-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Ok, thank you guys! :)
I will test it. Now that I'm thinking of it, detach may be very useful.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: APG v1.1.1
iQJCBAEBCgAsBQJTsk7qJRxEaW1pdHJpcyBaZXJ2YXMgPGR6ZXJ2YXNAZHplcnZh
See also: https://kentonv.github.io/capnproto/
Hello
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 03:48:48AM +0300, Dimitris Zervas wrote:
After a year or so in the list, I think each and every one is using tmux or
screen (I think more tmux, but do not start a war please, that's not the
subject).
Why is that? For the tabs?
Why not use tabbed? or DWM's
tmux is useful for detach, tabs, scrolling and copy/paste.
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Maxime Coste frrr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 03:48:48AM +0300, Dimitris Zervas wrote:
After a year or so in the list, I think each and every one is using tmux or
screen (I
I'd rather have the window manager manage all those persistent shell sessions.
But tmux is such a beast that most people use is as their window
manager in a window manager as well. It's a bit kafkaesque to run a
seperate tmux for each shell you open, but those other detach
alternatives don't seem
Rob wrote:
You've got alignment issues here - msg will be aligned to support any
type (as malloc's interface specifies) so msg+1 will most likely be on
an odd address, one byte off a highly aligned address. This means if
your struct contains anything other than chars, you'll have UB. This is
On 1 July 2014 12:44, hiro 23h...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd rather have the window manager manage all those persistent shell sessions.
But tmux is such a beast that most people use is as their window
manager in a window manager as well.
At some point, I use to run a vim inside a tmux inside a
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Markus Teich markus.te...@stusta.mhn.de wrote:
thanks for your feedback. What about declaring a struct for each message-type:
struct msg_signed_data {
unsigned int op;
struct foo data;
struct bar signature;
};
This should also solve
* hiro 2014-07-01 13:45
I'd rather have the window manager manage all those persistent shell sessions.
But tmux is such a beast that most people use is as their window
manager in a window manager as well.
tmux (or dvtm, or tabbed, or other multiplexer) run locally inside
wm make sense for
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 01:56:04PM +0200, Markus Teich wrote:
struct msg_signed_data {
unsigned int op;
struct foo data;
struct bar signature;
};
If this is data that goes across the network then instead of
directly mapping a struct on that data I'd simply have functions
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 03:48:48AM +0300, Dimitris Zervas wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello,
After a year or so in the list, I think each and every one is using tmux or
screen (I think more tmux, but do not start a war please, that's not the
subject).
Why is
On Tue, 01 Jul 2014 08:42:03 +0530
Weldon Goree wel...@langurwallah.org wrote:
Lemma: does anybody know of a good environment-managing program[0]?
This is not a lemma.
I know a good program. It's called .. Check it out!
Cheers
FRIGN
--
FRIGN d...@frign.de
On 07/01/2014 07:21 PM, FRIGN wrote:
This is not a lemma.
I know a good program. It's called .. Check it out!
Pretty sure it's a lemma.
Dot is great. It also doesn't do what I'm looking for, and isn't even a
program in most sense of the word.
Cheers,
Weldon
On Tue, 01 Jul 2014 19:24:09 +0530
Weldon Goree wel...@langurwallah.org wrote:
Pretty sure it's a lemma.
I'm sure it's not, given I deal with lemmata every day being a
mathematician. What you have presented simply is a question.
See the .-suggestion as a serious note. Set up right, you can
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 03:51:00PM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
On Tue, 01 Jul 2014 08:42:03 +0530
Weldon Goree wel...@langurwallah.org wrote:
Lemma: does anybody know of a good environment-managing program[0]?
This is not a lemma.
I know a good program. It's called .. Check it out!
Please see
On 07/01/2014 07:34 PM, FRIGN wrote:
I'm sure it's not, given I deal with lemmata every day being a
mathematician. What you have presented simply is a question.
In a rare event on mailing lists, I concede: it wasn't a lemma, but an
invitation to make one.
See the .-suggestion as a serious
On Tue, 01 Jul 2014 19:35:06 +0530
Weldon Goree wel...@langurwallah.org wrote:
In a rare event on mailing lists, I concede: it wasn't a lemma, but an
invitation to make one.
Yes, I totally agree on that. Hopefully somebody comes up with a lemma,
but I won't be the one to prove it ;).
Will
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 4:04 PM, FRIGN d...@frign.de wrote:
On Tue, 01 Jul 2014 19:24:09 +0530
Weldon Goree wel...@langurwallah.org wrote:
Pretty sure it's a lemma.
I'm sure it's not, given I deal with lemmata every day being a
mathematician. What you have presented simply is a question.
Rob wrote:
You've got alignment issues here - msg will be aligned to support any
type (as malloc's interface specifies) so msg+1 will most likely be on
an odd address, one byte off a highly aligned address. This means if
your struct contains anything other than chars, you'll have UB. This is
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 05:01:43PM +0200, Markus Teich wrote:
Rob wrote:
You've got alignment issues here - msg will be aligned to support any
type (as malloc's interface specifies) so msg+1 will most likely be on
an odd address, one byte off a highly aligned address. This means if
your
Quoth Silvan Jegen on Mon, Jun 30 2014 09:39 +0200:
Better than link-numbering using numbers is the link-enumeration
using characters on the homerow on the keyboard:
Page 1[aa] 2[ab] 3[js]...
I am not aware of a text-based browser that works that way though.
Excellent idea. Would JavaScript
On 06/30, Charlie Kester wrote:
On Mon 30 Jun 2014 at 17:48:48 PDT Dimitris Zervas wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello,
After a year or so in the list, I think each and every one is using tmux or
screen (I think more tmux, but do not start a war please, that's
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Markus Teich markus.te...@stusta.mhn.de wrote:
Rob wrote:
You've got alignment issues here - msg will be aligned to support any
type (as malloc's interface specifies) so msg+1 will most likely be on
an odd address, one byte off a highly aligned address. This
Dimitris Zervas writes:
Hello,
After a year or so in the list, I think each and every one is using tmux or
screen (I think more tmux, but do not start a war please, that's not the
subject).
Why is that?
I use tmux with ii for IRC. I was tired of always confusing the irssi and
tmux
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 08:54:52PM +0200, Markus Teich wrote:
Heyho,
since I did not find any suckless project regarding this issue, I would like
to
ask you guys for some feedback:
unsigned char *msg;
size_t msg_size;
struct foo *msg_data;
struct bar *msg_signature;
msg_size =
2014-06-29 18:43 GMT+04:00 Aapo Vienamo aapo.vien...@iki.fi:
2. Fantastic syntax highlighting
This may be considered harmfull in general. [0]
[0] http://www.linusakesson.net/programming/syntaxhighlighting/
Hello,
This snippet of thought makes a case that reading code is like reading
a
26 matches
Mail list logo
