Re: What binds us (Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.6 Quality)

2004-12-05 Thread Eddie Bush
] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2004 12:08 PM Subject: What binds us (Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.6 Quality) As always, everyone is invited to vote on everything. :) The website is still a little out of synch with what has been decided on the dev list. Right now

Re: What binds us (Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.6 Quality)

2004-12-05 Thread Niall Pemberton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2004 7:06 PM Subject: Re: What binds us (Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.6 Quality) Good stuff :-) Thanks Ted and Niall for the clarification. My apologies, again, if I came off as being obtuse. I just wasn't seeing it. Niall's message helped, and I really

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.6 Quality

2004-12-03 Thread Joe Germuska
At 10:51 PM -0800 12/2/04, Martin Cooper wrote: My own vote... Beta. While a number of issues have been reported, my opinion is that #32490 is enough to preclude GA, since I believe we need to have the tag libraries in sync for a GA release. I agree: Beta. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.6 Quality

2004-12-03 Thread Eddie Bush
] Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 12:49 AM Subject: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.6 Quality The Struts 1.2.6 test build has been available for about two weeks now. Once you have had a chance to form an opinion on the quality of this build, please respond to the following vote. - Based on its quality

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.6 Quality

2004-12-03 Thread Eddie Bush
] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 12:49 AM Subject: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.6 Quality The Struts 1.2.6 test build has been available for about two weeks now. Once you have had a chance to form an opinion on the quality of this build, please respond

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.6 Quality

2004-12-03 Thread Niall Pemberton
PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004 3:57 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.6 Quality I don't see a difference, Martin. It's moot to me. I haven't had time to test it, so I hadn't intended to voice any input. I

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.6 Quality

2004-12-03 Thread Niall Pemberton
PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 6:51 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.6 Quality My own vote... Beta. While a number of issues have been reported, my opinion is that #32490 is enough to preclude GA, since I believe we need to have the tag libraries in sync for a GA release

[VOTE] Struts 1.2.6 Quality

2004-12-02 Thread Martin Cooper
The Struts 1.2.6 test build has been available for about two weeks now. Once you have had a chance to form an opinion on the quality of this build, please respond to the following vote. - Based on its quality, the Struts 1.2.6 build should be classified as: [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] General

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.6 Quality

2004-12-02 Thread Martin Cooper
My own vote... Beta. While a number of issues have been reported, my opinion is that #32490 is enough to preclude GA, since I believe we need to have the tag libraries in sync for a GA release. -- Martin Cooper On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 22:49:35 -0800, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The