehner Joe Germuska wrote: At 2:05 PM -0800 2/13/05, Don Brown wrote: I don't mind sticking ActionContext everywhere as it is better than having the code rely directly on the servlet api, but since we are talking

Action threadsafe

2005-02-14 Thread Wolfgang Gehner
=/testAct command=testCmd catalog=testCat name=testBean scope=session validate=false add this shortcut: action path=/testAct commandClass=com.mD.test.NewCmd name=testBean scope=session validate=false While type=a.b.c.xxxAction goes to classic Action. Wolfgang Gehner

Action, Form, Context

2005-02-14 Thread Wolfgang Gehner
Joe Germuska wrote: At 4:18 PM +0100 2/14/05, Wolfgang Gehner wrote: add this shortcut: action path=/testAct commandClass=com.mD.test.NewCmd name=testBean scope=session validate=false While type=a.b.c.xxxAction goes to classic Action. I've been thinking about something like this; I was even

Re: ActionContext chain changes committed

2005-02-07 Thread Wolfgang Gehner
tomorrow based on the nightly build of tonight's svn. Best regards, Wolfgang Gehner Joe Germuska wrote: I have just committed the suite of changes I was emailing about a few weeks ago. Please be aware that nightly builds are probably now the least stable that they've been in some time. I have

TilesPlugin RequestProcessor compatibility check issue

2005-02-04 Thread Wolfgang Gehner
, as in: configProcessorClass.isAssignableFrom(tilesProcessorClass) IsAssignable is the inversion of extends, and I guess the test should be if tilesProcessorClass extends configProcessorClass, i.e. Best regards, Wolfgang Gehner Co-author Struts Best Practices http://www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/ASIN/3898642844 http

1.3 TilesPreProcessor should convert forward to include if action is called from definition

2005-02-04 Thread Wolfgang Gehner
? //Added (Wolfgang Gehner): If response is already committed, //we believe this action was called from from within a definition, //as in definition ...put name=mytile content=/do/myAct / //Should do an include instead of a forward. if (swcontext.getResponse().isCommitted()) { log.debug(response