There's a annotation type ImplementedBy in online doc but I can't find and
use it in 1.0rc2 jar, is it deprecated?
regards
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Guice-1.0rc2-tf3290939.html#a9304687
Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com
There's a annotation type ImplementedBy in online doc but I can't find and
use it in 1.0rc2 jar, is it deprecated?
regards
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Guice-1.0rc2-tf3290939.html#a9304688
Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com
There's a annotation type ImplementedBy in online doc but I can't find and
use it in 1.0rc2 jar, is it deprecated?
regards
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Guice-1.0rc2-tf3290939.html#a9304689
Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com
in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Guice-1.0rc2-tf3290939.html#a9304687
Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2/26/07, Konstantin Priblouda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
U, strictly speaking, that's still code. ;)
Strictly speaking yes. But it is externalized and
does not impose anything on used classes.
It imposes something on me, the programmer.
What if I like to use another session impl in
--- Bob Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/26/07, Konstantin Priblouda
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
U, strictly speaking, that's still code. ;)
Strictly speaking yes. But it is externalized and
does not impose anything on used classes.
It imposes something on me, the
Perhaps a better venue for this discussion would be the Guide
developers mailing list.
* http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice
-Ted.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
On 2/27/07, Konstantin Priblouda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pico approach at least leaves your managed classes
alone.
Right, and Guice supports both approaches (the external approach via custom
providers which are roughly equivalent to Pico's external configuration).
Strictly speaking, pico
You're right. Sorry for the noise.
On 2/27/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps a better venue for this discussion would be the Guide
developers mailing list.
* http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice
-Ted.
-
But... we'll miss the fisticuffs.
--- Bob Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're right. Sorry for the noise.
On 2/27/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps a better venue for this discussion would
be the Guide
developers mailing list.
*
On 2/27/07, Dave Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But... we'll miss the fisticuffs.
Not if you sign up for the Guice mailing list. :)
Konstantin, you're more than welcome to try peddling Pico on our list. ;)
Bob
--- Paul Benedict [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob,
I see some interesting similarities to other
projects. Tapestry has an
@Inject annotation, and Spring has a @Required
annotation. I guess my
question is why would someone prefer Guice support
over Spring? I read
the Why Guice? section,
On 2/26/07, Konstantin Priblouda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would ask why to prefer guice over
pico/nanocontainer instead ;)
Type checking, performance, documentation, less code, generic types support,
cleaner configuration (Guice uses a nice EDSL), no setter method
requirement, up front
--- Bob Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Bob,
I'd like to say that I'm codeveloper of
pico/nanocontainer.
Type checking, performance, documentation, less
code, generic types support,
cleaner configuration (Guice uses a nice EDSL), no
setter method
requirement, up front error checking
On 2/26/07, Konstantin Priblouda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Bob Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Pico is also integated with WW2 and struts ( if not -
I can contribute it if you like )
regards,
Afaik, there's no Pico plugin available for Struts 2. So, yes,
Konstantin, if you're
There is no pico/nanocontainer support in struts2 at the moment. (I
don't think it made it over in the merger) IMO this is best
implemented as an external plugin anyhow. All external plugins thus
far have used googlecode to host their projects. If you do create
this plugin, please register
On 2/26/07, Konstantin Priblouda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Bob,
I'd like to say that I'm codeveloper of
pico/nanocontainer.
I've used Pico and Nano. Nano uses my AOP framework. You should try Guice.
What's important is that you don't depend on the
implementation. Depending
on the
On 2/26/07, Bob Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/26/07, Konstantin Priblouda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Bob,
I'd like to say that I'm codeveloper of
pico/nanocontainer.
I've used Pico and Nano. Nano uses my AOP framework. You should try Guice.
What's important is that you don't depend
On 2/26/07, Konstantin Priblouda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using these key objects is more verbose than using
annotations with Guice.
Not necessarily. There are no references to keys in
my code, only in container buildup. And only in
cases where this is necessary.
My point still holds
On 2/26/07, Bob Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bind(Session.class)
.annotatedWith(Secure.class)
.to(FailoverSessionDelegator.class);
Then apply @Inject @Secure wherever you want a secure Session. You can
obviously reuse the @Secure annotation elsewhere, too.
If I were to really implement
--- Tom Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no pico/nanocontainer support in struts2 at
the moment. (I
don't think it made it over in the merger) IMO this
is best
implemented as an external plugin anyhow. All
external plugins thus
far have used googlecode to host their
On 2/26/07, Konstantin Priblouda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If S2 architecture is the same than WW2, then it is
not necessary to register it as plugin - it's just an
object factory and couple of filters ( which are
independet of S2/WW )
XWork 2 uses an older version of Guice to wire together
--- Bob Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/26/07, Konstantin Priblouda
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If S2 architecture is the same than WW2, then it
is
not necessary to register it as plugin - it's just
an
object factory and couple of filters ( which are
independet of S2/WW )
--- Konstantin Priblouda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm still using XW 1.x because I'm using WW2
( can not move to S2 yet due to 1.5+ requirement )
FWIW the Retro'd jars have (so far) worked flawlessly
for us on Weblogic 8.1/JDK1.4.2_08.
d.
The architecture between webwork and struts2 has changed.
Every other project that provides the same functionality, (e.g.
Plexus, Spring, etc.) was written as a plugin in Struts2. Technically
it is possible to use the object factories, interceptors, etc. without
using the plugin architecture
--- Bob Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My point still holds true--Pico requires more code
than Guice.
Structly speaking using pico in a webapp requires no
code at all (except of course container configuration
in xml or whatever else)
And annotation introduces explicit dependency to
--- Dave Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Konstantin Priblouda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm still using XW 1.x because I'm using WW2
( can not move to S2 yet due to 1.5+ requirement )
FWIW the Retro'd jars have (so far) worked
flawlessly
for us on Weblogic 8.1/JDK1.4.2_08.
WW
On 2/26/07, Konstantin Priblouda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My point still holds true--Pico requires more code
than Guice.
Structly speaking using pico in a webapp requires no
code at all (except of course container configuration
in xml or whatever else)
U, strictly speaking, that's
--- Konstantin Priblouda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WW 8.1.6 has some other bugs,
That's being very polite ;) WW drives me nuts.
I was just saying that the J4 distro seems to work
well.
d.
Don't get
--- Dave Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Konstantin Priblouda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
WW 8.1.6 has some other bugs,
That's being very polite ;) WW drives me nuts.
( I meant WLS )
You do not have support contract? If yes, it is even
more fun ;)
regards,
[ Konstantin
--- Bob Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/26/07, Konstantin Priblouda
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My point still holds true--Pico requires more
code
than Guice.
Structly speaking using pico in a webapp requires
no
code at all (except of course container
configuration
in xml or
Guice has come along way since we copied the source over into XWork. If
anyone would like to try out Guice with Struts 2.0.6, we've included a
plugin jar in the latest distribution:
http://google-guice.googlecode.com/files/guice-1.0rc2.zip
And instructions for using Guice with Struts 2
wrote:
Guice has come along way since we copied the source over into XWork. If
anyone would like to try out Guice with Struts 2.0.6, we've included a
plugin jar in the latest distribution:
http://google-guice.googlecode.com/files/guice-1.0rc2.zip
And instructions for using Guice with Struts 2
, we've included a
plugin jar in the latest distribution:
http://google-guice.googlecode.com/files/guice-1.0rc2.zip
And instructions for using Guice with Struts 2 in the users' guide:
http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dd2fhx4z_5df5hw8
The users' guide is in dire need of help, we know. Kevin B
34 matches
Mail list logo
