DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37356.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
There was lots of changes for Tomcat Native that needs a
new tag and release bump.
1. IPV6 support fix
2. Bind fix
3. sendb(b) fixes
I would like to tag the TOMCAT_NATIVE_1_1_2 later this
evening. Any objections?
Regards,
Mladen.
Hi!
Are you still interessted in version 5.0? I've collected all the missing
files manually. There is only a problem when ant is trying to build it.
Perhaps you can solve it.
build-catalina-core:
[javac] Compiling 326 source files to O:\Diplomarbeit\Tomcat
5.0.30\jakarta-
Thanks! I felt I had it a time or two, but the build script that I use
(I'm trying to build a pristine copy) downloads stuff from sourceforge and
kept getting into trouble downloading the mx4j bits. Seems like they
dropped the mx4j 2.1.0 and you can only get mx4j 2.1.1 - making a truly
pristine
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38570.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: fhanik
Date: Wed Feb 8 07:01:39 2006
New Revision: 375976
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=375976view=rev
Log:
moved notes to the bottom for compression, default value has changed
Modified:
tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/modules/cluster/to-do.txt
Modified:
+0
PS: Don't have time to work on the iSeries port ;(
2006/2/8, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
There was lots of changes for Tomcat Native that needs a
new tag and release bump.
1. IPV6 support fix
2. Bind fix
3. sendb(b) fixes
I would like to tag the TOMCAT_NATIVE_1_1_2 later this
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37356.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38577.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38579.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
What are the SocketReplicationListener and the SocketReplicationThread
classes?
seems like we are duplicating functionality. I'm planning on breaking
out the membership and replication logic into a component so that we
don't mix group messaging logic with session replication logic as they
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38579.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38579.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
13 matches
Mail list logo