Re: [DISCUSS] - Privileges in Syncope 2.1.0

2018-03-12 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
Hi, I went ahead and created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-1281 and https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SYNCOPE/%5BDISCUSS%5D+Privilege+management for discussion. Regards. On 15/09/2017 08:49, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: On 14/09/2017 18:36, Colm O hEigeartaigh

Re: [DISCUSS] - Privileges in Syncope 2.1.0

2017-09-15 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
On 14/09/2017 18:36, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 8:47 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: That's fine. (SCIM? Are you working on something that might be useful for SYNCOPE-152?) Yes, hopefully I will have some news on this soon. Wow :-) Is it a

Re: [DISCUSS] - Privileges in Syncope 2.1.0

2017-09-14 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 8:47 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: > > That's fine. > (SCIM? Are you working on something that might be useful for SYNCOPE-152?) > Yes, hopefully I will have some news on this soon. > > Is it a possibility to use the same schema definitions

Re: [DISCUSS] - Privileges in Syncope 2.1.0

2017-09-14 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
On 08/09/2017 16:33, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: Hi Francesco, On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 8:18 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: Very practical reasons (as said elsewhere I believe): starting with 2.0, Entitlements are no more database entities (as they used to be up to 1.2)

Re: [DISCUSS] - Privileges in Syncope 2.1.0

2017-09-08 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
Hi Francesco, On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 8:18 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: > > Very practical reasons (as said elsewhere I believe): starting with 2.0, > Entitlements are no more database entities (as they used to be up to 1.2) > but Java constants. > OK thanks for the

Re: [DISCUSS] - Privileges in Syncope 2.1.0

2017-09-08 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
Hi Colm, see my replies below. Regards. On 07/09/2017 18:20, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: Hi Francesco, A few further thoughts on this: a) Instead of having both entitlements + privileges, would it make sense to only have privileges, where the "entitlements" are privileges on the Syncope

Re: [DISCUSS] - Privileges in Syncope 2.1.0

2017-09-07 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
Hi Francesco, A few further thoughts on this: a) Instead of having both entitlements + privileges, would it make sense to only have privileges, where the "entitlements" are privileges on the Syncope application? It would seem less confusing and kind of neat to model everything as a single