Re: SYNCOPE-1138 followup

Thanks Francesco, I can confirm the fix! Colm. On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: > On 27/10/2017 10:11, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: > >> Hi Colm, >> I confirm the problem on master; 2_0_X works fine with your use-case >> below, instead. >>

Re: SYNCOPE-1138 followup

On 27/10/2017 10:11, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: Hi Colm, I confirm the problem on master; 2_0_X works fine with your use-case below, instead. I probably made some mistake when merging to master; a fix will be provided soon. Here you go:

Re: SYNCOPE-1138 followup

Hi Colm, I confirm the problem on master; 2_0_X works fine with your use-case below, instead. I probably made some mistake when merging to master; a fix will be provided soon. Regards. On 26/10/2017 18:58, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: Hi all, A quick follow-up on the fix for SYNCOPE-1138.

SYNCOPE-1138 followup

Hi all, A quick follow-up on the fix for SYNCOPE-1138. I'm not able to reproduce the fix on the latest master code - maybe I'm missing something obvious. Here's what I'm doing: a) Create a "size" plain attribute b) Create EngineClass AnyTypeClass with this attribute, and a CarClass AnyTypeClass