We must wait with that, till we solve the issue with Ognl
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/
2011/6/7 Maurizio Cucchiara mcucchi...@apache.org:
+1 for package renaming
-1 for the lost of the separation
That's right just to rename the packages ... and we will see what next.
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/
2011/6/5 Steven Benitez steven.beni...@gmail.com:
Perhaps migrate the package structure to
+1 for package renaming
-1 for the lost of the separation between web and non-web stuff
On 7 June 2011 08:20, Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com wrote:
That's right just to rename the packages ... and we will see what next.
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122
2011/6/2 Jeff Black jeffrey.bl...@yahoo.com:
What all does merging entail?
Mainly to have one struts-core instead of struts-core and xwork-core -
but we still discussing the best option.
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura
On Jun 5, 2011, at 2:37 PM, Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com wrote:
one struts-core instead of struts-core and xwork-core -
but we still discussing the best option.
For example, should the package structure change drastically?
-Dale
2011/6/5 Dale Newfield d...@newfield.org:
On Jun 5, 2011, at 2:37 PM, Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com
wrote:
one struts-core instead of struts-core and xwork-core -
but we still discussing the best option.
For example, should the package structure change drastically?
Yeah, from
I'm nervous about using the clean delineation between the web and non-web
bits. I like that separation.
Dave
Thank you.
I was curious if anything more than refactoring the package structure would be
involved.
jb
/
On Jun 5, 2011, at 2:09 PM, Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com wrote:
2011/6/5 Dale Newfield d...@newfield.org:
On Jun 5, 2011, at 2:37 PM, Lukasz Lenart
On Jun 5, 2011, at 3:09 PM, Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com wrote:
package structure change drastically?
Yeah, from com.opensymphony.xwork to org.apache.struts, but that's
inevitable sooner or later ...
That's a name change but if a 1-1 mapping still not really a structural
I assume you meant losing instead of using?
-Dale
On Jun 5, 2011, at 3:17 PM, Dave Newton davelnew...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm nervous about using the clean delineation between the web and non-web
bits. I like that separation.
Dave
Perhaps migrate the package structure to org.apache.struts.xwork and keep it
as a separate jar for now to accomodate the non-web users. Then if we opt to
merge it in the future it will already have the uniform package structure
and still be semi-partitioned in the xwork sub-package.
On Sun, Jun
What all does merging entail?
jb
/
From: Dave Newton davelnew...@gmail.com
To: Struts Developers List dev@struts.apache.org; lukasz.len...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2011 6:20 PM
Subject: Re: Unit test error for xwork-core in trunk
+1, but we've been saying that for awhile ;)
Not sure
As we noticed, the opensymphony webiste has been shutdown, so the dtd
is no longer reachable.
On 1 June 2011 07:15, Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com wrote:
2011/6/1 John Lindal lind...@yahoo-inc.com:
I get “Wrong line number:
2011/6/1 Maurizio Cucchiara maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com:
As we noticed, the opensymphony webiste has been shutdown, so the dtd
is no longer reachable.
So I think it's the time to merge XWork into Struts2 Core, WDYT?
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Warszawa JUG
+1 definitely
Maurizio Cucchiara
Il giorno 01/giu/2011 20.47, Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com
ha scritto:
2011/6/1 Maurizio Cucchiara maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com:
As we noticed, the opensymphony webiste has been shutdown, so the dtd
is no longer reachable.
So I think it's the time
+1
John
On 6/1/11 11:50 AM, Maurizio Cucchiara maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1 definitely
Maurizio Cucchiara
Il giorno 01/giu/2011 20.47, Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com
ha scritto:
2011/6/1 Maurizio Cucchiara maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com:
As we noticed, the
+1
Jason Pyeron
-Original Message-
From: John Lindal [mailto:lind...@yahoo-inc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 14:54
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Unit test error for xwork-core in trunk
+1
John
On 6/1/11 11:50 AM, Maurizio Cucchiara
maurizio.cucchi
+1
Johannes
-
--
web: http://www.jgeppert.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep
--
View this message in context:
http://struts.1045723.n5.nabble.com/Unit-test-error-for-xwork-core-in-trunk-tp4443743p4446228.html
Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com
+1 for merging
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Johannes Geppert jo...@apache.org wrote:
+1
Johannes
-
--
web: http://www.jgeppert.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep
--
View this message in context:
http://struts.1045723.n5.nabble.com/Unit-test-error-for-xwork-core
+1, but we've been saying that for awhile ;)
Not sure what the best way to do it is, though.
I doubt anybody is tracking our XW core anymore, although at one point
there were people using just XW. And I like the idea of keeping the
core command stuff separate from the web-related stuff.
Dave
We should seriously consider to relocate the opensymphony dtds in the
meanwhile. I make you note that the first messages are starting to appear in
the user ml.
WDYT?
--
Maurizio Cucchiara
Il giorno 02/giu/2011 01.20, Dave Newton davelnew...@gmail.com ha
scritto:
+1, but we've been saying that
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara wrote:
[...] relocate the opensymphony dtds in the meanwhile [...]
Relo and announce, sure.
An Atlassian guy shows up in the whois, should we reach out?
Dave
-
To
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Dave Newton davelnew...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara wrote:
[...] relocate the opensymphony dtds in the meanwhile [...]
Relo and announce, sure.
An Atlassian guy shows up in the whois, should we reach out?
To Mike? Sure,
I get “Wrong line number:
http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-config-1.0.dtd:1:2” from
com.opensymphony.xwork2.validator.DefaultValidatorFileParserTest.testParserWithBadXML2()
I’m using Maven 2, but I can’t see how that would affect the unit tests.
Is anybody else getting this
email peuvent facilement
être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité
pour le contenu fourni.
From: lind...@yahoo-inc.com
To: dev@struts.apache.org
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 17:27:02 -0700
Subject: Unit test error for xwork-core in trunk
I get “Wrong line
2011/6/1 John Lindal lind...@yahoo-inc.com:
I get “Wrong line number:
http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-config-1.0.dtd:1:2” from
com.opensymphony.xwork2.validator.DefaultValidatorFileParserTest.testParserWithBadXML2()
Are you behind a firewall ? I had got such problem when I
26 matches
Mail list logo
