There seems to be a problem with the site generation and lists - maven
doesn't like the list of shale pmc members :-o
I just added the Shale announcment, but the ul list seems to screw
up the following paragraphs. If you have one item in the list its all
OK, 2 and one of the paragraphs
On 6/28/06, Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The key I think is making it clear that 2.x really is something new
Yes, if you look at the Migration Guide
* http://struts.apache.org/struts-action2/docs/Migration%20Guide.html
three of the four strategies involve either leaving S1 code
At 5:34 PM -0700 6/28/06, Paul Benedict wrote:
I have two concerns on the 1.3.x line. What do you think?
1) Spring 2.0 has fabulous support for dependency injection for
Struts. In particular, the great Autowiring(Tiles)RequestProcessor
will automatically inject dependencies into the actions
On 6/28/06, Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Jouravlev wrote:
Do you mean by building DispatchCommand or DialogCommand? And then
slapping this command onto the chain... but I can replace Action as
well. Oh I see, Action is not an interface, but Command is. Always
keep
On 6/23/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll be heads-down for the rest of June finishing up a contract, but
I'll be back come July 5, ready to wrap up Struts Action 1.3.5 (if no
one beats me to it). I've the rest of July blocked out to work on SAF
2.0.0 documentation and remaining code
+1
-
Posted via Jive Forums
http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=35827messageID=70400#70400
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Laurie Harper wrote:
The restriction comes from the Java relection API semantics, not OGNL. A
property can only have one type, so it makes sense that the getter and
setter for a JavaBean property must agree on that type. Changing this
would break compatibility with the JavaBean specification,
+1
+1 to which? ;-)
I'm for just calling them Struts 1.x and Struts 2.x, not the Struts2 version
2.1 idea. We went through that for a while with WebWork, and it was confusing.
-
Posted via Jive Forums
The team I work with has encountered an apparent problem with Struts
when the servlet is reloaded by the container. We are using Weblogic
9.1, but the problem appear to happen on other versions, and possibly
other containers. The spec does not appear to be clear regarding the
ServletContext
On 6/29/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, Ted. I'm probably out until mid-July as far as releases.
I'll try to get to the little things that need to be done in advance
of 1.3.5, such as releasing an updated struts-parent pom and a new
struts-build jar with the Checkstyle changes.
Ted Husted wrote:
On 6/29/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, Ted. I'm probably out until mid-July as far as releases.
I'll try to get to the little things that need to be done in advance
of 1.3.5, such as releasing an updated struts-parent pom and a new
struts-build jar with the
Andy:
Use this as your action servlet instead:
http://struts.apache.org/struts-doc-1.2.9/api/org/apache/struts/actions/RedeployableActionServlet.html
Paul
Andy Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The team I work with has encountered an
apparent problem with Struts
when the servlet is reloaded by
The CargoTestSetup class that you added to the test framework (was this
Wendy's first commit of Java code? :-) nicely leverages the fact that Cargo
will figure out which container to use based on system properties
(specifically cargo.container.id). However, the way that this class is
being used
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUGĀ·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18032.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED ANDĀ·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 6/29/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There seems to be a problem with the site generation and lists - maven
doesn't like the list of shale pmc members :-o
I just added the Shale announcment, but the ul list seems to screw
up the following paragraphs. If you have one item in the
On 6/30/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/29/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There seems to be a problem with the site generation and lists - maven
doesn't like the list of shale pmc members :-o
I just added the Shale announcment, but the ul list seems to screw
up
16 matches
Mail list logo