On 4/30/06, Ian Roughley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Cooper wrote:
On 4/28/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I call a vote that the Struts PMC accept the WebWork 2 podling as
having
met the incubation requirements and thereby be
accepted by the Apache Struts project as Struts
Martin Cooper wrote:
On 4/30/06, Ian Roughley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Cooper wrote:
On 4/28/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I call a vote that the Struts PMC accept the WebWork 2 podling as
having
met the incubation requirements and thereby be
accepted by the Apache
I'm ok if you want to just remove the copyright. BTW - the copyright
assignment form was faxed monday (5/1).
/Ian
--
From Down Around, Inc.
Innovative IT Solutions
Software Architecture * Design * Development
~
web: www.fdar.com
email
+1 - great work guys.
I had a computer crash at home last weekend and couldn't be online ;(
-
Posted via Jive Forums
http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=28608messageID=55964#55964
On 4/28/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I call a vote that the Struts PMC accept the WebWork 2 podling as having met
the incubation requirements and thereby be
accepted by the Apache Struts project as Struts Action 2.
Status: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/webwork2.html
[ ] +1
Martin Cooper wrote:
On 4/28/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I call a vote that the Struts PMC accept the WebWork 2 podling as having
met the incubation requirements and thereby be
accepted by the Apache Struts project as Struts Action 2.
A couple of things I noticed on a quick scan:
On 5/1/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Cooper wrote:
On 4/28/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I call a vote that the Struts PMC accept the WebWork 2 podling as
having
met the incubation requirements and thereby be
accepted by the Apache Struts project as Struts Action
See comments inline...
* There are still quite a few files that have OS copyrights but not ASF
ones.
* PortletUrlTagTest.java has a copyright for BEKK Consulting but not one
for
the ASF. Are we sure we're OK for IP on this one?
Just contacted Nils-Helge Garli about this. He contributed the
* PortletUrlTagTest.java has a copyright for BEKK Consulting but not one
for
the ASF. Are we sure we're OK for IP on this one?
Just contacted Nils-Helge Garli about this. He contributed the code and I
remember that for all other contributed files the copyright was changed.
Looks like this
Martin Cooper wrote:
On 4/28/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I call a vote that the Struts PMC accept the WebWork 2 podling as having
met the incubation requirements and thereby be
accepted by the Apache Struts project as Struts Action 2.
A couple of things I noticed on a quick
+1 (Not that my vote counts but it runs all my apps)
On 4/28/06, Rainer Hermanns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 from me and a big thank you to everyone involved
On Apr 28, 2006, at 20:19 , Don Brown wrote:
I call a vote that the Struts PMC accept the WebWork 2 podling as
having met the
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
Question: looking at the status page, I don't seem to find any mention of
some of the licensing issues that were being discussed a while back...
IIRC, there was some concern about a calendar widget for example, among
other things. Am I just missing it on the page? Or
+1
rgds
- Original Message
From: Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List dev@struts.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, 29 April, 2006 2:19:30 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Accept and Graduate WebWork 2 Podling to Struts
I call a vote that the Struts PMC accept the WebWork 2 podling
+1
- Original Message
From: tm jee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List dev@struts.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2006 9:37:53 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept and Graduate WebWork 2 Podling to Struts
+1
rgds
- Original Message
From: Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED
, 2006 9:37:53 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept and Graduate WebWork 2 Podling to Struts
+1
rgds
- Original Message
From: Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List dev@struts.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, 29 April, 2006 2:19:30 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Accept and Graduate WebWork 2
@struts.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2006 9:37:53 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept and Graduate WebWork 2 Podling to Struts
+1
rgds
- Original Message
From: Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List dev@struts.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, 29 April, 2006 2:19:30 AM
Subject
On 4/28/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I call a vote that the Struts PMC accept the WebWork 2 podling as having
met the incubation requirements and thereby be
accepted by the Apache Struts project as Struts Action 2.
Status: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/webwork2.html
[X] +1
On 4/28/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I call a vote that the Struts PMC accept the WebWork 2 podling as having
met the incubation requirements and thereby be
accepted by the Apache Struts project as Struts Action 2.
A couple of things I noticed on a quick scan:
* One of the files
I call a vote that the Struts PMC accept the WebWork 2 podling as having met the incubation requirements and thereby be
accepted by the Apache Struts project as Struts Action 2.
Status: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/webwork2.html
[ ] +1 Let's bring it in, and I'm committed to the
+1
Git 'r dun!!
--
James Mitchell
On Apr 28, 2006, at 2:19 PM, Don Brown wrote:
I call a vote that the Struts PMC accept the WebWork 2 podling as
having met the incubation requirements and thereby be accepted by
the Apache Struts project as Struts Action 2.
Status:
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Question: looking at the status page, I don't seem to find any mention of
some of the licensing issues that were being discussed a while back...
IIRC, there was some concern about a calendar widget for example, among
other things. Am I just missing it on the page? Or have they not been
resolved?
All those issues have been resolved, but are not listed specifically in that status page. They are covered under the IP
checklist, however.
Don
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
Question: looking at the status page, I don't seem to find any mention of
some of the licensing issues that were being
+1
-
Posted via Jive Forums
http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=28608messageID=55540#55540
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
+0. I'd say +1, but it looks like it will be a bit before I have a
chance to get more involved.
Greg
On Apr 28, 2006, at 1:19 PM, Don Brown wrote:
I call a vote that the Struts PMC accept the WebWork 2 podling as
having met the incubation requirements and thereby be accepted by
the
Jason Carreira wrote:
+1
I wonder... has anybody in the history of this whole incubator thing
who was getting incubated ever vote against being graduated? As in:
Hey, I wanna stay in here longer... it's nice and warm...
or...
I don't think I quite get the Apache Way yet. I need to get
+0 (non-binding) with the same caveat.
L.
Greg Reddin wrote:
+0. I'd say +1, but it looks like it will be a bit before I have a
chance to get more involved.
Greg
On Apr 28, 2006, at 1:19 PM, Don Brown wrote:
I call a vote that the Struts PMC accept the WebWork 2 podling as
having met the
+1
On 4/28/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I call a vote that the Struts PMC accept the WebWork 2 podling as having met the
incubation requirements and thereby be
accepted by the Apache Struts project as Struts Action 2.
+1 Show time !
On 4/28/06, Laurie Harper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+0 (non-binding) with the same caveat.
L.
Greg Reddin wrote:
+0. I'd say +1, but it looks like it will be a bit before I have a
chance to get more involved.
Greg
On Apr 28, 2006, at 1:19 PM, Don Brown wrote:
I call a
+1 from me and a big thank you to everyone involved
On Apr 28, 2006, at 20:19 , Don Brown wrote:
I call a vote that the Struts PMC accept the WebWork 2 podling as
having met the incubation requirements and thereby be accepted by
the Apache Struts project as Struts Action 2.
Status:
30 matches
Mail list logo
