Re: Struts 2.0.10 versus 2.1.0

2007-08-22 Thread James Mitchell
If there isn't already a Maven plugin to do that, create a Jira ticket and give detailed instructions on how to do it and I'll create it for you. -- James Mitchell On Aug 21, 2007, at 9:50 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote: +1 on that. I just need to update the compressed javascripts which I

Re: Struts 2.0.10 versus 2.1.0

2007-08-22 Thread Ted Husted
How does the Dojo plugin compare to the YUI plugin? Does the YUI plugin use the Yahoo hosted scripts? (Thereby eliminating the bundling issue.) On 8/21/07, Musachy Barroso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 on that. I just need to update the compressed javascripts which I will do tomorrow. By the

Re: Struts 2.0.10 versus 2.1.0

2007-08-22 Thread Tom Schneider
I could see 2 ways of handling this and you'll have to provide your input as to which makes more sense: 1. Treat the compressed javascript as a maven artifact and create a custom maven mojo and artifact type to handle it. 2. Use the maven antrun plugin or the assembly plugin to create the

Re: Struts 2.0.10 versus 2.1.0

2007-08-22 Thread Musachy Barroso
The YUI plugin is just including the js files provided by YUI musachy On 8/22/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How does the Dojo plugin compare to the YUI plugin? Does the YUI plugin use the Yahoo hosted scripts? (Thereby eliminating the bundling issue.) On 8/21/07, Musachy Barroso

RE: Struts 2.0.10 versus 2.1.0

2007-08-22 Thread James Holmes
, August 21, 2007 8:55 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Struts 2.0.10 versus 2.1.0 There's always more that we want to do, but is there anything so unstable in the HEAD that we couldn't go a head and release a 2.1.0 build? -Ted

Re: Struts 2.0.10 versus 2.1.0

2007-08-22 Thread Ted Husted
don't want Struts 2.1 to take as long as Struts 1.1 did. Let's roll a beta! James -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted Husted Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 8:55 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Struts 2.0.10 versus 2.1.0

Re: Struts 2.0.10 versus 2.1.0

2007-08-22 Thread Nils-Helge Garli
, August 21, 2007 8:55 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Struts 2.0.10 versus 2.1.0 There's always more that we want to do, but is there anything so unstable in the HEAD that we couldn't go a head and release a 2.1.0 build? -Ted

Re: Struts 2.0.10 versus 2.1.0

2007-08-22 Thread Tom Schneider
Looks to me like the maven antrun plugin would be a good choice for implementing this: http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-antrun-plugin/run-mojo.html It would just be a matter of implementing the ant scripts for this in the plugin's pom. Tom On 8/22/07, Musachy Barroso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: Struts 2.0.10 versus 2.1.0

2007-08-22 Thread Rene Gielen
Am Mi, 22.08.2007, 16:51, schrieb Ted Husted: I expect that we would want to move anything for 2.0.10 (resolved or not) to 2.1.0, and anything slated for 2.0.11 to 2.1.1. -1 for moving any issue now. 2.1 is not a simple drop in replacement for 2.0.x AFAICS. I would expect a (hopefully short

Re: Struts 2.0.10 versus 2.1.0

2007-08-22 Thread Dale Newfield
Musachy Barroso wrote: By the way I forgot to bring this up, the compressed javascript files(custom Dojo build) is not built using maven, currently I build them on my machine and commit them, does anybody know how to automate that? I added a text file with instructions to the dojo plugin along

Re: Struts 2.0.10 versus 2.1.0

2007-08-22 Thread Ted Husted
On 8/22/07, Rene Gielen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2.1 is not a simple drop in replacement for 2.0.x AFAICS. I would expect a (hopefully short time) where the 2.0.x tree still might need maintainance, True, but we now have both 2.0.10 and 2.0.11 on the roadmap. We should also take a critical look

Re: Struts 2.0.10 versus 2.1.0

2007-08-22 Thread Musachy Barroso
I'm using 2.1 on development, and it is working fine so far. musachy On 8/22/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/22/07, Rene Gielen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2.1 is not a simple drop in replacement for 2.0.x AFAICS. I would expect a (hopefully short time) where the 2.0.x tree still

Re: Struts 2.0.10 versus 2.1.0

2007-08-22 Thread James Holmes
I am also using 2.1 and it is working great for me. On Wed Aug 22 14:18 , 'Musachy Barroso' [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent: I'm using 2.1 on development, and it is working fine so far. musachy On 8/22/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/22/07, Rene Gielen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2.1 is

Struts 2.0.10 versus 2.1.0

2007-08-21 Thread Ted Husted
There's always more that we want to do, but is there anything so unstable in the HEAD that we couldn't go a head and release a 2.1.0 build? -Ted. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Struts 2.0.10 versus 2.1.0

2007-08-21 Thread Don Brown
Agreed, I'd like to see us pushing the 2.1 trunk more. If nothing else, it will make a nice beta. Don On 8/22/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There's always more that we want to do, but is there anything so unstable in the HEAD that we couldn't go a head and release a 2.1.0 build?

Re: Struts 2.0.10 versus 2.1.0

2007-08-21 Thread Musachy Barroso
+1 on that. I just need to update the compressed javascripts which I will do tomorrow. By the way I forgot to bring this up, the compressed javascript files(custom Dojo build) is not built using maven, currently I build them on my machine and commit them, does anybody know how to automate that?