DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37870.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37356.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hey!
I have changed the cluster message header format long time ago 5.5.10.
In some situations TCP Stack split the message, then the
receiver byte array interpretation start to early. Arrggh, after first
exception the receiver socket is hanging and replication transfer
stops.
Wait a
Howdy,
OK, thanks for following up. Please let us know once the bug is fixed...
Yoav
On 12/14/05, Peter Rossbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey!
I have changed the cluster message header format long time ago 5.5.10.
In some situations TCP Stack split the message, then the
receiver byte array
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37895.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Tim Funk wrote:
2) X-Forwarded-For (IIRC) can be multi-valued (comma seperated via
multiple proxies)
Plus, other load balancers seem to stick in other headers, too (e.g.
X-Real-IP). (These two seem to be the most popular).
It'll be an interesting job to figure out the real IP address if
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37793.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37896.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37896.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37896.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Yoav Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tomcat 5.5.14 is:
[ ] Stable
[X] Beta - At least one significant issue preventing stability (please
elaborate)
[ ] Alpha - Multiple significant issues (please elaborate)
BZ 37852 is about as significant as it gets :).
Author: billbarker
Date: Wed Dec 14 20:15:17 2005
New Revision: 356975
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=356975view=rev
Log:
Fix problem using an inner class for a jsp:bean /.
I have no reason to not believe that kinman's CCLA isn't still in effect, so I
don't see an IP issue in accepting
Author: billbarker
Date: Wed Dec 14 20:25:15 2005
New Revision: 356976
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=356976view=rev
Log:
Doc change
Modified:
tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Modified: tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
URL:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37458.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37896.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
15 matches
Mail list logo