On 4/17/06, Gabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's telling that the lion's share of code related issues we've discussed so
far about Struts
2 on this list (Annotation driven actions, pluggability of expression
language, use of dev
mode, etc., etc.) are really issues that should be brought to
Don Brown wrote:
Bob Lee wrote:
Also, how do the tags relate to JSTL? Are we just going to ignore
JSTL? Or are we going to use JSTL for JSP with some WebWork-specific
extensions and the WebWork tags for other template engines?
I personally prefer the latter option. Struts has always tried to
Ian Roughley wrote:
Don Brown wrote:
Bob Lee wrote:
Also, how do the tags relate to JSTL? Are we just going to ignore
JSTL? Or are we going to use JSTL for JSP with some WebWork-specific
extensions and the WebWork tags for other template engines?
I personally prefer the latter option.
This doesn't concern XWork itself.
Huh? I thought we were talking about moving it?
The question is can Struts continue to depend on
XWork externally and
actually be cohesive? I want one comprehensive
manual. I don't
necesarily want the servlet API to be readily
available, but when I
On 4/18/06, Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This doesn't concern XWork itself.
Huh? I thought we were talking about moving it?
I didn't say anything about moving it.
Okay, so make your Action implement ServletContextAware, ServletRequestAware,
etc.
I was specifically thinking
On 4/18/06, Jason Carreira
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This doesn't concern XWork itself.
Huh? I thought we were talking about moving it?
I didn't say anything about moving it.
Ahh, you're talking about forking it and copying the source into Struts Action
2?
-(as many as I'm allowed
On 4/14/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... to get the Javadoc generated for the
site, add this to action/pom.xml:
reporting
plugins
plugin
groupIdorg.apache.maven.plugins/groupId
artifactIdmaven-javadoc-plugin/artifactId
On 4/18/06, Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ahh, you're talking about forking it and copying the source into Struts
Action 2?
No... but I do think we should shield Struts users from the XWork
API/documentation as much as possible (i.e. a lot more than WebWork
does). I _suppose_ it's
On 4/18/06, Bob Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No... but I do think we should shield Struts users from the XWork
API/documentation as much as possible (i.e. a lot more than WebWork
does). I _suppose_ it's nice that you can drop down to XWork and do
non-web things, but I don't think we need to
Ted,
The below reason (3rd paragraph, man i wish yahoo did the little things) is
why we should probably decide to move XWork over now or forever hold our peace,
unless of course phase I is supposed to be an alpha or preview release and
phase II is mainly when Action 2 will be in production.
On 4/18/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would tend to disagree. I feel that the separate of concerns between
XWork and a web application front end are important. I don't believe
it would be helpful to start lumping things back together again.
Providing Struts users with a complete,
This has been a topic I've been wondering about for a while: would it be possible to move to Java 5, then use a tool
such as Retroweaver [1] to provide Java 1.4 support? I'm not prepared to completely abandon Java 1.4 users, but Bob
does make some good points regarding the concern for falling
On 4/18/06, Bob Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Without saying whether we should support 1.4 or not, realistically
we're talking about Struts 2.0.0 in production some time after August
depending how long it takes users to port their applications, not
right now, at this moment, right? JDK 1.6
You mean we have committers who aren't running 1.5 yet? For shame. ;)
I'll set up the rough spots page.
Bob
On 4/18/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When a committer votes +1 on a release, it's taken to mean that the
committer is using the release in production his or herself, and that
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by Bob Lee:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsAction2
--
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by Bob Lee:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots
New page:
Describe RoughSpots here.
On 4/18/06, Bob Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll set up the rough spots page.
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots?action=show
Bob
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by Bob Lee:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots
--
- Describe
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by Bob Lee:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots
--
- * Looking up a
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by Bob Lee:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots
--
- * Looking up a
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39121.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by Bob Lee:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots
--
1. On the
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by Bob Lee:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots
--
Dear All
The JAVAWUG (Java Web User Group) has rescheduled the BOF XVIII (Number
17) from Thursday 20th April to now Friday 20th April 2006.
The birds-of-feather will still take place at the same venue, Oracle's
City of London office between 7-9:30 pm. The presentations are and
the
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by Bob Lee:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots
--
== Nice to
This is a great list, thanks for taking the time to put it up. I may not agree with everything, but it is sure to spark
conversation :)
Don
Bob Lee wrote:
On 4/18/06, Bob Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll set up the rough spots page.
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots?action=show
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by WendySmoak:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/EventActionDispatcher
--
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by MichaelJouravlev:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots
The comment on the change is:
Plugged in EventActionDispatcher information
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by angelozerr:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/FormView
--
* add style
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by Bob Lee:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots
--
1.
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by TedHusted:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsAction2
--
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by TedHusted:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots
The comment on the change is:
Conform pronouns to use we throughout
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by Bob Lee:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots
--
- Some things that
I decided to pull this out to the mailing list to keep Rough Spots
page [1] cleaner.
crazybob: Come up with a clean way to separate view actions from
update actions. ... [As one of the options] we could flag action
invocations as view or update (using an enum). We could
automatically choose a
I'll buy that, but users should understand that malicious users can
put HTML like this on other sites:
img src=http://yoursite/deleteAccount;
That's not to say that POSTs are 100% immune to this sort of thing.
They're just slightly less susceptible. The safe solution is to emded
some sort of
Also, the first couple paragraphs in the DefaultActionMapper section
describe how WebWork handles this sort of dispatching:
http://opensymphony.com/webwork/wikidocs/ActionMapper.html
Bob
On 4/18/06, Michael Jouravlev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I decided to pull this out to the mailing list to
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39121.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: wsmoak
Date: Tue Apr 18 21:10:42 2006
New Revision: 395124
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=395124view=rev
Log:
Move documentation up to top-level Struts Action site. (Part 1)
Added:
struts/action/trunk/src/
struts/action/trunk/src/site/
- copied from r395117,
Author: wsmoak
Date: Tue Apr 18 21:11:48 2006
New Revision: 395126
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=395126view=rev
Log:
Move documentation up to top-level Struts Action site. (Part 2)
Removed:
struts/action/trunk/core/src/site/
Author: wsmoak
Date: Tue Apr 18 21:12:48 2006
New Revision: 395128
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=395128view=rev
Log:
Add reporting config for the Javadoc plugin. (Aggregation will only work with
2.0-SNAPSHOT.)
Modified:
struts/action/trunk/pom.xml
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26322.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26322.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 4/18/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We definitely need an action/src/site directory to contain
the root site.xml that others inherit, and if you can get
over the aforementioned issue, then collecting all docs
there would work for me.
I moved action/core/src/site up to src/site,
43 matches
Mail list logo
